Friday, January 2nd, 2015 | Posted by RJ Harley G Lappin Memo Slip – Title 18 UnConstitutional Tony Davis Jan 1, 2015 Subject: Title 18 UnConstitutional MorningLiberty A few months ago Tony Davis discovered the largest cover-up in Department of Justice (DOJ) history. The cover-up is responsible for thousands of people being illegally imprisoned and for the illegal prosecution of thousands more. This case is now in the Supreme Court and you have a very limited time to join the Petition. On July 27, 2009, Harley G. Lappin issued an Internal Memorandum to staff from his email address, [email protected], stating that because of the large amount of requests for administrative relief related to Title 18 (Public Law 80-772), the federal Criminal Code, that he had commenced an investigation by the Office of Special Counsel (DOJ), the clerk of the House of Representatives, and the National Archives to determine if Title 18 was unconstitutional. The investigation determined that indeed, Title 18 was [is] unconstitutional. Title 18 includes 18 U.S.C. §3231, which is the only statute allowing prosecution of any federal crime, including Title 21 and Title 26. Based on the investigation, Lappin went on to state that the House of Representatives had violated the Quorum Clause of the Constitution when the House voted 38 to 6 for passage when a quorum required 218 votes. The quorum issue is governed by Article I, Section 5, Clause 1, of the Constitution and the only Supreme Court case to rule on the Quorum Issue, United States v. Balin, Joseph & Co., 144 U.S. 1, 3 (1892). On December 8, 2010, under pressure from the DOJ, Lappin issued a Declaration under the penalty of perjury in federal court in New York claiming he never issued the Memorandum. Lappin was then forced to resign. Within the last few months the evidence has been uncovered that the DOJ engaged in a massive cover-up to conceal their investigation so people could not use it to have their case dismissed pretrial or to be removed from prison based on a claim of actual innocence after trial. The cover-up began in 2008 when the DOJ investigation started. The cover-up violates numerous criminal statutes as well as Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and the Clean Hands Doctrine. In the last few months, we have had witnesses come forward and prepare affidavits stating they had received a copy of the Lappin Memorandum from the Warden in their prison. We now have 2 affidavits and have identified 1,800 people in one prison that attended a town hall meeting where the warden passed out a copy of the Memorandum. We are looking for other witnesses. The petition has passed the lower courts and the Supreme Court accepted it as Docket No. 14-527 on November 7, 2014. The government waived argument on November 21, 2014. The court sent it to the judges on December 3, 2014 for review on January 9, 2014. In the petition, two questions are presented to the Supreme Court: QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Can a lower district or appellate court overrule Article I, Section 5, Clause 1 (the quorum clause) of the Constitution and the only Supreme Court ruling on the quorum clause, United States v. Balin, Joseph & Co., 144 U.S 1, 3 (1892) (in order for any bill to be valid the Journals of both Houses must show it was passed in the presence of a Quorum)? 2. Can a federal district or appellate court participate in and conceal a DOJ cover-up where the Director of the BOP issues a Memorandum on July 27, 2009 after review by the Office of the Special Counsel, the Clerk of the House, and the National Archives declaring that Public Law 80-772 is unconstitutional, in violation of the Quorum Clause of the Constitution? We are currently allowing people to join the petition prior to the court’s review. The objective, whether pre-trial, during trial, or post-trial is a Ruling of Actual Innocence. Once you receive an Actual Innocence Ruling, you should have the right to claim damages. With Best Regards, Yours in Freedom, Michael Edward 800-625-4250 > p.s. While I have your attention, please look at GrassfireCommunications – it’s the Game Changer for all of us. > Michael Edward here from AmericansRestoringAmerica. ARA has over 25,000 in membership and 30 some websites under it’s umbrella. One of the web sites under it’s umbrella is YourRemedyIsInTheLaw, which has over 9,000 in membership, 30 Information Providers to teach the YRIITL membership and has been on the internet since 2005. One of YRIITL’s Information Providers, Mr. Tony Davis, presently has one of his Students before The United States Supreme Court. The outcome of this litigation could positively affect millions of Americans who are presently serving time or have served time in the past in federal prison. One of the most important petitions in history is scheduled to be heard by the chief justices of the Supreme Court of the United States on January 9, 2014. It is imperative that the justices understand the significance of the petition to insure that they will hear the petition. The docket number is 14-527, David Moleski v. United States. The case has been docketed and the government has already waived argument. The judges are scheduled to hear it on January 9, 2015. We are requesting that you immediately write a letter