Mr Vladimir Putin The President of Russia 06/01/2015 Dear Honorable President, I have just pasted my formal complaint to the University of Westminster in this f/b account, which I actually lodged to the university on 09 Dec 2013. After that, I wrote to the Vice Chancellor of the University too and contacted the relevant figures in the administration. But no satisfactory result that I found from them. A good number of tutors, staff members in LPC and other parts of the University simply played with me a lot so far. And, because of all dirty roles taken by the Westminster University as well as their all dangerous involvements in my MICRO CHIP brain and outrageous torture case with outsiders and two major political parties of Britain, my MICRO CHIP torture case since July 2012 continued towards a very possible third world war in the most silent tragic. I do believe that you will be able to write a historical book for me by your close people on my world lead milestone and the most expensive case. I, therefore, do hope that you will collect and read all of my posts and information during your leisure periods. This is because my case must be a very exceptional one in this techno competitive human world and/or even, in your Political and Military career. I do also believe that you will never get one like mine in your next breathing life. Thanks very much in anyway, Sincerely yours, Rezaul Huda London ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Head of Student Services University of Westminster 101 New Cavendish Street London W1W 6XH 9 December 2013 Regarding: Formal complaints Dear Sir/Madam, 1 The autumn term of LPC (Legal Practice Course) actually began on 3rd Sept 2012 and I was unreasonably restricted attending classes from the next 2 days after the start to around one month. I was allowed continuing classes after the concern committee received a set of my documentations in my presence. But I got shocked and astonished with the tricky decision made by the program leader just 2 days later when I was told about my visa problem in my second day classes. Such casual decision on me to discontinue classes was based on a lame cause and I could do nothing legally or morally against such unexpected decision. The programme leader was present likely the head of the checking group while a set of required documentations was received from me to continue classes. On my first 2 days, I found suspicious girls who sat beside me during the long combined class. I electronically informed it my local MP Mr Stephen Timms on the same day following my invisible outstanding problem. I suspected the girls who were shaking the tables underneath and pressing their writing copies on the table unexpectedly during the whole hours of the classes. And, I have never seen them in next classes of the course when I resumed 1 month later. I do strongly believe that they were allowed attending classes despite they were neither registered for LPC studies nor the university students. This is how the programme leader and the director of studies acted unlawfully in terms of my case by breaching of the regulations. 2. After 1 month, I found at least one elderly unregistered student with us in our group-A. He used to follow me when I would pop in toilet or wash room at the floor during small breaks. I would always suspect this black man who seemed to be around 55 years. He would be absent in most classes with us while we all were the full time students. I, therefore, tried to be nearer to him for having ideas about his secret intention and information about my existing problem. One day, he shared me his information who came from the USA to continue some modules inclusive BLP of the course. I would simply follow his name and signature on the register due to my suspicious curiosity whether he was registered with us or not. I havent always found his name on every attendance sheet of the registers whereas he put his signature only on few of them. His name was also written in the last on the register page with a big gap which was suspicious adequate. Finally,I found him to be disappeared one day as I have not seen him anymore. It is reportable that he would sometimes be absent during some BLP classes taken by the director of studies. I very carefully observed that the man was clearly feeling nervous while the director of studies was in BLP classes. I, therefore, considered him an undercover agent who might have been working closely with the British or any global authority. I do hope that a careful investigation on this specific issue should reveal all relevant interesting secrets for the betterment of the reality in terms of my gigantic case. 3. I would like to give you my concern with worries about the unnecessary fire alarms made by the university for many times. I do reasonably believe that there was definitely an invisible competition between two groups as otherwise students would not be distracted by the fire alarms while they were obviously concentrated to the tutors lectures into the class rooms. The alarms would not be stopped until all the students would go outside the building or sometimes at the stairs. The scenarios were really awful to me when I would presume the usage of central cameras made by the authority. I do strongly believe that this happened due to my presence in the university. The same terrible alarms were made during my last exam in LLB on 12 August 2012 at Goldsmith College in London under Northumbria University. 