Let me tell you, hopefully, a helpful analogy in the form of a short story, that should shed some light on how and why this game is played by those very smart people who love money/power/control… Say you’re a young child of the age…say 7, and you and your father know the store owner/clerk down at the corner convenience store. And one day your father decides, for one reason or another, to send you in his place, down to that store for some milk and bread. Not yet trusting you with cash, he sends you with a note in the form of an IOU instead: …Jim [owner/clerk] would you please accept this IUO for 1/2 gal. of milk, and 2 loaves of wonder bread. I’ll pay the balance owed, for these items, when I see you, Thanks. Signed: Your father. OK, you make it down to the store and the owner/clerk trusting your fathers’ note (IOU); gives you the requested items in exchange for said note, and sends you home with the goods in hand. Now, during the period of time when you leave the store with said goods, and arriving home handing your father the milk and bread; a legal question arises as to who actually owns the milk and bread during the time of your trip back home? Does the store owner/clerk still own the milk and bread, because he hasn’t been paid yet? Is it you who has the goods in your possession? You know what they say: possession is nine tenths of the law …Right? Or, do the goods belong to your father who issued the IUO that the store owner/clerk accepted in exchange for said goods? The answer to this legal question is the fundamental reason behind the STATES’ legal and lawful standing, when it comes to the STATE being able to confiscate a percentage of your wages as a tax, and/or confiscating, your falsely perceived, property, when you fail to do as you’re told, by said STATE. And… The answer to the riddle is… your father owns the milk and bread. And under the UCC, that’s even if the owner/clerk never receives the money for said goods! That’s because he relinquished ownership of the milk and bread the moment he accepted that note (IOU) in exchange fore said goods. Granted, the owner/clerk could sue for breach of contract (IOU), but he no longer owns the milk or bread. As for you owning the goods? …Fat chance; you were simply your fathers’ agent. Are you beginning to get the picture yet? Wesley Snipes, nor you, own any property (the Holy Grail of LAW). You can’t, unless you paid your debts at Law with gold and/or silver coin; instead of discharging your debts in equity. “No State shall…coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debt.” has NOT been repealed, and, contrary to popular believe, is still in full force and effect, and being complied with today. It doesn’t say anything about YOU contracting with a private corporation (the Federal Reserve–NOT Federal), and using their commercial paper (IOUs) for your medium of exchange …Does it? NO! All contract law, done in accordance with the law, rules…period. And that contract/agreement between two or more parties, of sound mind, doesn’t simply dissolve just because one of the parties involved decides that they don’t want to play anymore. I’m not saying there aren’t legit reasons, or ways of dissolving said contracts/partnerships–there are. And as far as the income-tax/SSN is concerned, no one is coerced into that contract. Did somebody hold a gun to Wesley Snipes head, and say: sign here, and use these (FRNs)–or else? …NO. Conned and coerced are not the same thing. If you were conned, you were conned by way of your own ignorance. As the maxim states: “Ignorantia juris non excusat”. By definition: a lawful binding contract between two or more parties IS the Law. Don’t remember how many times I heard or read about musicians and bands that have been raped (I say that figuratively Kabot), robbed and pillaged from various record companies due to their signature on a document (contract). And being absolutely powerless to do anything about it, until after the terms and conditions of said contract has expired. I really don’t have any other term to use, other than slavery that most people can readily associate with that comes closest to describing what is happening here…which is a form of slavery. -Random Dude named Mark
Posted on: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:46:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015