युगपुरुष लोकमान्य टिळक - TopicsExpress



          

युगपुरुष लोकमान्य टिळक या चित्रपटाच्या आणि त्या वरील wow च्या प्रतिक्रियनच्या निमित्ताने. . याला उकरून काढणे असं म्हणत असाल तर मग चित्रपटाला ऐतिहासिक नसून काल्पनिक म्हणून असं स्पष्टपणे declare करा. अर्धसत्य हे संपूर्ण खोटच नाही का? 1890 - Opposed to use Congress pendal for Social Conference 1889 - 91 - Opposed Age of Consent Bill, supported the Orthodox people and Criticized Ranade, Telang and Bhandarkar as vidya alankrut durjan (learned wicked) 1891 - Opposed Ranade in Social Conference at Nagpur 1915 - Tilak opposed the Age of Consent Bill, brought in by Shastri, to raise the minimum Age for marriage. 1918 - He opposed, a Bill by Vithalbhai Patel, to legalize the inter-caste marriages. He described such marriages as hindu-hindu che sankar karak vivah. He declared the Bill to be against Hindu religion and said that the progeny of such marriages may inherit the property of father only and not of others. A Brahmin looses his brahmin-hood, if he marries a shudra woman, he opined. The problem of untouchables should be and can be solved early politically or socially. The Shudras have the same rights as those of Brahmins, Ksatriyas and Vaishyas, But they should not utter Vedic mantras. If the God himself observes untouchability, I will not consider him God. This is a custom started by Brahmins in olden days. After the speech, 250 leaders published a declaration taking a vow that they will not observe untouchability in their own day to day personal lives. Tilak refused to sign on this declaration. Tilak, who defined Hindu as one who recognizes authority of Vedas, blamed Shahu asking rights for Vedic rites. Tilak supported the Purohit, Rajopadhye, and threatened to seek redress from sovereign British power, and also threatened of caste riots. He denounced the right of kings to stop income of Brahmins and also criticized Gaekwad, the Maharaja of Baroda, saying that these kings have no right to meddle in the affairs of god and religion and that a few trips to England do not make them competent to speak on these matters. When Rajopadhye did not relent, Shahu forfeited his vatan. Rajopadhye appealed to the British authorities, who turned it down at all levels.
Posted on: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 17:22:26 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015