4 A good number of fellow mates irrespective of groups of the course were artfully used against me by my group tutor (Mr David Stewart), the director of studies (Mr Martin Skirrow) and the program leader (Mr Miles Macleod). I got confused sometimes observing a division among them with the silent competition but did not obviously hold any crystal evidence on this issue to share one. Students from different groups would unnecessary look at me during the long lecture which was massive at the last stage of the course. I would then be feeling shy for it contemplating LPC mates included staff members at the whole campus were misguided by an active group about my mysterious problem. I, therefore, was quite separated from others at most times but would effort my best performance by working with 1 or 2 mates in the group. I do reasonably believe that Mr David Stewart was the premier misguide in terms of engaging my fellows against me. He might have misguided my group mates first by sharing false information against me which seemed to be detrimental for me.1 or 2 students on the stairs would indirectly comment me disable where white students in my group first artfully started leaving me. I suppose that most tutors and fellows in the long combined lectures would eye me deeming a drug addicted one though I do not blame tutors directly for that. Most fellows at the last stage of the academic year would not comment about me anything strongly but their continuous look at my face would make me feeling shy. I observed carefully about some fellows who would love spending time in the class hours after hours just beside me but would look at my face with a very deep concentration after he or she was misguided with such wrong information against me. I, then, would realize my shocking next situation with a fellow who was nice to me just an hour before. I think some of my closed fellows who passed at least an hour were technically misguided to depart from me. 5. I met in person for many times to my program leader (Mr Miles Macleod) and the course director (Mr Martin Skirrow) in order to give my past background symptoms. I added them what I had been facing randomly at home, class room and outside at shops, buses, trains, tubes, stations, restaurants, hair saloon, super markets or wherever. I even spoke to them over phone for many times who always denied commenting they knew no official information in my case. On 28 November 2012, the program leader replied my email on my query stating that the LPC department was not aware of any official case that I had to report to the University for Help on the same day. Rather, my group tutor (Mr David Stewart) technically harassed me in different how particularly in front of fellows highlighting like a quick bathroom flush, credit cards on different names, class one drug (heroine), plastic bag, cash money etcetera while I was continuing his lectures. I understand these were a part of the lecture but his roles were completely different and suspicious. He would sit on the class room table with his shoes during his group lecture to us which he practiced at least 1 or 2 times suspiciously. He lectured unnecessarily in the long combined class at room 3.07 about the brain hack laws and its output into the court in terms of victims attentions to the lectures. He commented roughly shouting Free! Free! during a practice class on Solicitors Accounts following its imminent exam. Ms Dora was present in the room with him. And, I noticed her telling him something very slowly. I do strongly believe that his behaviour was further suspicious where I was likely his complete eyesore. The director of studies was not different from the personal tutor. He would simply place his legs with shoes on the high table in his room as soon as I would go to his room for different reasons. To confirm this suspicious behaviour, I would follow other fellows after they popped in. I do report you with my regrets that he used to apply it in terms of my entry. 6. I found white plain powder likely a class one drug (heroine) on a table in the class room where I would sit with my group mates. I had to clear it from the table with a silent anger and none could understand its reason except me. I suppose that a group of undercover agents or such people from the upper floor of our LPC class rooms would monitor every of my steps and each of my words uttered in the class room with fellows. They would apply the same irrespective of the toilet, corridor, canteen and the main entry of the campus building. I realized harsh tortures into my brain at the most sordid moments during the continuation of classes and it was indeed hard to concentrate to the tutors lectures. I would feel harsh and rough feelings during the classes which might have applied by the hackers to evaluate my attentions or hearing capacities. And, my indifferent feelings from underneath of my bed and pillow irrespective of day or night would be during my sleep or rest. I vigilantly noticed that the brain hackers would likely try listening to my thoughts. Such rough and harsh tortures into my brain were repeatedly examined by my GP who found my both ears swollen and infectious. The GP prescribed me ear drop (Gentisone) to use for 4 times a day. My landlord had to call ambulance for emergency treatment during my severe pain on my neck and shoulder. I still feel one of my left hand fingers paralyzed. The doctors made X-ray and MRI on most parts of my body who found a significant impingement in my cervical spine. The doctors’ conclusion in the report was Large disc extrusion causing potential left: C7 nerve root impingement. The hackers could have surprisingly been able to turn my brain into all dirty scenes which made mostly via false dreams during my sleep in major. I named this “forced dreams. I was afraid of my unlucky situation by such hackers deeming God created each human with a brain to be well thoughtful or considered before each action. But hackers on their so called duty were using their technological power to ban my thoughts and considerations over my daily lessons or issues ahead or behind. I silently used to laugh at the scenes when I thought them to be in nightmare for their win in terms of an invisible competition. Their dream would only be feasible if I would be preyed to their tricky traps. 