NOTE THAT USENET DISCUSSIONS POSTED LONG AGO HAVE BEEN DELETED BY THE ARMLOAD. THAT HAVING BEEN SAID, IT IS THEN EASY FOR DAVE REITZES TO ACCUSE MARTIN SHACKELFORD OF MAKING UP POSTS THAT WERE DELETED. This is an old trick, but both Martin and I --along with certain others--kept the originals that were deleted. Some were altered. Over 10,000 old posts were erased. THEREFORE, REITZES CAN ATTACK MARTIN AS MAKING UP HIS MATERIAL: David Reitzes This is priceless: Martin Shackelford, whos been caught red-handed making up evidence out of thin air (imaginary Shaw/ZRCLIFF document, imaginary Al Navis document, imaginary Usenet discussions he claims weve had...) and refuses to respond to inquiries about the loads of evidence he used to claim existed for batshit crazy Judyths story, casts stones at the reliability of others. (JVB: Martin and I have disputes--he believes the Z film hasnt been altered, allowing the people over at JFK-The truth to pillory him. Al Navis is now dead, so Al cant defend himself, but I was one of the last people to talk to him before he died. I helped Al with his book. Reitzes didnt even come close to Navis and knows nothing about him. Remember--name calling is a favorite tactic of those engaged in killing the truth. Lets not descend to their level.]
Posted on: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 03:46:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015