supporting that the Court hear the petition. A cover sheet sample about the SCOTUS letter to forward to your Address Book is found here. A sample letter to SCOTUS to go with the cover sheet sample is found here. A sample of The Flyer to share with others who may want to benefit from this litigation is found here. The Flyer is commercial and you may or may not want to publish it. What The Flyer offers is the ability to join this petition before SCOTUS. The cost to join this litigation is $5,000.00. The cost to send a letter to The Supreme Court of the United States is your time, paper, envelope and a stamp. On one hand you wouldn’t want to publish the flyer as you are not being paid to publish it. On the other hand you would want to publish the flyer because those who are joined to the action will reap the benefit of Mr. Davis’ ten plus years in this effort and I’m confident you would want to share that opportunity just as you would point a thirsty man to where he may drink water. Your call . . . . Regardless of your joining this litigation, please send your letter to SCOTUS, attached. BENJAMIN FULFORD UPDATE Dec 30 2014 Posted on December 31, 2014 by David Robinson December 30, 2014 The year 2014 was a nasty one for the Nazionist cabal controlled G7 nations and their shrinking coterie of slave states. Now, the Pentagon is preparing to take the restored Republic of the United States of America into the 188 nation BRICS alliance, a move that would effectively and permanently end cabal rule, according to CIA sources. If cabal rule ends, then a jubilee (a one-time write off of all debts public and private), asset redistribution and a massive push to save the planet will make 2015, the year of the sheep in the Chinese Zodiac, the year of the sheeple. > The latest offensive against cabal rule has resulted in 30 arrests of senior officials in Israel timesofisrael/police-arrest-30-in-high-level-government-corruption-bust/?utm_source=The+Times+of+Israel+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=dcfad8de7b-2014_12_24&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_adb46cec92-dcfad8de7b-54923773 the disqualification of Benyamin Netanyahu by his own political party jpost/Israel-Elections/Likud-comptroller-disqualifies-Netanyahu-from-Likud-leadership-race-PM-likely-to-appeal-385611 and the fleeing of top Nazionist ruler George Bush Sr. into a hospital to avoid arrest on charges of ordering the murder of President John F. Kennedy and war crimes, including mass murder. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2885883/Former-President-George-H-W-Bush-90-rushed-hospital-shortness-breath.html Last week also saw the presentation of evidence indicating the committee of 300, that is supposed to be the secret government of the planet, is losing power. The evidence came in the form of the document that can be seen at the 14 minute mark of this video clip. We have confirmed from MI5 sources that the document shown is a real committee of 300 document issued in 2010 and signed by, among others, Queen Elizabeth, the head of the committee. It is not the still mysterious document signed by Crown Prince William in Washington earlier this month. This document discusses the distribution of 48 trillion US dollars to a series of established power centers. The percentages each group gets indicate where the real power lies in the secret government. The biggest share, 20% or $9.6 trillion, goes to the “financial agencies of the United Nations,” such as the World Bank Group, the IMF, the International Finance Corporation, the BIS, the Bank of England and the Bank of China. In other words, the bankers get the biggest slice. Next we see that the UN, the ASBLP group (Philippines), the United Kingdom, China and the Chinese Dragon (royal) family each get 10% or $4.8 trillion. Then, further down the totem pole we see that Queen Elizabeth, the European Union, the Federal Reserve Board, the committee of 300, the Vatican and the “international authorities who signed this,” each get 4% or $1 trillion 920 billion. Think about it, the Federal Reserve Board, the people who own the US corporate government, only get 4%. Finally some people code named WZH and ASM get 3% and 2% respectively. A final one percent goes into some sort of savings fund. The first thing to note is that the United Nations takes top position but the head of the UN is selected by hidden rulers using a secret process. The hidden rulers are almost certainly the usual suspects: the Rockefellers, Bushes, Rothschilds etc. The next thing we need to pay attention to is who is not on this document including Russia, Africa, India, South America, Japan, Germany etc. The final thing to notice is that if all this money had really been disbursed in 2010, then the world would be a much better place than it actually is. According to UN estimates, it would only take $400 billion to stop environmental destruction and $200 billion to end poverty. That means these groups could save the world and still have $47.4 trillion to spend on luxury yachts etc. Clearly either this money remains frozen and the document failed to release funds or else the money was not spent on this planet. No other explanation makes sense. In any case, in order to start cleaning up the mess the Nazionists have made of this