7. During my LPC classes between September 2012 and December 2012, I had to travel from maryland street station to stratford station by train and from stratford station to oxford circus station by tube. In stratford station, I noticed stations electronic timetable board for trains arrival or departure was out of order. A member of staff on duty honestly replied my query that they were facing a big trouble there which was not an easy one to be resolved quickly. He added me that the line was cut off by the local authority which was based on a serious political disputes between two parties. 8. On December 21 2012, police came to my previous property at Maryland Street with a warrant copy under section 135(1) of the mental health Act 1983 to go to the mental health hospital with them. As soon as I reached there, I was told then to be admitted in the hospital under section 2 of the same Act which I found as betrayal. I felt then overall helpless due to failures on my calls to get connected both Mr Stephen Timms MP and Ms Lyn Brown MPs office. I left my voice message at both offices for their urgent help. The reason behind the warrant was my emails to MPs where Mr James on behalf of Mr Stephen MP complained CMHT sharing quotes from my sent emails to them. I, therefore, started suspecting Mr Stephens letter to me on 30 July 2012, his overall roles during my crisis hours, emails from his office in Sept 2012 and my presence at Stratford picture house to attend a seminar organized by Newham Councils Mayor and others. But Mr Stephen MP was absent during my visits at his office and Stratford picture house respectively. I was merely shocked due to his absence in my both appointments because I was earlier confirmed about his presence. I felt none of his office staff was brilliant in terms of identifying ones actual problem. I, therefore, carried an unhappy mind despite I spoke to a member staff in his office. I informed all of my outrageous problems to the staff member during my visit in Oct 2012. I am confused now whether he was Mr James or not. If he were Mr James, he might get punished then due to his inexpertness or immaturity or negativity to me. Mr Stephen cant give up his liability in anyway because he simply relied on inexpert staff members, and did not try to listen to me. 9. My ECG test was captured just before me by Dr Pirabalini Kulendran (GPST1 in psychiatry, SHO to Dr Kittler) and another Indian origin female doctor with her on 21 December 2013 within 1 hour of my admission under section 2 of the Act. Dr Pirabalini thanked me replying my query that my ECG result was normal. I also noticed my ECG image was being printed by Dr Pirabalini for sending at somewhere. I was then given a medical pot asking to collect my urine. I happily provided the urine sample to the nurse named Ms Peace. But I had not seen where they tested it as she forwarded it to the laboratory. I initially refused taking medication following my admission under section 2. I had to pass 2 nights like this for the consultants decision about me. But I was bound later to be reluctant for taking medication when my situation was unstable there. I was threatened by the staff members to push injection on my bum. I was, therefore, likely forced to swallow Haloperidol (2mg mane, 3mg nocte) and clonazepam 0.5mg by stating that these had no side effects, and these were to take by everyone whoever came at the ward during the health assessment period. I do understand that Mr Stephen office and his selected doctors at the ward were in dilemma after they found nothing in my both tests. They took at least 2 days finding an alternative solution in terms of my case. In a ward round, I asked the consultant what problem she found in me. She replied, it may be -----, may be------ or may be bla bla bla.You are still in under assessment to diagnose the symptom due to sending your emails to Mr Stephen Timms MP who reported CMHT and our member of staff found tapes under the ceiling at your room where you emailed Mr Timms saying secret cameras. I told her then that the contents of my emails were absolutely true and I was sharing him my emails since 2010. I shared him more than100 exclusive emails between September 2011 and May 2012 in relation to my outstanding problems with the private college directors in E1. He did not inform then to CMHT but his office now wrote CMHT about my suspicious emails. Isn’t it crying need to look at all past emails? 