WHATS THIS? AROUND THE WEB Breast Cancer Is A Family Affair: The Truth About Screening Mediaplanet New Top Corporate Job: Meet Your New CDO The Wall Street Journal Avoid These 10 Jobs: They Have No Future Kiplinger MMA Fighters Evander Holyfield and Anderson Silva Display Their Favorite Fighting Techniques Stack ALSO ON CNSNEWS.COM Obama to Cuba: End Unnecessary Restrictions on Political, … 29 comments Hot 2014 Doesn’t Prove Manmade Global Warming Hysteria Right 141 comments Coburns Farewell: Our Charge Is to Protect the Future of Our … 32 comments McCaughey: Americans Facing Big Fines If They Dont Have Insurance 118 comments 123 Comments CNSNews Login Sort by Newest Favorite Share − Avatar CherryAnn1000 12 minutes ago The 20 lib Reps were not listed, but how much do you want to bet they are all RINOS? 0 Reply − Avatar William Tyndale 16 minutes ago Not surprising. There are more Arlen Specter type Republicans in the Senate than at anytime in history. It is not enough to vote out the Dems. Now believers in the Constitution must also vote out the trojan horses who campaign as conservatives but vote as liberals. For shame. 1 Reply − Avatar J.B. Young 23 minutes ago Turncoats! Traitors! When congress is back in session, we need to call these bums every day and harass them. Demand they do what the voters want. What they promised. 1 Reply − Avatar Ludlow Porch 35 minutes ago IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT WE VOTERS SAY OR WANT. CONGRESS IS ONLY GOING TO DO WHAT IS BEST FOR THEMSELVES! We elect them to do our will, but when we put them in office, they do their own switch to further their OWN CAUSE, Not Ours. Somewhere along the line, over the years, we have never challenged these people, WE JUST LET IT GO, this is one hell of a big mistake we made. NOW IT IS HAUNTING US! We need OVERALL GOVERNMENT REFORM!!! WE NEED IT NOW! 1 Reply − Avatar malcoolm1999 an hour ago Keep and make sure this list follows every one of these Lying RHINO Turncoats throughout their 2016 Re-Election Campaigns or their next scheduled Campaign. LET EACH AND EVERY ONE KNOW WE WILL NOT FORGET 3 Reply − Avatar Ludlow Porch an hour ago Beware of those that call evil, good and good, evil! We have the skinny on to twenty. 2 Reply − Avatar malcoolm1999 an hour ago HERE IS YOUR LIST OF TURNCOAT REPUBLICANS - While 22 Republican Senators voted to uphold the constitutional point of order, 20 Republican Senators joined with 54 Democrats in voting against the point of order. Three Republicans and one Democrat did not vote. The sharply divided vote came as a surprise. Though some Republican Senators are pro-amnesty, they have all spoken out against President Obama for overstepping his constitutional authority, including those that voted against the point of order. Their statements, made just three weeks ago, are below. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Lamar AlexanderSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard46%: “Our Founders did not want a king and the American people don’t want a president who acts like one. Our immigration system is broken and our border is a mess. The president should be working with Congress to secure the border and create a system of legal immigration – not disregarding the rule of law and the will of the American people.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Kelly AyotteSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard48%: “While I support fixing our nation’s broken immigration system, the president should honor his own words that unilateral action on immigration reform is ‘not how our democracy functions’ and ‘not how our Constitution is written.‘ By circumventing Congress, the president will only make it more difficult to achieve long-term reforms to secure our border, stop future waves of illegal immigration, and reform our legal immigration system.” (11.19.2014) Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. John BarrassoSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard68%: “President Obama’s announcement on executive amnesty flies in the face of his promises to follow the law, deliver ‘fairness’ and help jobless Americans. His reckless and unlawful decision makes it even harder for Washington to solve our immigration challenges.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Daniel Coats (R-IN)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Daniel Coats59%Senate Republican Average63%See Full Scorecard59%: “President Obama’s role is to faithfully execute the law, not alter or ignore it as he sees fit. If the president changes existing immigration law via executive order, he will exceed his Constitutional authority and ignore the wishes of the American people. Taking this action would be a disservice to everyone who followed the law to legally immigrate to the United States. I am working with my colleagues to explore all options – legislative and legal – to stop the president’s blatant disregard for our nation’s system of checks and balances.” (11.19.2014) Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Thad CochranSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard51%: “There is no justifiable reason for President Obama to act alone now to allow millions of illegal immigrants to stay in the United States…By circumventing the legislative process now, I believe the President is making it much harder to address these problems. The Congress should review its best options and then act responsibly to address the President’s actions and ensure the primacy of the rule of law.