latest information coming-in has it that the initial non-partisan commission of enquiry to delve into the brazil debacle,has now been replaced the a presidential commission of inquiry. now,the truth about presidential commission of inquiry is that,evidence of corruption or any other impropriety that comes to light during proceedings cannot be used in prosecuting the culprits,according to our statutes;and if you will all cast your minds back,this is what happened in the case ghana@50 where the ndc government wanted to prosecute the likes of mr kojo mpiani and dr charles wereko-brobbey with evidence given at a presidential commission of inquiry. however, the legal team of these personalities,led by yoni kulendi, drew governments attention to the fact that people appear before presidential commission of inquiries as witnesses and therefore a witness evidence cannot be used to incriminate and prosecute him in a court of law. so the question is; if the John Dramani Mahama-led ndc government is aware of this factually factual fact,then,what exactly is the rational behind coming-up with this presidential commission of inquiry if indeed,the president is serious to dig-up the rot that took place in brazil and commensurately punish the culprits?
Posted on: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 13:21:47 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015