10. I was, however, getting reactant soon after I swallowed haloperidol. It was likely my feet were going to be stable or I could not walk fast like yesterday. But nurses on duty were unable to give any decision other than a meeting held at a weekly ward round and I had to swallow such medications in front of them considering to get released soon. As I was seriously trying to find a way out from this false detention because of an unexpected political scenario, I was politely asking nurses about any easy way to get myself out from such a conspiracy. Most nurses replied me to take medications on a regular basis who just updates their every note in relation to a patient. Finding no alternative, I then started following their instruction in order to get released within 28 days under section 2 of the 1983 Act as this was a mini prison too. 11. Just before Christmas presumably on 24 December 2012, I was given a list of NHS Solicitor firms to represent my appeal case in the tribunal hearing if I wish to get discharged from the imposed section-2 of the Act. I called 2 Solicitors on that day but finally confirmed Mr Nick Heslop from Norman H. Barnett & Co. He met me at Sapphire ward after X-mas on 27 Dec 2012. He received my instruction to be represented at the tribunal hearing. On January 3 2013, the tribunal held in the hospitals conference room by Mr H Gott (Judge), Dr A Smith (Tribunal medical member) and M Libby (Tribunal member/Lay person). I sat before the tribunal beside my Solicitor Mr N Heslop. Mr Abdul Goni from Bandar Bazar Cash & Carry, London E1 2PH was also present there who gave his oral witness statement on my behalf. The tribunal considered oral evidences from Dr Ahmed, Ms Okojie, Mr Chombo and written evidences from Dr Z Kittler (whom I never found before this hearing), Ms Okojie, D Masuku (Nurse) respectively. 12. The tribunal lasted for more than 2 hours and it was almost difficult for me to concentrate to their conversation smoothly due to the reaction from haloperidol. I had to swallow this haloperidol less than a couple of hours ago. I did not try revealing haloperidol problem further with anybody as they say it had no side effects. I, therefore, thought it would completely be negative in terms of my case as Dr Ahmed and others seem engaging to give me more troubles even in the ward. Besides, my expression of haloperidol problem could stop my discharge from section 2 by this tribunal hearing.So,I appreciated my strength to answer their questions despite I was slowly trembling because of haloperidol reaction. I was, however, not discharged from section 2 but allowed continuing my university classes within a treatment plan. The tribunals decision was based on my true answers to their questions. I confirmed the tribunal about the contents in my emails to MPs were to ask their help in terms of my unexpected case. The contents were exact what I felt on a regular basis. 13. I then resumed attending my classes and this was the only scope for me to get released during those crisis hours. I shared such nasty circumstances to my courses program leader and expected to obtain universitys help in this regard. But I found them in different moods that were dilly-dallying in terms of my continuous requests. Following my request, my civil mock script was taken to the tutor to mark it first so that it can be shared to CMHT. I was given a comment by the marker may pass or may fail on the script. My course director Mr Martin suggested me to go back my country following my future entry after Sept 2013. He ensured me that the university would exceptionally consider me paying the maximum portion back of my paid course fees. Mr Martin used Ms Anne Marie Reilly who called the tribunal witness Mr Abdul Goni at an evening. She requested him to convince me accepting their rare offer. During her conversation, she emphasized him the consequence of my existing problem was my unsuccessful results to date and my abundant emails to MPs included Mr Stephen Timms MP. Mr Goni, a renowned businessman in E1 was so close to me since 2006 who would periodically visit me at the ward during my stay in the hospital. That is why; I forwarded his number to Ms Anne Marrie during her query in my visits. Mr Goni was my only oral witness at the hearing who gave his evidence to the tribunal. It is to further report here that Mr Martin sent me very technically to Ms Anne Marrie for having her advice. By sending me to her, I felt finding Mr Martins dirty plan which was revealed to me. He seemed hiding all of their criminal activities which they applied on me detrimentally.But their all evil attempts were ruined because of my consciousness. 14. I found an unexpected problem caused by the courier company in terms of my X-mas gifts delivery. The program leader agreed with me verbally to use LPC resource room address for such gifts. It was after I asked him to receive my gifts for my tutors and my group fellows. I honestly shared him the receipt confirming the shipping on 8 December 2012 made by my elder brother on my behalf from his garment factory in Bangladesh. The program leader replied my email on 10 Dec 2012 in this regard. The delivery company made unrealistic delay for which it was impossible to deliver the X-mas gifts before the X-mas or the New Year. I spoke then to my brother about an unexpected problem who asked the courier to deliver the box in my friend’s address (Mr Goni, Bondor Bazar Cash & Carry, London E1 2PH). I actually received it from Mr Goni after the tribunal hearing held on 3rd January 2013. I then made further contact with the program leader about the X-mas gift box and reposted to the LPC resource room via a post office delivery. This is also to let you know that another X-mas box at the same time was posted to at least 15 Labour MPs in the House of Commons which was delivered before the X-mas. 15. The similar problem I faced after I informed the program leader about my probable visit to Bangladesh on my wedding purposes. I had to disclose my plan to him as I wanted a travel letter from him due to my visa following the planned visit to my elder brother and his family in Oman. My visa, however, was not issued by the Oman Embassy despite I made a lot of attempts at every angle on my application. In a reply behind my applications refusal, the authority informed my elder brother there about a restriction to issue my visa. I, therefore, got shocked with suspicion and stopped my plan moving out from London. I also wrote to UK Border Agency with the concern on my re-entry issue who wrote me in this respect. 