from Rourke(Plaintiff) v Peter ( Defendant) answer to Libel - TopicsExpress



          

from Rourke(Plaintiff) v Peter ( Defendant) answer to Libel lawsuit. Do you thing that I can win? This is what I replied...... c) The Facebook Page reported on and published relief aid, clothing drive, political and other pertinent information for and to fellow, burnt out victims and the public of Grandview Palace. The Page is the only means of information and communication for the victims of Grandview Palace fire and is a vital information source, like the press, for unit owners. This is the main reason that Plaintiffs (Rourke& Theodore) are trying so hard to destroy the only means of free communication and the only lifeline left for the Grandview Palace Public. Plaintiffs are attempting to destroy the free press of Grandview Palace by suing one of the Leaders and scaring others from public participation and petitioning. c) In fact, for a Judge and Lawyer to file such a frivolous SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) as this, speaks for itself as to their competency. Plaintiffs’ true motive is to quiet and silence the Facebook opposition, get them out of the way, destroy criticisms, stifle free speech and free and fair elections. Plaintiffs will do anything to maintain and secure their hold and grip on Grandview Palace’s $74,000,000.
Posted on: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:57:46 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015