El-Rufai wins again at the Court of Appeal: Court of Appeal: No statute is capable of abridging fundamental rights - by: Muyiwa Adekeye Abuja, 31 March 2014: Mallam Nasir el Rufai secured another victory in court today. The Court of Appeal set aside the judgment of a Federal High Court which had in 2010 thrown out his fundamental human rights enforcement case against the Senate. Ruling in El Rufais favour, the Court of Appeal directed the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court to appoint another judge to hear the case. The original suit was filed in August 2008 to challenge the decisions and recommendations of the Senate committee established to hold investigative public hearings on the affairs of the FCT between 1999 and 2007, but which essentially targeted El Rufai. That committee invited El Rufai as a witness and not as a defendant. But in its report, the committee went ahead to recommend punishment and other sanctions against El Rufai without making available to him the petitions against him, or placing before him any instances of violations of the law for his response. By acting in this prejudicial manner, the Senate committee, and eventually the entire Senate in accepting the committees recommendations, had violated El Rufais constitutionally guaranteed rights. El Rufai therefore approached the courts to defend and uphold his rights. He sued the Senate and five other parties: the Senate president, Senator Sodangi, the Clerk of the National Assembly, the Minister of the FCT and the Attorney-General of the Federation. The respondents did not dispute the substance of these rights violations but they resorted to legal technicalities. They told the trial court that El Rufais legal action came too late because it was not filed within three months of the commencement of the breach as required by the Public Officers Protection Act. They further claimed that all the defendants are public officers, and are therefore protected by the Act against such actions. Justice M. G. Umar agreed with their arguments. On 11 March 2010, he declined to hear the substantive case of the violation of El Rufais fundamental rights, deciding that it was statute-barred. Bamidele Aturu, counsel to El Rufai, disagreed and lodged an appeal at the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, in April 2010. After four years of legal arguments, the court of appeal decided the appeal today. The panel of three justices unanimously decided that the trial judge erred in ruling that any statute is capable of abridging fundamental rights. They therefore allowed the appeal and directed that the suit be remitted back to another judge of the Federal High Court to hear the substantive suit. El Rufai welcomed the decision. This judgment is another contribution to human rights jurisprudence in this country. We are gratified that the Court of Appeal saw through attempts by public officers to avoid responsibility for their abuse of the rights of citizens using various stratagems. Signed Muyiwa Adekeye 31 March 2014
Posted on: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:31:01 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015