hello my internation open minded friends and comunities of ancient origins and Archeology, and free thinking people who are interested in history as it has not been told, but screams in our facfes every day. just a thought here for discution....what if, and i am stating again, it is only a thought (i in no way identify myself with any form of racial idealism or politics in any form) what if the lost civilization wher a white continant? would that be the reason there are only (on global scale) a handful of white coucasian-(meaning people of the mountains of coucus-modern europe) in this world? and gigliotep (sorry for the spelling, kinda in a rush) was the last temple of, as sir handcock points out, of the world temple of rebirth and exchange (thats what i called it when it was found) i am not hinting the bullsh*t arean race (i am no racist) but maybe a continant oold world where blacks lived in cities as whites do nowe, so a basic flip of roles.....olmec xi times...and the people of the land like modern third world were the ones that survived because they were the farmers for the civilized city dwelling race? ...what if? please please please do not miss understand me...it is purely a question that built up in my mind after sir graham pointed out that modern concintration of life in cities are probably also the downfall, and that the farmers and bushmen would survive liklier. now i added the factor social idealism and role standards in development and power strugels, as well as global development ......i believe the self proclaimed master race (white) has always dominated, but being a minority, even though all ancient anything are always native darkskind or arabic dark skined or asian complexskin or aboriginal dark skin....and being tought all thies magical things from a handful of caoucasians-(agaIn...people of the mountain- olmec lore, noahs ark-mountain landing) is it just meor this making some kind of sence here? i stumbled upon the amazing documentation of the olmec people of south amerika, leading to poverty point...but, i am a very openminded person and combined sir grahams theories and studies and find they match to 10000000% with out them even knowing from each others work , at least as far as i know. thats what lead me to ask if anyone else has thought of this? overlap thies two theories and points of referances and artifacts as well as global positions and keep an open mind. please enjoy the journey into the past, and maybe the future of understanding. trs https://youtube/watch?v=_jk_3VmRSY8
Posted on: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:12:37 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015