LUKE WAS NOT AN EYE WITTINESS TO WHAT HE WROTE IN HIS GOSPEL! "Luke” is the only one of the four Gospel writers who was brave enough to admit from the start, that his account of the story of Jesus was indeed a hearsay account & that he was not an eyewitness to his account to the adventures of Jesus. In no uncertain terms Luke admits that his version of the events was taken from older sources. I would like to mention here that Luke is also not listed to be among Jesus’ 12 disciples. "Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us, LK 1:1 Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word; LK 1:2 good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from It seemed the very first, to write unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus, LK 1:3. That thou mightest know the certainty of those things, wherein thou hast been instructed. LK 1:4 THERE was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth. LK 1:5. {1} Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word (v:1) Translation “The true disciples delivered the scriptures to us they were the only eyewitnesses. {2}Even as they delivered them (Gospels) unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word (v:2-3)” It seems good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from It seemed the very first, to write unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus, Translation, “it seemed good to me also to accept the hearsay account and relate it to you Theophilus.” Theophilus, was the bishop of Antioch from 169-177 A.D. This should be all the evidence that you the reader need to be convinced unequivocally that the book of Luke was written more than a century after the death of Jesus, and that Luke did not know Jesus. The same person wrote both the book of Luke and the book of Acts. They are in reality personal letters written to Theophilus; both books begin with prologues & dedication to him. The prologue in Acts has a brief but fitting description of the content of what the writer called “the former treaties.” This was surely a reference to the Gospel of Luke. See Acts 1:1-3 below. The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach, ACTS 1:1 Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen: ACTS 1:2 To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God: ACTS 1:3 Also please read what the author wrote in Luke 3:2 Annas and Caiaphas being the high priests, the word of God came unto John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness. LK 3:2 Did this forger not know that there never was but one high priest at a time, just as there is but one President or one Pope at a time? AKHENATEN:> The Ghetto Messiah
Posted on: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:36:34 +0000