16. I made my first application of mitigating circumstances claim on valid grounds which was supported by medical evidences. But my application was rejected by the concerned board without giving me any reason. I noticed it hung on the black board outside the LPC resource room without a refusal reason. I was advised by the program leader to re-submit fresh medical evidences when I asked him its refusal reason. I, however, re-submitted evidences soon but I was unfortunately not informed its last result yet. I was merely confirmed by the program leader that the concern member staffs on mitigating circumstances board was on holiday. And, he is liable who would produce my new evidences to the member as soon as he/she comes back from the holiday. A question then rose in me whether the program leader confirmed me about the board chairman or his nearer closed member at MC board. 17. According to section 11.51, I must get an email or response on my MC applications rejection. I, therefore, directly note a breach of the regulation as I neither received any confirmation email nor any letter or oral explanation. I also find a clear breach of section 11.52 of the regulation in terms of any additional or new evidences to meet a condition of my existing application. Following a ‘fit to sit’ policy under section 11 of the Academic Regulations, I submitted my further application on 27 August 2013 to defer my existing modules until I am fit to sit. I cant welcome myself to sit for exams while my disputes with the university are lively. I have still not been confirmed about the output of my last MC application despite I was emailed on 12 and 18 September 2013 by the program leader confirming that my claim would be reviewed by the MC board over the next few weeks. His reply on 24 June 2013 was also not clear to me why my MC claims were upheld by an independent MC board. I, therefore, decided to add here most of electronic communications. 18. I would like to be spontaneous that I was emailed a CAS (Confirmation of acceptance for studies) form by the program leader to fill it up on 13 June 2013. I officially submitted it to ‘Tier 4 compliance adviser (Mr James Herron)’ at 101 New Cavendish Street. I forwarded my submission to the program leader too for LPC office record. Please note all required copies in the bundle attached with this application. Both Mr Miles and Mr James verbally ensured me to issue a CAS following my visa extension during my several but separate meetings with them on this single occasion. Emails from Mr Miles on 11 September 2013, 22 August 2013, 20 August 2013 and 13 June 2013 respectively were advices for arranging appointments with Mr James on my CAS issue. He repeatedly confirmed in his emails that Mr Herron was responsible to issue my CAS following my visa extension. The program leader also confirmed me that he provided Mr James with all the required information what he requires issuing my CAS. 19. I would like to report you that I was not given the right advice by Ms Janet at 101 New Cavendish Street whom I found making calls to senior staff members on my issue. I wanted the local police station number to her in order to notify my foreseeable detriments following a continued conspiracy by the university staff members whereas I felt to be overstaying soon. She gave me the nearest police station number from the internet. I tried then calling on the number in front of her via my mobile. After that, I came out the Cavendish building carrying a false assurance made by Ms Janet. She actually received it from a senior member staff over phone. Ms Janets assurance was that they would be discussing my issue when Mr James Herron comes back in the next week. It is to be reported you that I found no reply so far from any of them on my above issue. 20. This is to be boldly noted with a number of concerns that Mr Herron was always tricky with me during many of my phone calls and meetings in person. He never tried to reply my crucial emails on 11 September 2013, 20 August 2013 and 9 August 2013 about my CAS issue. Such conducts have automatically raised questions with the concern about the university’s academic services. Such concern seriously follows the breach of the academic regulations. I have had the regular communications with closed fellows in my own group including other groups at LPC. A part of them was from our country. But it is regretted for a potential report that no CAS was issued in terms of my extension. All of my known fellows got their CAS to extend their visa. 21. At the eleventh hour of my visa expiry, Mr Miles and Mr James suddenly began advising to go back my country in order to come later as a student visitor. The program leader emailed me on 22 August 2013 confirming that I can sit for my outstanding LPC modules at a British Council in Bangladesh. And, they will contact a British Council to arrange such exams. I did consider such casual advice in a negative way as I was confirmed ago to issue the CAS while I hold my existing problem with them too. Both of them started advising me indifferently in terms of my CAS issue. I can remember my own disasters that I had been suffering from many other outstanding problems. The problems are chiefly with my debit card, credit card, fraud transactions on both debit and credit card accounts, problems with 2 mobile network companies, broadband service restrictions to access internet at home, my laptop and printer problem which were copied and hacked by the strangers at outside, unexpected disputes with the landlords wherever I moved in, problems with 2 GP surgeries under NHS, facing photo or video attack by a group of photo journalists closed my home which was before I was taken to the mental health hospital, unexpected train delay at Maryland station during my travel to the university, a lot of casual private staff at Maryland station, 50 or more undercover agents would follow me closely within my travel from home to the university, no response was from more than 200 emails to the prime ministers office in Bangladesh and her personal email, tortures on different sensitive parts of my body inclusive my brain and many more on daily basis. No help I found from the activists, supporters, leaders, friends of Bangladesh Awami League in UK despite I requested some of them to come forward with their helpful hands. 