Another thought from my upcoming due process and procedure book: ================================================== What has made it possible for the courts of our legal system, once at least trying to appear to be based upon truly serving justice through the earnest seeking of facts and evidence consistent with the truth, to devolve into the logically inept, legally ignorant, morally & ethically bankrupt, hypocritical, and judicially elitist bottomless pits of tyranny and despair of our modern times? Overall, the answer is logically simple enough. Almost any lawyer you encounter would be perfectly willing to sell out everyone he knows, every client he has, and every moral and ethical ideal he ever held, in pursuit of power, fame, and the almighty dollar. And while this is basically true of many occupations in America these days, I find consolation in the thought that there is a collection of especially heinous pits in Hell reserved for bankers, politicians, lawyers, and judges of the sort described above. Virtually all lawyers are unethical and immoral elitist but cowardly scumbags who operate in either total fear of or in direct courtroom partnership with judges for their whole career (at least until they can become one themselves). Meanwhile, virtually all municipal and justice court judges are either little political control-freak trolls with the IQ of a moldy dish sponge, having absolutely no legal skills, knowledge, understanding, experience, or training of any kind, having only run for a judgeship because they had way too much time on their hands and no one to forcibly boss around, or, theyre practicing/ex-lawyers whove become statist worshipping power drunk tyrants with elitist visions of grandiose power and self-importance. The latter assertion becoming only more true the higher up in the judicial hierarchy you progress. Couple all of that that with the fact that both classes are equally ignorant of the actual written laws they pretend to know and understand, preferring instead to substitute them with their own legalistic pontifications and interpretations. Pontifications and interpretations which are almost always based solely on their own personal opinions of how things should and would operate if they were in complete control of all things law and legal. Added all together, you now have a recipe for a judicial disaster of gargantuan proportions that will eventually manifest itself into the cesspool we have come to know today as the American system of “law. Thanks to lawyers and judges, it is a daily event in every state of the union that, individual Americans are accused of crimes and then forced under threats of duress and authoritarian coercion to appear before a small cabal of bureaucratic elitists and a bunch of legally ignorant total strangers who think all rights are government granted. The usually equally legally ignorant accused individuals are then compelled by more threats, coercive tactics, legal half-truths, and fraudulent omissions, to agree to waive virtually every one of their fundamental and due process rights and answer to accusations of administrative infractions fraudulently characterized as criminal wrongdoing. This so-called wrongdoing is allegedly perpetrated against a political fiction that doesnt actually exist, also known in law as a legal person, legal entity, or simply a person. And it is certainly of no little importance to understand that an accused individual cannot compel the appearance or production of this legal person for the purpose of examination, nor can they compel proof of standing by this legal “person” through sworn testimony, nor can they even compel production of actual evidence demonstrating that this legal person suffered any palpable harm at all for which this accused individual is liable and accountable. Furthermore, the entire accusation and claim process is initiated, directed, prosecuted, and presided over by a small tight-knit group of individuals acting entirely as 3rd-party complainants on behalf of this legal person they all claim exists and now has legal recourse against the accused individual. This tribunal operates virtually isolated from truth and justice within its own little legal fiefdom that swallows up not only the body and livelihood, both also the fundamental and due process rights of anyone unlucky enough to be accused and caught up in the revenue enhancement vortex that reaches out for miles from the center of its corporate maw. The accused individual is eventually forced to defend themselves from one or more arbitrary and capricious accusations of breaking some even more arbitrary administrative rule or regulation, which they may or may not actually be aware of, or that actually might not even exist at all, and totally regardless of which, virtually never applies in the first place to the individual being accused of violating it. Now, it doesnt seem to really bother many folks that sit on juries that all of the members of this little cabal have direct personal financial benefits involved in achieving a specific outcome at the end of this entire process. A process whereby these 3rd party complainants are free to allege virtually any presumptuous and unproven facts they desire, while simultaneously ignoring required procedures intended to protect the rights of the accused against the very arbitrary exercises of power that is currently underway against them. Far more often than not, these 3rd party complainants invent all sorts of unlawful and legally non-existent procedures-within-procedures, and then pay it lip-service by trying to pass it off as proper, fair and impartial due process, regardless of whatever their own pre-existing procedural and regulatory rules might actually require be done. This is sometimes referred to as local rules of court. For those that have been subjected to and victimized by it, it is more aptly known as the local schemes to thwart justice and the rights of due process. As Voltaire stated “In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one class of citizens to give to another.” I have made it a personal mission in life to ensure that I am better educated and knowledgeable in the art of criminal legal due process and the rules of procedure that control it than those that I must face off against in the legal arena. I have tried to pattern that drive and ability to learn and apply based upon yet another statement of Voltaire’s “I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: ‘O Lord make my enemies ridiculous.’ And God granted it.”
Posted on: Mon, 19 May 2014 23:47:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015