I am extremely disappointed in the Supreme Court’s decision to - TopicsExpress



          

I am extremely disappointed in the Supreme Court’s decision to not hear appeals from five states on the right to define marriage within a state’s borders. There is nothing in our Constitution that prohibits a state from retaining the time-honored definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman. By refusing to take up these appeals, the Supreme Court has allowed unelected activist judges from lower federal courts to usurp the democratic process and undermine the constitutional rights of several states, including Colorado, to define marriage consistent with the values of their citizens. The definition of marriage should not be left to unelected and unaccountable judges, but rather by the people of each state. This is why I am a cosponsor of the State Marriage Defense Act, a bill that respects the definition of marriage held by the people of each state and protects states from the federal government’s efforts to force any other definition upon them. I will continue to work hard to see this important legislation passed into law.
Posted on: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 20:28:24 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015