planet, we will have to keep chipping away at the visible aspects of their control. One case in point is Barack Obama, president of the bankrupt US corporate government. This is the man who tried to orchestrate massive US race riots through his Ferguson campaign. More recently, Obama publicly lied on behalf of a Sony movie marketing campaign when he blamed North Korea for the recent so-called hacker attack against Sony Pictures. He also publicly called for the release of a movie depicting the murder of the current ruler of a sovereign nation. Obama spent last Saturday playing golf in Hawaii with Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak. Apparently Razak failed to please Obama because while he was visiting the US, Malaysia was hit with severe floods and, as soon as he returned home, a third Malaysia airliner vanished. Now e-mails are being sent to this writer claiming the third vanished plane will be used for a nuclear terror attack in the Ukraine. We cannot verify this but, clearly some trouble makers are still on the loose. Nuclear reactors in both South Korea and the Ukraine, for example, appear to be under some sort of stuxnet virus attack. The ISIS campaign is also still fizzing along, albeit at a slowing pace. The trouble in the Ukraine is also still burbling but there, too, the killing seems to be slowing down drastically. The attack on Russia’s economy has now stopped, having failed to even come close to its goal of regime change there. Now there are growing reports of unrest in the US and the open stealing of citizens’ money by government goons. This is a sign of a terminally ill regime headed for complete collapse. The issue to pay attention to in the New Year is whether the US corporate government can meet the upcoming series of payments deadlines. The first is the December 31st year end accounts settling. Then there is another big accounting deadline on January 31st. Japanese slave Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is now frantically looting Japan’s savings to try to help his masters meet that deadline. The latest move he announced, having looted the pension fund, is a plan to steal postal savings. You can be sure his next move will be to try to drain the Norinchukin Agricultural bank. Drug money from Afghan heroin and South American cocaine is also keeping the US corporation on life support. The recent agreement to end the US embargo on Cuba is also almost certainly connected to some sort of funds release. The real question, of course, is when will the Chinese and Arabs, the worlds’ biggest creditors, finally pull the plug on the goons in Washington D.C. and their secret UN masters. The other big question is when will the US military take action to restore the Republic? On this end, we are hearing many reports that patriotic elements of the US military industrial complex are on the move. Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment AFFIDAVIT – The “Credit River Decision” Posted on December 31, 2014 by David Robinson AFFIDAVIT The “Credit River Decision” STATE OF MAINE ) ) ss. County of Cumberland ) COMES NOW, David Robinson, the natural living flesh and blood man, a peaceful American National on the land, under oath, who states that the following information is of his own personal knowledge and belief. Almost 50 years ago, in 1968, in Credit River Township, Minnesota, the finding commonly referred to as the “Credit River Decision” of the landmark court case, First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota, vs. Jerome Daly, held the Federal Reserve Act to be unconstitutional and void. This decision, which is legally sound, declared in effect, that all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and State bonds held by Federal Reserve National and State Banks to be null and void for lack of consideration. This amounts to the emancipation of all Americans from personal, national and state debt, purportedly owed to the Federal Reserve Bank. Every American owes it to himself, his country, and to the people of the world, to study and understand this decision, for upon this decision hangs the question of freedom or slavery for the world. On May 8, 1964, Mr. Jerome Daly executed a Note and Mortgage to the First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota, which is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Both banks are privately owned and are a part of the Federal Reserve Banking System. In the spring of 1967, Mr. Jerome Daly was in arrears $476.00 in the payments on this Note and Mortgage. The Note was secured by a Mortgage on real property in Spring Lake Township in Scott County, Minnesota. The Bank foreclosed by advertisement and bought the property at a Sheriff’s Sale held on June 26, 1967. Mr. Jerome Daly made no further payments after June 26, 1967 and did not redeem within the 12 month period of time alloted by law after the Sheriff’s Sale. The bank brought an action to recover possession of the property to the Justice of the Peace Court at Savage, Minnesota. The first 2 Justices were disqualified by Affidavit of Prejudice; the first by Mr. Daly, the second by the bank, and a third judge refused to handle the case. It was then sent, pursuant to law, to Martin V. Mahoney, Justice of the peace, Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota, who