22. Largely, I have been suffering from terrible pain in my neck, left arm and fingers since January 2013. I had to swallow a good number of strong painkillers within a few hours apart from the GPs prescription. This is to add you that I completed my blood test, X-ray, MRI (neck, left shoulder and brain), Physiotherapy, neurology test and many more. As I got registered with a new GP surgery on 3 September 2013, I had to supply the nurse my urine sample for its test. My visa application on human rights grounds has been refused by the UKBA without giving me an appeal right. I try to get an appointment with a Solicitor firm due to my problem but I found someone in dark just have misguided them. I have had my existing GP appointments for which I still do not dare to go home. The expert told me that I might have the operation very soon due to cervical spine impingement and the doctors are involved now in more investigations. 23. My elder industrialist brother through his Europe business partner company paid the whole course fee for my LPC studies. And, I received a part of my accommodation costs for the last 2 years from my younger industrialist brother through his Hong Kong business partner company. I have the specific allegation on University’s staff members wherever I called then starting from switchboard to Cavendish finance. I simply tried to have a receipt of my fees paid. I had the existing Tier-4 application then in home office following my visa extension for which I needed to update them confirming my whole fees were paid by my brothers. But I received unbelievable misconducts from the most call receivers. I emailed the program leader on 11 October 2012 about such nasty tricks. I can ensure you that I received his reply on 12 October 2012 on the issue. I recorded some staffs’ unusual conversations into my mobile which was the last resort in terms of my evidence. I warned the staff members that I was recording their rude conversations with me. Some of them then got OK but most of them were not changed. I emailed the program leader and the director of studies simultaneously on 24 April 2013 in relation to 2 Bengali origin staff members at IT services who criticised me using a slang language in Oct 2012. 24. I made my calls on Westminster IT, not Northumbria IT. Accordingly, I put my immediate complaints to the duty managers at Westminster IT. I, therefore, have not believed the LPC program leaders statement that the 2 Bengali origin staff members were from Northumbria IT, not from the Westminster IT. This is one of the premier issues today with a good number of automatic concerns because the program leader seemed to be engaged him with all inauspicious activities. 25. I can ensure you that I called, emailed and wrote to Labour MPs in order to achieve their urgent advice during all ugly aspects in my case despite I found no reply from them. I had continuous contact with the local MP since 2010. Many more emails were shared or exchanged, and I wrote many letters to him too. Mr Stephens letter to me on 30 July 2012 quoting a probable criminal investigation carrying on against me was definitely a reply over my letter sent him on 23 July from the Westminster University campus. I actually called the program leader on that day visiting the universitys main campus in regard to my acceptance on LPC offer. I had a plan to go to a BPTC provider outside London in relation to my existing BPTC application while I was facing suspicious activities by the private college directors at East London. This is to let you know that I always preferred BPTC to LPC. I contacted BSB, all BPTC providers, the Inn and Northumbria University in April/May 2012 in relation to all probable false complaints at everywhere against me by a group at East London. Their target seemed to be detrimental which was to destroy my possible BPTC offer and LLB degree. I directly requested each body above to let me know if anything was put against me to them. I got direct response from most of them although a very few of them have not replied me instantly. This is also to let you know that I applied for LPC as the last resort of my situation. I applied for LPC after my situation with Northumbria University became fragile. It was the situation after Northumbria refused my BPTC application’s both modes due to my calls over phone about their irregularities. I had been encountering problem caused by the private college directors. I had to call police on 999 in 2011 during my year-II at Holbrook College and wrote in 2011 to Northumbria University, Bethnal Green police station, ASIC and UK Border Agency. Each of my communications must be well recorded with them as I still hold all next day delivery or recorded postal receipts. I also spoke to them for many times spending hours after hours. 