Its pretty difficult to find an article about Obamacare that isnt incredibly biased and making wild conclusions without a foundation. Both sides. Liberal and conservative. In the last twenty minutes, Ive read these lines (keep in mind these are from reputable new sources): premiums probably wouldve increased by 10% anyways probably? no citation. recently weve come to see that premium increases arent as bad as originally thought no citation. Obamacare isnt working. The Presidents approval rating is 41% and the approval rating of Obamacare is 37% no citation, and whats worse, much worse, is popular opinion doesnt necessarily mean anything. The author gave no other statistics. None. A proper opening sentence would be, Popular opinion seems to suggest that Obamacare isnt working. An author called his opposition: delusional, scary, lacking intellect, and drew a final conclusion without having made any points based on statistical fact. Sensationalism and reciprocity are relied on too heavily in the news these days. Start with facts. Then write your interpretation of the facts.
Posted on: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 01:44:07 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015