National sovereignty is in fact the most fundamental and most important pillar of political state. Simply because Sovereignty is with out question vital in establishing political authority and political accountability. Which clearly proves that people shape their own destiny collectively. Therefor, we can conclude that any institution or body which forwards or advocates the abolishing of sovereignty ( National sovereignty) and internationalism or Globalism in fact are NOT! political entities bust rather they are economical in short ( Corporatism )...... And why?, for the simple fact that as I have explained, you cannot have a political state with out national sovereignty....I mean if we look at lets say even empires...The concept of an empire even though involves the control and ownership of vast territories/countries etc. By one nation or state...In such a scenario we are still dealing with one sovereign nation at the helm, because empires are ultimately political institutions....However if we now draw our attention to the economical institution of Corporatism. We will find that in the view of the Commercial/Corporate institutions, national boundaries, borders or even sovereigntys are not recognised, and that all territories, lands and peoples are free game and are not off limits when Capital/Business interests are concerned.... I think that it is also crucial that I point ut one other very important point here....The type of Corporatism which we in America, and also other areas of the world have become more and more involved in matters of state and are gaining more and more footing in to the halls of government..Is in fact ( Progressive Corporatism ) which incidentally and very interestingly it so happens forwards the very same objective and agenda as Hamilton and Henry C. Careys system ( American School of economics/Capitalism )...Please take note of clause 2 at the bottom half of the post bellow which I have placed in brackets. , with the definition of Progressive Corporatism, the definition which I have also provided. You will see that the similarities between Hamiltons ( Capitalism ) and ( Progressive Corporatism ) are in fact almost identical...By the way, when looking over Hamiltons American School of economics, you will also note that all main emphases is placed primarily on Government control. -Darius Radmanesh -The American School of economics Central policies The American School included three cardinal policy points: Support industry: The advocacy of protectionism, and opposition to free trade - particularly for the protection of infant industries and those facing import competition from abroad. Examples: Tariff of 1816 and Morrill Tariff Create physical infrastructure: Government finance of internal improvements to speed commerce and develop industry. This involved the regulation of privately held infrastructure, to ensure that it meets the nations needs. Examples: Cumberland Road and Union Pacific Railroad Create financial infrastructure: A government sponsored National Bank to issue currency and encourage commerce. This involved the use of sovereign powers for the regulation of credit to encourage the development of the economy, and to deter speculation. Examples: First Bank of the United States,Second Bank of the United States, and National Banking Act[12] Henry C. Carey, a leading American economist and adviser to Abraham Lincoln, in his book Harmony of Interests, displays two additional points of this American School economic philosophy that distinguishes it from the systems of Adam Smith or Karl Marx: Government support for the development of science and public education through a public common school system and investments in creative research through grants and subsidies. ( Rejection of class struggle, in favor of the Harmony of Interests between: owners and workers, farmer and manufacturers, the wealthy class and the working class. ) Progressive corporatism[edit] From the 1850s onward progressive corporatism developed in response to classical liberalism and Marxism.[5] These corporatist supported providing group rights to members of the middle classes and working classes in order to secure cooperation among the classes.[5] This was in opposition to the Marxist conception of class conflict.[5] By the 1870s and 1880s, corporatism experienced a revival in Europe with the creation of workers unions that were committed to negotiations with employers.[5] Ferdinand Tönnies in his work Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (Community and Society) of 1887 began a major revival of corporatist philosophy associated with the development of Neo-medievalism and increased promotion of guild socialism, and causing major changes of theoretical sociology.[22] Tönnies claims that organiccommunities based upon clans, communes, families, and professional groups are disrupted by the mechanical society of economic classes imposed by capitalism.[22]The National Socialists used Tönnies theory to promote their notion of Volksgemeinschaft (peoples community).[23] However Tönnies opposed Nazism and joined the Social Democratic Party of Germany in 1932 to oppose fascism in Germany and was deprived of his honorary professorship by Adolf Hitler in 1933.[24]
Posted on: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:03:17 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015