the current naat culture is moving ahlus sunnah further away from ilm and shariah. --- ala Hazrat ruling in nazarana --- Q u e s t i o n Zayd sets his rate as 5 rupees to perform in a Mawlid, and will not go to perform in anyones Mawlid without being paid his fee of 5 rupees. A n s w e r The rates which Zayd has set for him to perform and sing in gatherings are impermissible and harām. It is by no means permissible for him to accept it, and the food purchased with such income is explicitly harām. It is wājib [necessary] that he recollects exactly from whom he accepted such fees and return it to each and every one of them. If they are no longer alive, he must ensure it reaches their inheritors, and if he is unable to find them, he must distribute an equivalent amount of money amongst the poor and needy. If he repents from such impermissible income in the future then he is free of sin. Firstly, the noble mention of the Master of the Universe ﷺ is from amongst the loftiest expressions of obedience and the most majestic acts of worship, and to charge fees for obedience and worship is harām. Secondly, it is apparent from the wording of the questioner that the fee he charges is for his poetic recital and singing, which in itself is clearly impermissible. It is written in Fatāwā ʿĀlamgīrī – Singing and poetic recitals are such actions that it is impermissible for anyone to claim a wage for them. — Imām Ahmad Ridā Khān al-Qādirī radi Allahu anho
Posted on: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:25:13 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015