WHAT IS TRUE BREAD ? The Son saith to the people Beware of the Leaven of the Pharisees & Sadducees ! The Disciples became confused.They thought He was referring to the Literal Leaven Bread which the Pharisees had. But in Actuality He was referring to the Doctrine they taught, which was hypocrisy. He warned the people ..... Do not eat of there Puffed up and Prideful Words and Doctrines. And The Son Explains this to his Disciples Saying ........ Matt 16 : 11 - How is it that ye do not understand ..... That I spake it NOT to you Concerning Bread ..... That ye should beware of the Leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then understood the disciples how he bade them NOT to BEWARE of the Leaven of Bread, BUT of the DOCTRINE of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees. Luke 12:1 ........ He began to say unto his disciples first of all, Beware ye of the LEAVEN of the Pharisees, which is HYPOCRISY. The Son was Constantly speaking in the Symbolisms. He was very SPIRITUALLY Minded. As is EVERY prophet under the SPIRIT. He teaches us that a Doctrine which is not Gods, is the Bread of Men ..... It is a Doctrine which is Contrary to Gods, and furthermore Hypocrisy. So if The Son was speaking in Symbolisms when referring to the Pharisees Doctrine.He must also speak in Symbolisms when referring to His Doctrine and even relate it to some sort of Bread. In the Book of John Chapter 4 : 33 - 53 we learn more. He says I am the Bread of Life ... & .... I am the Living Bread which came down from Heaven. Christ goes on further to say ...... And the Bread that I will give is ...... MY FLESH. So we Learn that there is a Good Bread & Bad Bread. A Good Doctrine and Bad Doctrine. The Good Bread is The Sons Body or Flesh ........ OR ....... The Doctrine which he teaches and keeps, The Word of the Father . The Bad Bread is ANYTHING Contrary. Here comes the Twist ......... We see in the First Occurrence with the Pharisees HE WAS NOT referring to Literal Bread but instead Their Doctrine And His Disciples became confused. We see in John Chapter 4 .... HE WAS NOT referring to his Literal Bread but once again ... His Doctrine And Many became confused. Why the Third time .....would we think At the Last Supper When The Son Broke Unleavened Bread and said it was his FLESH That he was INFACT referring to the Literal Bread ? I know many take Communion or Bread & Wine or the Unleavened Bread Passover Literally. And Thats Ok. Its even more important to understand what Our Mentor, Teacher, and Role Model was saying. THIS SPIRITUALLY MINDED INDIVIDUAL .... The Messiah .... was asking us to break the WORD in remembrance of Him. We eat the Bread of the Holy Spirit. We eat the Bread of Life. We Spiritually & Mentally consume his Doctrine. A scripture in Jeremiah expounds ..... Jeremiah 15 : 16 - Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: For I am called by THY NAME, O Lord God of hosts Luke 22:19 - And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake [it], and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. Acts 2:42 - And they continued stedfastly in the apostles doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. Acts 20:7 - And upon the first [day] of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued HIS SPEECH until midnight. Acts 2:46 - And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and SINGLENESS of heart, Acts 2:1-47 - And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. Acts 20:11 - When he therefore was come up again, and had broken bread, and eaten, and TALKED a long while, even till break of day, so he departed. BLESSED ARE THOSE WHICH HUNGER & THIRST AFTER RIGHTEOUSNESS.
Posted on: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:13:57 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015