WHEN ACCORDING TO RULES ANY PERSON INVOLING IN ANY CONTRACT WITH GOVT. OR HOLDING OFFICE OF PROFIT EVEN IN INSTITUTIONS AIDED BY GOVT. BECOMES UNELEGIBLE TO FIGHT ANY ELECTIONS AND HE HAS TO FILE AN AFFIDAVIT REGARDING THIS AND OTHER LEGAL FORMALITIES THEN IT IS A MATTER OF SURPRISE HOW MANY SUCH CANDIDATES FILE NOMINATION TO CONTEST THESE ELECTIONS. ACCORDING TO RULES EVEN THEIR PROPOSER MUST BE VOTER IN THAT CONSTITUENCY AND SUCH PROPOSERS SHOULD FULFILL ALL FORMALITIES OF CANDIDATES FOR FILLING NOMINATIONS. BUT PRESIDING OFFICERS TAKE ANY ACTION AGAINST SUCH CANDIDATES ONLY ON FILLING OBJECTION BY SOME CANDIDATES CONTESTING SUCH ELECTIONS . THIS IS NOT JUSTIFIED BUT RATHER PRESIDING OFFICERS THEMSELVES SHOULD VERIFIED ALL FACTS IN THE FORM FILLED BY CANDIDATES FOR CONTESTING ELECTIONS. SUCH ACTIONS TAKEN BY PRESIDING OFFERS WILL STOP SUCH UNELEGIBLE CANDIDATES TO FILE NOMINATION PAPERS. IF AT ALL ANY SUCH CANDIDATES SUCCEDES IN FILING NOMINATIONS PAPER AND DECLARED ELECTED THEN THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER SHOULD VERIFIED FACTS FILLED IN NOMINATION PAPER OF ELECTED CANDIDATES AND IF SUCH FACTS ARE NOT CORRECT THEN HIS ELECTION SHOULD BE DECLARED NULL AND VOID. SUCH STEPS OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION WILL DEMORALISED SUCH CANDIDATES AND STRENGTH DEMOCRACY
Posted on: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:24:17 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015