26. Around 1 week before of my flight to Bangladesh on 23 Feb 2013, I received my BRP card from UKBA. During this time, I also attempted my criminal advocacy assessment and found its result as pass online while I was in Bangladesh. After returning on March 9 2013, I attended Litigation (Civil & Criminal)-1st attempt, Solicitors A/cs-1st attempt, Wills & Administrations: interviewing & questioning-2nd attempt (video recorded), Immigration: interviewing & questing: 1st attempt (video recorded). But I was given all false marks where there might have existed a secret history likely political. I can ensure you with any condition that I passed my both attempts of Wills & Administrations (Interviewing & Questioning) where first attempt was much better than its second attempt, and both assessments were videoed accordingly. During my first attempt of Wills & Administrations, I heard commenting by the first marker Ms Lucy Tagg to the program leader at the corridor that I performed very well. I can also ensure you that they were unreasonably curious to me then and a number of senior staff members misguided the most tutors. I report now with my regrets that I later found it fail in online as my result was altered very quickly. I, therefore, suspect the university following a massive conspiracy against me led by the senior staff members including the members mentioned above. 27. All of my efforts were failed collecting a DVD copy of Wills & Administrations assessment in order to find my actual errors. I would like to challenge my marks by a neutral investigation where 4 or 5 fellows scripts could be compared with my assessment scripts or records. I was similarly awarded a false mark in PLR (Practical Legal Research) too just before I was forced to go to the mental health hospital on 21 Dec 2012. I was provided my Criminal Advocacy mock DVD which was held on 10 Dec 2012. And, this recorded assessment will definitely prove today that I was wrongfully taken to the mental health hospital based on the conspiracy they spread. Mr Martin Skirrow and Ms Anne Marrie had the strong link to the third parties outside the university behind this conspiratorial scenario. I have included a copy of it for your own assessment whether I can obtain the pass mark (50%) or not. I was totally optimistic to secure the highest mark in immigration skills assessment which was recorded. This is because as I did my best there and the DVD record will definitely demonstrate it. The girl who was present in this assessment for questioning made comments in front of the marker and me. She commented as soon as I ended, Wow! He completed most of the questions. Her comments might have recorded as I noticed she pressed the remote’s button after she approached it on my extra-ordinary performance. I, therefore, strongly urge you to make official investigations over the issues raised above. 28. I astonished witnessing Mr Martin Skirrows direct involvement just before me during my second attempt of Wills & Administration (interviewing & questioning) assessment. I was simply silent when Martin greeted me 3 or 4 minutes ago in the wash room saying Hi Huda!’. I afterward found him entering into the assessment room just before me where the question maker from outside was also present. As soon as Mr Martin came out of the assessment room, I was called to get in by the marker (Ms Sarah) for the above assessment. I noticed the questioner with a suspicious attitude from the very beginning during her questions to me or when I asked her to produce her identity in terms of my advice. Her wrong attitude must be well recorded in the video, I hope. The girl was repeating questions with a hate attitude on her face to me in front of Ms Sarah. This is why; I was sometimes likely losing my balance in terms of my concentration to her questions. This is because I was simultaneously thinking about the possible misguidance by Mr Martin just before me. Alternatively, I aimed once to leave the assessment room by making an objection but I was steady with my patience. Why did Martin behave like this? The reason is that Martin might have been informed by the said uncover agents who copied my laptop as well as printer. They might have obviously got all of my drafting when I typed my own preparation sheet in MS Word at my laptop. They might also have got it during my printings by my printer at home. Such sheet by the undercover agents could have been shared with Mr Martin, and this was the most feasible one. 29. Furthermore; Martin, Miles, David and others at LPC might have been informed falsely by the brain hackers who listened to my thoughts or memories or plans or knowledge during such assessment. And, this is how Mr Martin could have dared applying his sordid policy using the girl or marker for giving me trouble. This is how I was awarded overall false marks. Mr Martin might have seemed to be passing his moments with tremendous pressure by the third parties in order to apply mistreatments on me. Such nasty activities deemed to be absolutely fraudulent. These are completely a breach of section 10 of the academic regulations. These must also not comply with the laws supported by the SRA. 30. The marker in terms of immigration interviewing and questioning assessment was an external marker who was a Bengali national. A potential question automatically arises now under the sections 7, 12, 13 and 14 of the academic regulations whether the first and second both marking procedures were complied with in terms of this assessment. I noticed laws at a glance in terms of external markers involvement as internal. And, a good number of further questions now arise whether such laws were genuinely followed by the authority or not. I also noticed laws available in terms of exam scripts for the above modules. Exam scripts could be given back even for ever to a vulnerable student for his/her best or error findings if needed. But these were directly ignored with threats despite my multiple appeals to the authority for many times. 