[Copied] I see a lot of people talk and discuss the legal and - TopicsExpress



          

[Copied] I see a lot of people talk and discuss the legal and moral issues that surround state abduction in the UK. One thing I would like you all to think about is the law stripped back to its bare bones. The United Kingdom is a corporation PLC, see dun and Bradstreet. Humans Can only deal with a corporation through consent and contract. So, any dealings you have with the government, and its services, including social services is through consent and contract. Contract Law is therefore the highest authority in any dealings you have with the UK SS. Now, here comes the crunch part. When you child is born, you duly take them to a registry office, register the birth and are given a birth certificate. What is the purpose of this? If you failed to do it would the child cease to exist? Would they vanish in a puff of smoke? Under contract law, a certificate is a document of ownership. The registration of birth is YOUR consent, given in signatory to the UK to take ownership of the child. Yes you read that right. YOU sign ownership of your child to the Crown. Look on the birth certificate, its says copyright of the crown. Because the UK is a corporation they have to dupe the humans around to enter contract with them, they do this by getting you to consent, by registering your child, like a piece of machinery has a registration, and issuing your with a certificate, to tell you you can now look after that piece of machinery but hey, you neglect it, it belongs to us, we can take it off you whenever we like, its ours, we own it. And that ladies and gents is why the hoax and elaborate statutes exist, so the the UKPLC whose politicians are actually company directors, can come and seize your children. For more info, google/ youtube, strawman, freemanoftheland, or visit FMOTL and your strawman
Posted on: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:21:31 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015