presided at a Jury trial on December 7, 1968. The Jury found the Note and Mortgage to be void for failure to give any validity to the Sheriff’s Sale. The Verdict was for Mr. Daly with costs in the amount of $75.00. The acting President of the Bank, Mr. Lawrence V. Morgan, admitted that the Bank created the money and credit upon its books by which it acquired or gave as consideration for the Note; that this was standard banking practice; that the credit first came into existence when they created it; that he knew of no United States Statute which gave them the right to do this, and that this is the universal practice of these banks. Mr. Lawrence V. Morgan appeared at the trial on December 7, 1968 and was perceived to be candid, open, direct, experienced, and truthful. He testified to 20 years of experience with the Bank of America in Los Angeles, the Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, and as the Plaintiff in this case. He seemed to be familiar with the operations of the Federal Reserve System. The banker testified about the mortgage loan given to Mr. Jerome Daly, and then Mr. Jerome Daly cross examined the banker about the creating of money “out of thin air”. Mr. Jerome Daly asked the Bank President, “If you were just opening up your bank and no one had yet made a deposit, and I came into your bank and wanted to take out a loan of $18,000.00, could you loan me that money?” When the Bank President said, “Yes”, Mr. Jerome Daly then asked, “Does this mean that you can create money out of thin air?” And the Bank President said, “Yes, we can create money out of thin air.” He freely admitted that his Bank created all of the Money or Credit upon its books with which it acquired the Note and Mortgage of May 8, 1964. The credit first came into existence when the Bank created it upon its books by ledger entry. Further, he freely admitted that no United States Law gave the bank the authority to do this. There was obviously no lawful consideration for the Note. The Bank parted with absolutely nothing except paper and a bit of ink. Justice Martin V. Mahoney then said, “IT SOUNDS LIKE FRAUD TO ME” and everybody in the court room nodded their heads indicating that they agreed with Justice Martin V. Mahoney. No complaint was made by the banker that the bank did not receive a fair trial. From the admissions made by Mr. Lawrence V. Morgan, the path of duty was clearly made and very direct and clear for the jury. Their verdict could not reasonably have been otherwise. Justice was rendered completely, and without denial, promptly, and without delay, freely, and without purchase, comfortable to the laws in this Court on December 7, 1968. This was the first time the question has been passed upon in the United States. This decision is one of the great documents of American history. It is a huge cornerstone wrenched from the temple of Imperialism — one of the solid foundation stones of Liberty. The “Credit River Decision”, as it is known, was and still is the most important legal decision ever decided by a Trial Jury of 12 women and men! “All Rights Reserved /s/____David Everett Robinson_____ David Everett Robinson, Affiant, Authorized Representative, Attorney-In-Fact in behalf of DAVID EVERETT ROBINSON, Ens legis 3 Linnell Circle, Brunswick, Maine 04011 [email protected] Subscribed To And Sworn To Before God [Titus 1:2] this 17th day of December 2014. Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment THE BIGGEST COVER-UP IN DOJ HISTORY IS NOW BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT!! Posted on December 31, 2014 by David Robinson Tuesday: Tony Davis ~ HOW TO USE TITLE 18 TO OBTAIN RELIEF FROM A FEDERAL CRIMINAL CHARGE BY CHALLENGING YOUR INDICTMENT !!! A few months ago Tony Davis discovered the largest cover-up in Department of Justice (DOJ) history. The cover-up is responsible for thousands of people being illegally imprisoned and for the illegal prosecution of thousands more. This case is now in the Supreme Court and you have a very limited time to join the Petition. On July 27, 2009, Harley G. Lappin issued an Internal Memorandum to staff from his email address, [email protected], stating that because of the large amount of requests for administrative relief related to Title 18 (Public Law 80-772), the federal Criminal Code, that he had commenced an investigation by the Office of Special Counsel (DOJ), the clerk of the House of Representatives, and the National Archives to determine if Title 18 was unconstitutional. The investigation determined that indeed, Title 18 was [is] unconstitutional. Title 18 includes 18 U.S.C. §3231, which is the only statute allowing prosecution of any federal crime, including Title 21 and Title 26. Based on the investigation, Lappin went on to state that the House of Representatives had violated the Quorum Clause of the Constitution when the House voted 38 to 6 for passage when a quorum required 218 votes. The quorum issue is governed by Article I, Section 5, Clause 1, of the Constitution and the only Supreme Court case to rule on the Quorum Issue, United States v. Balin, Joseph & Co., 144 U.S. 1, 3 (1892). On December 8, 2010, under pressure from the DOJ, Lappin issued a Declaration under the penalty of perjury in federal court in New York claiming he never