31. I felt embarrassed indeed after I have not found myself in the pass list of the above stated assessments. That is why; I had no alternative hope other than my challenge on my recorded DVD assessments. I actually want the best route for detecting many unrevealed truths. I, therefore, rejected the reply on false mark issue over my initial complaints from the program leader and the director of studies on 24 and 25 June 2013 respectively. For my own judgment, I continued expecting all recorded DVD assessments inclusive MC issues through phone calls, in person, emails until 18 September 2013 as the latest. 32. I have the most durable complaint so far against my personal tutor Mr David Stewart. He ignored me for the whole academic year from the responsibility as his group student. I was simply running behind him with queries for many times but he has not cared. He teased me roughly with evil intentions in the class in front of fellows. I noticed in the laws that personal tutors are important for LPC students who comment referring his students in terms of training contracts for career purposes. I, therefore, emailed to the program leader on 23 and 25 June 2013 with my concerns on personal tutor issue. The program leader replied me on 24 June 2013 accepting my complaints on this specific issue. He also forwarded my email to the director of studies who responded me on 25 June 2013 offering Ms Dora Christodoulous consent to act as my new personal tutor. But Ms Dora was not in my option for my new personal tutor as she was controversial with others in many arenas on my issues. She was simply used by the senior member staffs against me. I, therefore, emailed the director of studies on 26 June 2013 requesting to defer my personal tutor issue until I come back from home. The director of studies then forwarded my request email to Ms Dora on 26 June 2013. She emailed me on the same day with her new threats. She threated me to refer to the disability learning support team on her capacity as Law School disability tutor and it would be before I go home. 33. I would like to add here for your clarification that Ms Dora almost forced me to fill up a disability form after I further began attending the classes from the mental health hospital. I always ignored the roles made by the program leader and Dora and others over any false advantage on this issue. I therefore, ignored their offers when I was asked by them to sit for exams in a separate room with enough extra time. Such offer seemed to me illegal as I was technically taken to the mental health hospital under a massive conspiracy and my university authority unofficially worked to help the outsiders on this issue. Ms Doras threats on 26 June 2013 to refer me to the disability support team came with a major question in comparison with my MC application. The MC board refused my first application without giving any reason who has not yet replied on my subsequent MC application. Does anyone concept that Miles or Dora wished any betterment towards my existing problems? I reply you boldly and spontaneously, No, Not at all. If they would seek my betterment, they would obviously help me on my MC application first, not exams with an extra time considering a disable student. They were rather feeling themselves offenders because of their silent or secret criminal conducts. And, they simply tried keeping safe records on these potential issues who started collecting some defences through my activities. Thus, the offer to sit for exams in a separate room with an extra time must be considerable for real mental health patients but it was totally different in terms of case. 34. I would like to confirm that I was taken to the mental health hospital based on my emails to the local MP. I do strongly believe that Mr Martin, Ms Anne Marrie were interestingly involved as secret informers behind this nasty scenario. Mr Martin spoke to her over phone in front of me before he sent me to her using his utmost technique. I, therefore, called Martin back in front of Anne Marrie why he sent me there. I added him that I thought it was about my immigration related advice when I had an existing visa application at UK Border Agency. I, then, forwarded my mobile to Ms Anne Marrie to talk with Martin who continued around 10 minutes about my matters. I noticed that Ms Anne Marrie was confused of her roles first but Martin kept her under pressure explaining universitys detrimental situation. 35. I do strongly believe that the above authorities were just trying their best to find a way out. This is because senior staff members and tutors were directly involved with criminal activities. Their involvements were with the dirty politics at outside. In a reference, I would like to highlight you that I was asked to take my ECG and urine test as soon as I was taken CMHT. I believe that these were done to test whether I was a heroine addicted or not. But those test reports were not put into the system of CMHT yet. This might have been destroyed when the local MP’s personal psychiatrists found nothing. I asked the hospital authority for many times over phone to have those reports but failed so far. I also have planned to put my formal complaint about such mistreatments in CMHT why the reports were not put in the system. Arent these evil practices raising many new multiple tricky questions? Thank you, Sincerely yours, (Md Rezaul Huda) 507A, Hackney Road London E2 9ED Mobile: 07588554458 Email: rezaulhuda@hotmail
Posted on: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 19:05:17 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015