n excerpt from The ArxBy Arcades Cinza. ..... If the electron does not crash into atomic nuclei then what of the space between the nucleus of an atom and the electron cloud? Just as gravity affects spacetime, the so-called strong force is similar to gravity in that it is a spatial propagation. The present scientific interpretation of the strong force states the strong force as the collective comprisement of propagated gluons. There is not a scientist that can tell the exact logic behind the apparent propagation of force from matter being innate- the how and why are scientifically inexplainable . You will hear that that is just the way it is, and you will be introduced to post facto descriptions and calculations. However, in absolute physics, the strong force is as spatially composite as gravity. Gravitys curvature of spacetime is many times less intense than the Strong force spacetime curvature . People will ask how does this correspond to the shorter range of the strong force - why cant a quark attract a macrocosmic object? Firstly we have to imagine the incredible energetic intensity that characterized the state of the universe at the time of the creation of the quark , and how definite as an object the quark is compared to macrocosmic objects, specifically the capacity for appearance; secondly there is specificity of curvature. If we take a look at macrocosmic objects we see the indiscriminate attraction of gravity at work , attempting at any object that enters its field. Dissimilarly , the quark , a rudimentarier objective state, propagates a more selective spatial curvature that interlocks best , though not perfect , with the spatial propagation of other quarks(never perfect because quarks , and no other elementary particle aswell, are not created in pairs, but rather in subsequence in a circumstance that was losing capacity to continue the materialization of quarks ) , and the measure of discordance that negates the perfect interlock equals the materialization of gluons , appearing to be particles in transfer when in fact gluons are pushing elementary particles apart . This is how the atom is able of splitting. Technically, from an energetic standpoint, given the trend of the ongoing big bang release , retrograde objects such as the human should not be able to separate a construct as elementary as the atom- naturally this is not supposed to happen, except there being a rudimentary facilitation to compensate for the lack of the producability of the energetic intensity required.Even then a complex Chain reaction is required before getting to the first atom in the sequence to actually split open . We can go further to posit that after quarks become interlocked there arises a new collective spatial propagation that equals the space between the atomic nucleus, and orbiting electrons. Now this new collective spatial propagation must remain in constant change given that gluons remain in constant transfer . This constant, active, maintenance of energetic and composite balance results in the materialization of the seemingly erratically located electron . The gluon result from the interface of two or more quarks, nuetrons , or protons Now what this would mean is that the space of the coverage of the nucleus that is not the coverage that is adjoining particles,express possibly a remaining ,a modified spatial impact ,for the materialization of the gluon therefore it would take greater distance for the materialization of a secondary manifestation-the electron- that moves in balance with the transfer of gluons , therefore the electron hovers in an orbital fashion, or what seems like an orbital fashion; but as any credible scientist will admit, point particles are not actually set side by side per se- physically speaking the setting of two elementary particles to a perfect geometric interface. Therefore when you are told that gluons keep protons and nuetrons together, and quarks together, it is a generalization of the truth for the sake of three dimensional depictivity. During propagation the gluon is actually transfering openfaced.....
Posted on: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 06:33:43 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015