issued the Memorandum. Lappin was then forced to resign. Within the last few months the evidence has been uncovered that the DOJ engaged in a massive cover-up to conceal their investigation so people could not use it to have their case dismissed pretrial or to be removed from prison based on a claim of actual innocence after trial. The cover-up began in 2008 when the DOJ investigation started. The cover-up violates numerous criminal statutes as well as Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and the Clean Hands Doctrine. In the last few months, we have had witnesses come forward and prepare affidavits stating they had received a copy of the Lappin Memorandum from the Warden in their prison. We now have 2 affidavits and have identified 1,800 people in one prison that attended a town hall meeting where the warden passed out a copy of the Memorandum. We are looking for other witnesses. The petition has passed the lower courts and the Supreme Court accepted it as Docket No. 14-527 on November 7, 2014. The government waived argument on November 21, 2014. The court sent it to the judges on December 3, 2014 for review on January 9, 2014. In the petition, two questions are presented to the Supreme Court: QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Can a lower district or appellate court overrule Article I, Section 5, Clause 1 (the quorum clause) of the Constitution and the only Supreme Court ruling on the quorum clause, United States v. Balin, Joseph & Co., 144 U.S 1, 3 (1892) (in order for any bill to be valid the Journals of both Houses must show it was passed in the presence of a Quorum)? 2. Can a federal district or appellate court participate in and conceal a DOJ cover-up where the Director of the BOP issues a Memorandum on July 27, 2009 after review by the Office of the Special Counsel, the Clerk of the House, and the National Archives declaring that Public Law 80-772 is unconstitutional, in violation of the Quorum Clause of the Constitution? We are currently allowing people to join the petition prior to the court’s review. The objective, whether pre-trial, during trial, or post-trial is a Ruling of Actual Innocence. Once you receive an Actual Innocence Ruling, you should have the right to claim damages. With Best Regards, Yours in Freedom, Michael Edward 800-625-4250 > p.s. While I have your attention, please look at GrassfireCommunications – it’s the Game Changer for all of us. > Michael Edward here from AmericansRestoringAmerica. ARA has over 25,000 in membership and 30 some websites under it’s umbrella. One of the web sites under it’s umbrella is YourRemedyIsInTheLaw, which has over 9,000 in membership, 30 Information Providers to teach the YRIITL membership and has been on the internet since 2005. One of YRIITL’s Information Providers, Mr. Tony Davis, presently has one of his Students before The United States Supreme Court. The outcome of this litigation could positively affect millions of Americans who are presently serving time or have served time in the past in federal prison. One of the most important petitions in history is scheduled to be heard by the chief justices of the Supreme Court of the United States on January 9, 2014. It is imperative that the justices understand the significance of the petition to insure that they will hear the petition. The docket number is 14-527, David Moleski v. United States. The case has been docketed and the government has already waived argument. The judges are scheduled to hear it on January 9, 2015. We are requesting that you immediately write a letter supporting that the Court hear the petition. A cover sheet sample about the SCOTUS letter to forward to your Address Book is found here. A sample letter to SCOTUS to go with the cover sheet sample is found here. A sample of The Flyer to share with others who may want to benefit from this litigation is found here. The Flyer is commercial and you may or may not want to publish it. What The Flyer offers is the ability to join this petition before SCOTUS. The cost to join this litigation is $5,000.00. The cost to send a letter to The Supreme Court of the United States is your time, paper, envelope and a stamp. On one hand you wouldn’t want to publish the flyer as you are not being paid to publish it. On the other hand you would want to publish the flyer because those who are joined to the action will reap the benefit of Mr. Davis’ ten plus years in this effort and I’m confident you would want to share that opportunity just as you would point a thirsty man to where he may drink water. Your call . . . . Regardless of your joining this litigation, please send your letter to SCOTUS, attached. Related Articles: Top 2 Ponzi Schemes – Federal Reserve Coup & IRS Fraud Foreclosure Fraud – Banks Offer No Consideration – 1969 Wins Mexico Tunnels – Kuwaiti Professor Teaches Attacks Against America through Mexico Barney Frank – Mouse in the Whitehouse Top 5 Lies from DC – Federal Rules for IMF Livestock Martial Law – Since the 1930’s in America Tags: administrative relief, challenge your indictment, challenging your indictment, Clean Hands Doctrine, Harley g Lappin, title 18, title 18 relief, tony davis
Posted on: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:14:11 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015