ATTENTION PERSONAL INJURY/CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS, CORPORATE EXECUTIVES/BUSINESS OWNERS: Over the years, I had the pleasure on sitting in on trials to assist my clients in cross examining OTHER Self-Proclaimed Security Experts & Fraud Examiners (personal injury, negligent security, premises liability, Intent to Commit Financial Misappropriation, etc.). There are THREE (3) areas where Other Self-Proclaimed Safety/Security Experts & Fraud Examiners Fail to recognize when providing their testimony that can be an Advantage to YOU & Damaging to Opposing counsel: 1) Safety & Security, Fraud Detection & Determination/Compliance is NOT a Science. Safety & Security Assessments/Fraud Examinations are Pro-Active Strategies to contribute in ways to detect, deter and/or reduce the Probability of an event (potential crime). 2) Strategies VS Theories?? A Theory in Safety & Security and Financial Fraud is an Unreasonable/Unrealistic across the board Standard of care that CAN NOT be applied to ALL Safety, Security, and Fraud Professions. Strategies CAN BE APPLIED in a Reasonable & Realistic way in ALL Safety, Security, and Fraud professions. 3) Self-Policing VS Public Policing? One is a Discretionary Security Measure, the other is a Standard of Care Consult with "THE WORST" Criminologist (Safety-Security Expert & Fraud Examiner) in the Country! MEET RON WORST!! FraudAndSecurityExperts/Ron_Worst_CV.pdf RonWorstCriminologist.wordpress YouTube/user/CriminologistRWorst
Posted on: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:25:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015