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Susan CollinsSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard22%: “The President has said previously that the best way to address this problem is legislatively and that he does not have the authority to act unilaterally. His actions are contradicting his previous statements. … I am extremely concerned that President Obama’s excessive use of executive orders to circumvent Congress is undermining our constitutional separation of powers doctrine. His unilateral action on such a significant issue is contrary to how our constitutional system is supposed to work.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Bob CorkerSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard48%: “The president is blatantly ignoring the rule of law and Congress’ constitutional role, and I could not be more disappointed. Congress has to respond, but the response should be prudent and we should not lose sight of the fact that our job over the next two years is to enact policies that will make our nation stronger.” (11.20.2014) Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. John CornynSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard75%: “But the answer is not, and it can’t be, a Presidential abuse of power. So I wish the President wouldn’t do this. It won’t work. It’s unconstitutional. It purports to exercise a power he himself said he does not have, but he seems determined to do it, nonetheless.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Michael Enzi (R-WY)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Michael EnziSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard70%: “By circumventing Congress on immigration and instituting his will through executive actions, President Obama is eroding the very foundation of our country and form of government. This sets a dangerous precedent where future presidents can flout any law they happen to disagree with and alter the law without going through Congress. Each branch of government is to act as a check against the others and not sit idly by as one exercises authority it does not have. A constitutional law professor should know that.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Jeff FlakeSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard59% (and Sen. McCain): Previously, he said executive action “would not conform with my appropriate role as president,” and “that’s not how our system works. That’s not how our democracy functions. That’s not how our Constitution is written.” On this, we couldn’t have agreed with President Obama more. (11.22.2014) Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Lindsey Graham47%Senate Republican Average63%See Full Scorecard47%: “This is wrong. It’s irresponsible. It will do damage to our efforts to fix a broken immigration system. This is a tremendous presidential overreach. I will try to defund the effort for him to go it alone. We will challenge him in court.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Orrin Hatch52%Senate Republican Average63%See Full Scorecard52%: “He does not have the authority and the power to do what he is doing. … it’s not constitutional … You don’t solve this problem by mis-using the Constitution. The President 22 times has said he doesn’t have this kind of authority.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Dean Heller (R-NV)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Dean HellerSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard63%: “What I don’t agree with is the use of the executive order nor do I agree with the Administration bypassing Congress.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Ron JohnsonSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard81%: “President Obama declared a series of immigration actions through executive fiat. He has dictated his own laws — cutting out the American people and Congress — and then hypocritically declared he wants to debate the issue in good faith. … Over the last two years, President Obama has repeatedly stated that he does not have the constitutional authority to change immigration laws unilaterally.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Mark KirkSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard37%: “By driving over Congress and handling this issue the partisan way, the president has dimmed his ability of getting the votes he wanted for a bipartisan solution that includes border security and would allow the whole country to meet this challenge together.” (11.20.2014) Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. John McCainSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard49%: “As President Obama has previously said, he is not ‘a king’ or ‘the emperor of the United States,’ and he isn’t legally able to unilaterally change immigration law any way he sees fit. Congress has a responsibility to respond and push back on his illegal power-grab. Congress must be creative in using all the tools in our toolbox – including mounting a legal challenge – to oppose the President’s action. (11.20.2014) Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Mitch McConnellSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard67%: “If the President truly follows through on this attempt to impose his will unilaterally, he will have issued a rebuke to his own stated view of democracy. … The instances of President Obama saying that he does not have the power to do the kinds of things he now plans to do are almost too numerous to list. .. The action he’s proposed would ignore the law.