Lets forget for a moment that this mess in the Middle East was created by the UK empire by meddling where it had no moral business to meddle. Now, we hear grand standing statements (from another empire) like [The Press spokesman of the White House, Josh] Ernest admitted that the concept of division [of Iraq] is not clear and is a new concept, but he acknowledged the seriousness of imposing third-party solutions on the Iraqi people. Correct me if Im wrong, but wasnt the US that sent troops (meddled) into Iraq trying to bring third-party solutions on the Iraqi people? Isnt the US that is trying to force Maliki out? OK, that was in the past. But what about Palestine today? Israel is desperately trying to annex Palestine bit by bit supported by many pro-Palestinian activists who would want to see a one-state solution. How long do we have to wait before we start talking about a division of that one-state (still un-named, but likely to still be Israel)? Are we learning anything from history?
Posted on: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:09:32 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015