WHO OWNS PERTUSIO CAPITAL. IS THE SECRETARY FOR TREASURY ACTING FOR STATE OR HIMSELF. .PERTUSIO CAPITAL PARTNERS LIMITED (1-68546) ////////////////////////////// by Vincent MOSES on PNG NEWS Dairi Vele engaged Pertusio Capital to advice Government on the UBS loan. Unknown to us was that Pertusio was owned by the acting Secretary and was paying himself. Then pressure mounted on the UBS loan issue. The Deputy Opposition Leader wrote a complaint letter to ombudsman commission to investigate the acting Secretary for engaging himself and authorising himself and advising himself and been paid salary and fee by the state. ::Two weeks ago as per the IPA search : Diari Vele the Secretary of Treasury has given his shares to two of his directors Lars Rune Mortensen and Nathan Joshua Chang. These 3 guys have been working together running the gas office (might we remember where that 500 million kina was spent?). Giving your shares away shows this is to cover ones bottom in case of emergency. The emergency is now Mr Secretary of Treasury. Your game and foul play is out in the open for all to see. The Secretary was still a shareholder and Director when Pertusio did the work on the UBS deal and got a big fat fee. When this was raised on Facebook, nobody took notice. The MP for Bulolo had filed relevant information to ombudsman on the Pertusio with current search extract from IPA the Secretary has just changed this as the OC and TFS are looking into it. Are we seeing the real reasons now why the Secretary is desperate in trying to get this problem to go away. Sam Koim did presentation in Cairns about corruption. If there is nothing to hide why would the Secretary move his shares? The Secretary of Treasury dug a drainage where monies flowing to his own company. Does Pertusio have a contract to advise the Secretary of Treasury and if so how is this not corruption of the highest order for PMs chief economist in the country. Can Dairi Vele declare his interest and clear up why he insists on payment of interest in UBS loan. What was his role then and now and does it not amount to conflict of interest??
Posted on: Sat, 24 May 2014 06:46:30 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015