Justice For Madeleine The McCanns will not escape justice via the Mainstream Media. What child abduction? The position offered by the McCanns, initially, was break-in + disappearance = abductor. Eventually, Clarence Mitchell confessed that there was no evidence of a break-in. Clarrie’s retreat is very significant, it is as big as removing one of the elements of Earth, Wind and Fire. Suddenly, he was then claiming disappearance = abduction. But, all those references in the media remain where family and friends put out the McCanns propaganda of the fake break-in. Why did the McCanns fake a break-in? Almost as important, why have their friends and family still stuck by them when they have been used so badly, let down, and very seriously lied to? Why have they not been speaking to the media about questioning the McCanns why they were lied to? They were quite happy to gob off before when spinning the McCanns web of deceit. Kate McCann killed Madeleine Kate McCann killed Madeleine on the evening of 3 May 2007 whilst Gerry McCann was out of Apartment 5A playing tennis. She phoned Gerry McCann to inform him she needed him to come back to the apartment, however, she did not clarify her reason for needing his help. Rather than immediately return to the apartment to see what his wife wanted him for, instead Gerry McCann asked David Payne to look in on Kate McCann to check if she was alright. When David Payne arrived at Apartment 5A, for obvious reason Kate McCann would not let him in but informed him it was Gerry McCann whom she wanted. David Payne returned to the tennis court and informed Gerry McCann that Kate McCann did not want outside help from him but instead needed Gerry McCann to return to the apartment. The McCanns had agreed that Kate would bath the children whilst Gerry went off to play tennis, and then they would take the children to the playground area. Whilst Gerry was still under the impression that the children to the playground area was part of the plan for the evening, this had to change because of the death of Madeleine and the McCanns made the excuse that the children were tired to explain the change of plan. It was the start of the cover up. The case against the McCanns is compelling I will write this slowly for those who have difficulty grasping the facts. 1. Madeleine is missing. 2. Kate and Gerry McCann offer their explanation for Madeleine’s disappearance, an abductor must be responsible. They point to what they claim is a break-in to support their proposition. 3. The McCanns were in no position to advance an explanation. They were out of sight and sound of the apartment, eating and drinking with their friends at the Tapas bar. They had left, at least, the 2 year old twins Home Alone. They claimed all 3 children were asleep in the apartment when they went out for the evening. They claimed that they thought it was safe to leave 3 children under 4 years of age Home Alone. 4. There was no break-in. The McCanns change their story, they admit to leaving the apartment unlocked. Why did they claim that there had been a break-in? It has to be a cover story to conceal an event. Madeleine’s disappearance. The last people to see Madeleine alive were Kate and Gerry McCann. They claim to have answered all questions. This is a lie. They claim to have fully co-operated with the police. This is a lie. Their claim that they thought it was safe is a lie. 5. Justice for Madeleine requires a fair hearing, let us hear the truth, the whole truth, and nothing less than the truth. 6. The case against the McCanns is compelling. McCanns to blame for fake sightings “Maddie McCann wasseen for the lasttime by someone not of her familyat17.00 on that day“. This was thelastconfirmed sighting ofMadeleine alive. The first two fake sightings following this genuine sighting are by Kate and Gerry McCann: “Kate said that she had left the girl covered. Gerry, the father, maintains that the girl was sleeping on top ofthe blankets clutching her favourite soft toy“. “Do you believe press and media coverage of ‘Maddie sightings’ has got out of hand?”. And, in response to the following question: “Yes, the media are insulting Madeleine’s name and memory with constant ridicolous ‘sightings’ (I believe she is dead) Reconstruction ‘casts doubt on Madeleine McCann kidnapping’ A significant study into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has indicated that kidnapping would be inconsistent with the evidence. Paulo Sargento, a criminal psychologist at Lusófona University in Libson, has produced a 3D reconstruction of events at the Ocean Club on the evening Madeleine disappeared. He used minute-by-minute breakdowns of events published in The Times, the respected Portuguese newspapers Público and Sol and the BBC to test all hypotheses put forward by the Portuguese authorities. Dr Sargento cross-checked times and events from the moment that Kate and Gerry McCann went to pick up their children from the resort’s kindergarten at 4pm, until 10pm, when Mrs McCann reported that Madeleine was missing from their apartment. He found that from the moment when the McCanns arrived at the tapas restaurant at 8pm, seven people in their party got up a total of 14 times in two hours. Dr Sargento told SIC television: “There were people passing almost every five minutes. The question is how, in that time, could it be possible with so many people coming and going that no one saw someone coming in through the window without being seen? We have concluded this theory is very inconsistent.” It is understood that the recreation will be made available to the Polícia Judiciária to assist them in creating a definitive timeline of events on the Ocean Club.
Posted on: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 13:07:34 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015