You should know and realize: The Qutbiyyah have tried for 23 - TopicsExpress



          

You should know and realize: The Qutbiyyah have tried for 23 years to try and bring down the noble Shaykh Imaam al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah) and his dawah ever since he pointed out the doctrine of Wahdat ul-Wujood in the commentary of Sayyid Qutb in az-Zilaal, which Qutb corroborated in his commentary on Surah al-Hadid and Surah al-Ikhlas in the late 1950s and remained upon this (after having negated it in the very first edition of az-Zilaal in the early 1950s in the very early part of his commentary). The formally declared war of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen against the revival of the Prophetic dawah began here. When an Imaam of the Sunnah, criticised the words of Sayyid Qutb the Ikhwan issued an organization wide boycott against Imaam al-Albani and his dawah and anyone who ascribed to it. And they started slandering Shaykh al-Albaani by publishing articles in their magazines such as the Kuwaiti al-Mujtama in order to make people flee from al-Albani and his dawah. The disclosure of this vile type of hizbiyyah and bigoted party-spirit was the starting point and the instigation of the giving of attention by the Scholars of the Sunnah to these people, their doctrines and methodologies. This led to - despite initial confusion - the gradual emergence of the clarity and separation between the methodology of the Prophets in calling to Allaah (based upon revelation from Allaah) and the methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen (derived from the prevailing secular, non-Muslim, ideologies, doctrines, philosophies, political methodologies and manifestos, the overall aim of which is to establish a khilaafah by hook or by crook, literally [its in their books]). Over the next two decades the Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah as a whole convicted the evil methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen in hundreds of their statements, verdicts and rulings, and the more outspoken of Qutbiyyah were left despised, abased, rejected (and rendered kafirs by a faction of their earlier followers who became disillusioned with what they perceived to be a sell-out). So some of them boasted about being instrumental in bringing Bush to power by advising the Muslims of America to vote him in (Dr. Hawali, the women and children of Iraq love you to bits), and others were found sitting alongside and calling for understanding with the Soofees and Shiites (thank you Salman al-Awdah, we always knew you had a Bannaawee thing going on there with your distinction between al-Firqat un-Najiyah and at-Taaifat ul-Mansoorah). After the Gulf War, these people came out and started on the other Major Scholars such as Ibn Baz, and Ibn Uthaymeen (rahimahumullaah), when they started to belittle these Scholars. Bigoted partisanship (hizbiyyah) is what led to these people to step up their war when others from the people of knowledge refuted Sayyid Qutb for his encyclopedia of innovations and misguidances which included Mockery of Moses (alayhis salaam), revilement of Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu), and Muaawiyah (radiallaahu anhu) and his Takfir of all of Bani Umayyah. His speaking with the innovations of the Jahmiyyah of negating Allaahs uluww, and making Taweel of al-Istwaa, and his innovations of Itizaal of rejecting aahaad hadeeth in aqidah, and his casting doubt upon the Sunnah, and statements reaching the level of kufr, and great many other affairs. Chief amongst those Scholars was Shaykh Rabee bin Haadee al-Madkhalee, and when he saw that these people, claiming Salafiyyah, did not make their walaa and baraa for the truth, and for the Salafi aqidah, but rather for the sake of a man in whose works - after you take out all of the above-mentioned misguidances - there is nothing left in them, except what is worse than the aqidah of the khawaarij, namely Takfir of the entire Ummah, and judging with its complete absence, and judging the Muslims to be upon the jaahiliyyah of kufr prior to Islaam, rather in a worse jaahiliyyah than that, and propounding the manifestos of secular atheist Jews in inciting violent revolutions against this Ummah: Then when he, Shaykh Rabee saw that, he was resolved to defend the honours of the Prophets, the Companions and the sanctity of the Islamic aqidah, and to protect the Muslims from the evil effects of this evil ideology which brought nothing upon this Ummah but calamity and destruction. So in turn, the Qutbiyyah set sail on their flag-ship, the Qutbiyyah in the early 1990s in order to wreak havoc, to cause confusion, to deceive and to wage a war against the methodology of the Prophets in calling to Allaah - after their first skirmish against the Imaam, the Muhaddith, the Reviver, Nasir ud-Din al-Albani in the late 1980s. These people did not traverse the methodology of the Prophets in calling to Allaah, rather they adopted the methodologies of Soofee, Ashari, Mutazili Innovators, Abu Alaa Mawdudi, Hasan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb - all of whom took the philosophies and ideologies of the non-Muslims, the Atheists, Secularists and Christians and incorporated them within their own ideas of what constitutes reform, writing in all of that, out of ignorance, mere opinion, far away from the aqidah of Islam and its Prophetic manhaj. And while this story is long and detailed, suffice it to say that the Qutbiyyah left no guile, trickery, or deception in trying to cause dissension between Shaykh Rabee and the other Scholars, as part of their evil plot, and as part of their defense of their vile methodologies of hizbiyyah which are alien to Islam and the Sunnah and the way of the Salaf, except that they traversed it. And from these ways was their constant calls to the people of knowledge, asking loaded questions, trying to elicit from them words of dispraise - and they found no way to defend their vile, innovated Ikhwani methodologies except to plot the downfall of the noble Scholars who defended the Islamic aqidah and the Salafi Manhaj from the doctrines and innovations of their figureheads. And we see instances of this being circulated today. They began with Shaykh al-Albani, then they moved onto the other major Scholars like Shaykh Ibn Baz, Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin after the Gulf War (when the Qutbiyyah made their debut, sailing on the seas), and then they turned to Shaykh Rabee thereafter. Be not deceived about these people - they hate the dawah and manhaj of Imaam al-Albani, Imaam Ibn Baz, and Imaam Ibn Uthaymin, even if they display their (fake) attachment to these scholars - its all in name only, theres nothing behind it of substance, for they are the furthest of people from the manhaj of these Shaykhs. All they do is to pick and choose from the sayings of these Scholars that suit their desires, they are not upon the dawah and methodology of these Shaykhs, they are upon the dawah of Hassan al-Banna, Qutb and Mawdudi. But when Shaykh Rabee stood to defend the Islamic aqidah and to defend the honours of the Companions, as had Mahmood Muhammad Shakir forty years earlier in 1952 (see here), then they used Shaykh Rabee as a scapegoat and as a veil to attack all of the Scholars. They hate all the Scholars, resent them and look down upon them, because none of these Scholars are with them upon their dawah, and because these Scholars actually recommended the books of refutation of Shaykh Rabee against Sayyid Qutb, and in his defending the methodology of the Prophets in dawah. But these haters, cant openly proclaim their resentment and hatred, because they know that most Muslims have an attachment and love to these Scholars, and so they conceal it so as not to alert the general people to what their harbor of such enmity. Even Shaykh Ibn Jibreen and Shaykh Bakr Abu Zaid (may Allaah have mercy upon them both) were not with these people upon their actual methodologies - even if they erred in the matter of defending Qutb or Banna. Look at how Shaykh Ibn Jibreen referred to these people (in this article here), Kharijite, Terrorist, Dogs of Hellfire - he is not with them upon their Takfir of the rulers and their Leninist revolutionary ideologies (see here), but they saw him slip by being deceived about the likes of Qutb and Banna, defending them erroneously, and so they took the slip of a scholar as a deen to be followed.
Posted on: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:23:52 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015