Another good example of what was previously discussed, the conflation of meanings of words to benefit the status quo. Conditioning people to not allow other people to define their words as they see fit, so that effective communication of ideas becomes impossible. You do not have to agree on a definition of a word, everyone can have their own. Arguing semantics is no different than a character assassination, as words are an integral part of the way a character expresses their ideas. In this example much conflation is going on, the conflation of the real and the imaginary, chiefly among them. Government and unjust action are used in the same sentence. Government being an idea in the minds of men, it cannot take action, as only individuals can act. An unjust action and an involuntary action are descriptors used by people to express an idea. There is no debate because ideas are rejected in favor of arguing over semantics of a vague idea called government, which has as many definitions as there are people on the planet.
Posted on: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:52:50 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015