who will pay the price for failing topple assad regime...? The US Administration, which does not base its actions on negotiations but rather on the facts on ground, was lately convinced that its only way out of the regional failure it had fell into was through Tehran. According to a report by Dr. Hussein Khalil, this is because Iran has wide influence in Iraq and good relations in Afghanistan. It is the number one ally of Syria which has stood firmly in the face of global assaults, and it is a supporter of the resistance movements which changed power equations in Lebanon and Palestine. Moreover, Tehran is accused of stimulating the Houthis file in Yemen, as it sympathizes with the wide public opposition’s demands in Bahrain, at a time when the US-Western bets on regional allies failed for over two years in toppling Syria. At this point, the Iranians did not exaggerate when talking about a serious “approach”, as the Iranian Foreign Ministry rushed after the phone call between Obama and Rouhani to assure that this did not mean normalizing relations between the two countries. Then Imam Khamenei’s statement came out to reassure that the “US Administration is untrustworthy… and it is a promise breaker,” and that the Iranian people have proved firmness in defending their rights and benefits, as well as their desire for peaceful coexistence.The regional affairs expert explains that the US-Iran relations include two axes: Stances and benefits. He assures that the first axis is suspended because it only leads to a dead end, for neither the US Administrations is ready to abandon the Zionist benefits, nor Iran is ready to abandon the Palestinian cause and resistance movements. Therefore, the two parts are convinced today that any understanding would be based on an agreement on the benefits of both countries first, to establish a wider understanding later on. Hence, Moussawi indicates that the pre-Geneva 2 period is more important than any announcement that will be made during the conference, as the results of the international conference are being arranged today, and the conference is only a chance to make the statement in and take memorial photos. Rouhani’s visit in return for excluding Bandar and Faysal “Many of those who awaited the Tomahawk missiles, as a punishment to the Syrian regime and a letter to the nuclear enriching Iranian regime, were trembled by the “phone call” news.” This is what General Manager of Al-Arabiya news channel Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed wrote in the Saudi Asharq Al-Awsat, clarifying that the “phone call” trembled decision making centers in the Gulf, Jordan, Turkey, Israel, and others.” Bandar and FaisalThe statement was followed by information revealed by Israeli Channel Two about a Gulf-Zionist meeting held in Tel Aviv. This information was later supported as media published the names of the Gulf delegation, which included: Saudi Intelligence Chief, Bandar Bin Sultan, National Security Advisor and Deputy Chief of Executive Council in Abu Dhabi, Hazza bin Zayed Al-Nahyan, in addition to Bahrain Intelligence Chief, General Adel bin Khalifa Al-Fadhel, who is one of the Gulf intelligence officers with the strongest ties with the “Mossad”. In the same context, Saudi Foreign Minister Saud Al-Faisal’s refusal to read the kingdom’s annual speech in the US General Assembly, was also considered a clear message of objection to the US approach towards Iran.Failure of plot against Syria requires retirement of Bandar The Iranians are aware today of their strong position after the failure of conspirators against Syria in toppling the regime and President Bashar Al-Assad. In addition, Syria is witnessing today a battle between armed opposition factions, especially between the so-called “Free Syrian Army” supported by Turkey and Islamic brigades supported by Saudi intelligence. This clash translates Turkey’s dissension from Qatar on one hand, and Saudi Arabia on the other. Moussawi reassures that the conflict between opposition factions in Syria is deadly, and clashes between them are fiercer than those they engaged in with the Syrian Army. Moreover, he considers that the military conflict raged today were over who would represent the opposition in any coming settlement, after Saudi took control over the “Syrian Coalition” headed by its man Ahmad Al-Jarba, and excluded Qatar’s man Mouaz Al-Khatib. Bandar Bin Sultan thinks that the more he succeeded in “crushing” the “Free Syrian Army” and controlling crossings joining the Syrian territories with Turkey, Iraq, and Jordan, the more he would keep himself a role in the negotiations. The intensified battles on ground and the control of Islamic brigades (Daesh, Islamic Army, Al-Nusra Front …) confirm information published earlier by British writer Robert Fisk, about talks, between members of the “Free Syrian Army” and a high-leveled source close to President Bashar Al-Assad, on possible negotiations between the government and “FSA” who believes in a Syrian solution for the war. The information was followed by news about members of the “Free Syrian Army” handing themselves as well as Armed Turkish factions fighting Islamic brigades over to the Syrian Army. Deadly clashes today come after the failure of both axes in establishing the slogans they’ve raised in their war on Syria, for neither the Syrian Army collapsed, nor President Assad stepped down, or Syria abandoned the choice of resistance. Now who will pay the price for the failure of toppling Syria?Turkey failed… and Qatar is paying the price! Regarding Turkey, expert in Turkish affairs, Dr. Mohammad Noureddine considered that Turkey had set its goal since the beginning of the Syrian crisis, which was the fall of President Bashar Al-Assad. Hence, any settlement that excludes the fall of Assad will be a clear failure for Turkey. Mohammad NoureddineDr. Noureddine agrees with analyses that say that Turkey is among the major losers in the region, especially after the fall of the Muslim Brotherhood rule in Egypt. Speaking to Al-Manar website, he adds that “Erdogan’s government has lost the Kurds inside and outside Turkey because of its support to militants who clashed with the Kurds in Syria. It also lost an entire axis on the political, public, and social levels (Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran), it lost a public trust which is hard to repair.” However, Turkey’s greatest loss, according to Dr. Noureddine, would be if the Syrian crisis’s repercussions moved strongly inside Turkey, “especially if Al-Qaeda and its allies were one side of the clash in Turkey”. In this context, analysts agree that Qatar was the “biggest loser” in this project. “It was handed a mission, and when Qatar failed in performing its role in it, it had to suffer defeat,” Lebanese political analyst Hussein Khalil says. KUDOS...:)
Posted on: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:53:51 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015