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Lisa MurkowskiSenate Republican AverageSee Full Scorecard23%: “However, what I cannot support is immigration changes in the form of a Presidential fiat – an action publicly called unlawful by President Obama twenty two separate times. What’s changed, aside from him being on the other side of an election?” (11.20.2014) Sen. Patrick Toomey (R-PA)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Patrick Toomey67%Senate Republican Average63%See Full Scorecard67%: “I strongly oppose the President’s latest overreach of his legal authority and his decision to dictate sweeping immigration policy changes without legislation. America’s immigration system is badly broken and cries out for reform, including stronger border security and adequate opportunities for legal immigration. Regrettably, President Obama’s unilateral and legally unauthorized actions will do nothing to fix our broken system, and could encourage even more illegal immigration.” (11.20.2014) Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS)Heritage ActionScorecardSen. Roger Wicker45%Senate Republican Average63%See Full Scorecard45%: This amnesty order undermines the rule of law and threatens our system of checks and balances. … No president has the authority to act unilaterally in this manner – something that the courts will surely determine. In the coming months, the new Republican Congress will look to use the power of the purse and the judicial system to rein in this executive overreach.” (11.20.2014) And yes, the roughly dozen Democrats who expressed opposition to Obama’s executive actions voted against the point of order, too. 2 Reply − Avatar malcoolm1999 malcoolm1999 34 minutes ago Highlight, Copy, and Paste the above list everywhere on the net you can. Save and repost daily. Let them know we will not forget and that well be around on election day and that there are consequences for their lies, deceits, and betrayals. Change start with the removal of these TWENTY TURNCOATS. 0 Reply − Avatar jong 2 hours ago And they are very very fearful of them. That is twenty out of what 45 that could easily sway new people coming in not to vote for Mitch to lead the Party in the Senate. With the new ones it might make it 30 that will not vote for Mitch which means its time to clean house. That is what they are really afraid of. 3 Reply − Avatar k9 2 hours ago WE NEED A LIST OF THE 20 IDIOTS STHAT DEFLELCTED AND KISSED OBOZOS a$$ and voted for amnesty. All 20 of them should be hung by their fingernails to teach them a lesson. HOW DAMN STUPID CAN YOU BE, SAYING AMNESTY IS WRONG AND TURN AROUND AND VOTE FOR IT. THEY MUST HAVE HAD THEIUR HEADS UP OBOZOS REAREND 4 Reply − Avatar k9 2 hours ago We need a list of the 20 IDIOTS 5 Reply − Avatar Susan 2 hours ago And those 20 Republicans will lose their jobs ASAP!! Hows it feel though Kentucky to vote that louse McConnell back into office just to screw us?? 3 Reply − Avatar CherryAnn1000 Susan 10 minutes ago Not to mention Ohio and its native son, Boohoo Bonehead. 0 Reply − Avatar Ray 2 hours ago If 75% of the respondents to these sites would vote to get these RINOs out instead of just typing a message we could get our country back! 4 Reply − Avatar iitywybad Ray 2 hours ago I dont think its the people who post on these sites who dont vote, other than those who try to form a third party, get us to vote libertarian, or try to tell us that there is no difference between the two parties. Certainly the non-leadership of the Republican party should be replaced, but we have gained a lot of true conservatives in the last election. We need to support them, elect more, and get rid of McConnell and Boehner. Its the 4,000,000 persons who voted for McCain in 2008, but sat home in 2012 because Romney was not conservative enough. They are the ones with their heads up their posterior orifice. 5 Reply − Avatar Ray iitywybad an hour ago Agree maybe just maybe if we were to rid the republican party of the present leadership we may be able to get our country back on the right track, but this must happen like yesterday. 2 Reply − Avatar The Anti-Statist 2 hours ago ITS TIME TO MAKE... ..the lying, back-stabbing, war-on-conservatives-waging RepukingGoon party THE 3rd party! It can happen if REAL conservatives pull their collective heads out of their keesters and refuse to be the useful idiots the the RepukingGoon party depends on to maintain their status of not being a 3rd party. The Constitution Party is what the RepukingGoon party was 60+ years ago before they were castrated by the undocmented DemonKraps that now control the party: constitutionparty.c... View 3 Reply − Avatar iitywybad The Anti-Statist 2 hours ago If you think a third party is going to win an election, youre the one with your head up your keester. It took a long time to get to where we are, and its not going to be reversed in one election, but we are making gains, and I believe we have enough real conservatives in this congress to take over the leadership and start us on the road to recovery. We need to support the conservatives and insist they oust the current leadership. 2 Reply − Avatar Henry 2 hours ago We are not ASKINg for your opinion, Congress, WE the PEOPLE are TELLING YOU, NO AMNESTY? 9 Reply − Avatar Ludlow Porch Henry 32 minutes ago DAMN RIGHT! There Henry. 0 Reply Load more comments Powered by Disqus Subscribe Add Disqus to your site Privacy
Posted on: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:52:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015