I was a bit annoyed at the arrogant and naive video game console owners (likely teenagers/children who boast) who expect Next Gen on ENERGY EFFICIENT GAMING CONSOLES *sorry for capslock (bringing point accross)* while also claiming their machines are superior then PCs when clearly both are disadvantaged... Despite the low hardware on consoles. yes it may not be top notch like personal computers may have today, but remember that in the end the gaming consoles are meant to be Power Efficient and Graphically Good. They have balanced both, whereas Personal Computers require more power watt usage to gain more performance speed and is less energy efficient. When people purchase a console for an expectancy of PC Graphical Power, They are gravely mistaken. After all PCs has the ability of having lower game prices at the cost of Digital Rights Management whereas Consoles do not and require the developers to compensate for their losses through uping the price of the intial product, thus why its justified and the optimisation.. PC do have the upper-hand of 60 FPS. after all.. in my opinion. 30 FPS is not a must, ASLONG as it is not requiring twitch based reflexes such as COD, BF, and shooters in general, in this case it would require 60FPS. People seem to forget that to allow 60FPS on Consoles it would require the compensation of lowering the graphics to ensure the ability to reach 60FPS, thus why The Last Of Us remastered does not appear much different, but at the cost of a much favoured smooth 60FPS, that allows instant reaction, unlike 30FPS, that could take half a sec/milli sec. Im the essentially the silent minority in the video game console owner, after all its likely teenagers who believe their opinion is automatically damn superior, without any damn evividence christ...(x---x PS3) ~ HYPERTiZ/xHYPERTiZx
Posted on: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 06:40:03 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015