Notice of my Expectations as a Sovereign Man Man is free the moment he wishes to be - Voltaire “If you don’t choose the creator then you choose the alternative a foreign king” 1 Samual 8 Dear Queen Lizzard Beth of England (Or more formally titled) “Her Most Excellent Majesty Elizabeth the Second by the Grace of God Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland & her other realms & territories Head of the Commonwealth defender of the faith” (Or more uncommonly known as) “Elizabeth Alexandra Mary : Guelph” of the Saxe – Coburg – Gotha bloodline, a living breathing, flesh & blood human being who was born in The City of London on the 21st April 1926” The CROWN (NRGD 063 253 029) is nothing more than an independent Private, non register Corporate entity operating as a trust The people of every State, & every part of the Commonwealth are Subjects to the discretions of this non disclosing commercial entity As you proclaim/parade around as the purported Queen of Australia, I remind ewe that ewe are nothing more than a public servant, part & parcel of the U.K. Parliament & thus consequently have no hold or any executive Authority over Australia, nor have ewe ever had any executive Authority over Australia The Privy Council has confirmed “The Queen” cannot by British Law hold a Constitutional or Executive position other than the United Kingdom. That as the British Parliament has no Executive Authority over Australia, therefore the Queen cannot have Authority over Australia It has come to my attention/awareness that the deception within our Legal system has been acknowledged as far back as the year 596 A.D. when the Archbishop of Canterbury proclaimed the first Coronation of a British Monarch, King Ethelbert of Kent. It can be established/construed that this was the beginning of Ecclesiastical law (Church & State combine) Any Monarch that has been empowered by The Church via Coronation will be directed & controlled by his/her Masters/Maker. “I Conclude all British Monarchs since 596 A.D. have been subject to the discretion’s of The Vatican” (The ultimate holding Company to The CROWN (NRGD 063 253 029) Contractus legume ex conventione accipiunt “Contracts receive legal validity from the agreement of the parties” “I Declare that there are six essential elements necessary for a legally binding contract formation An agreement, Consideration, Capacity to enter legal relations, Intention by the parties to enter legal relations, Formalities, & Certainty” “I Man Chester living in Body as a Secured Party rejects all Offers of Contract (Implied or Express) that do not provide namely; a) Full disclosure b) equal consideration c) Lawful terms & conditions d) Bona-fide signatures of the parties “I Man Chester Declare that there is No legal/ Lawful Bona-fide Contract, I Conclude there is No breach of Contract, so thus No compensation for payment (fine) The Commonwealth Constitution empowered the Federal Parliament to make Laws with respect to Weights & Measures (section 51 (xv) ) When the STATE & Territory Laws conflict with The Federal Act the Constitution provides Section 109 “That the Federal Act prevails” The National Measurement Act 1960 Section 10 & 12 Trade Contracts, terms & formalities “I Man Chester Declare that All Speed measuring instruments currently being used by All the NRGD ( Non Registered Governed Department) Corporate Police Force’s in Australia are not Patent approved by the Federal Regulatory Authority for measuring instruments to insure accurate measurement & Certificate accuracy (Traceability)” Common Law – Common sense, Speed measuring instruments/devices are unlawful & any evidence given is nothing more than prima facie evidence National Measurement Act 1960 Section 19b “A PERSON shall not falsely represent that an instrument is in accordance with a Patent so approved” (Penalty $6000 or $30,000 for a Company) Freedom of Information Act 1992 Request (1) I assuredly will require a Certified copy of the letters Patent, for the Signification & pleasure of Her Majesties Royal Assent to the 1975 Victorian Constitution Act No 8750/1975 (2) I will require a Certified copy of the Queensland Parliaments Hansard showing where the document developed by the National Road Transport Commission, commonly referred to as The Road Rules – Queensland or Periodical P2 (Sic) has been laid on the table of The Parliament for the required period of time (3) I Naturally require a Certified copy of the Patent approval of The National Standards Commission (Sic) (NSC) for the Regulatory Approved Device (Speed Camera in question) pursuant to Section 10 of The National Measurement Act 1960 (4) I Obviously require a Certified copy of the Certificate approving the area on as a Certified Approved Speed detection site (5) I Certainly require a Certified copy of the test results (Of the Speed Camera in question) to include the following from the test dates of the age of the Speed Camera & how many tests performed I) The accuracy of the test II) The accuracy of the testing device III) The ambient temperature of the testing room IV) The humidity of the testing room V) The Calibration used & result VI) The Patent Approval Number of the device VII) The re-verification of measurement used & the results VIII) The Speed Calibration device, measurements & results IX) The power source used for the testing equipment & (Of the Speed Camera in question) X) All the results to be in Australian legal units of measurement (6) I will require the Certification Number, the re-verification of measurement used, the easurement & results, the electro magnetic variance, measurement & result & the power source used to perform tests (All the results to be in Australian legal units of measurements) (7) I will require a Certified copy of the Queensland Institute of technology Certificate approval pursuant to Section 10 of the National Weights & Measurements Act to Certify & approve measurement devices (8) I Assuredly require a Certified copy of the Technical Officer of the Queensland Institute of Technology Certificate of Certification, approval & qualifications pursuant to the National Weights & Measurement Act 1960 to test, Calibrate & Certify a measuring device of any kind (9) I will require a Certified copy of the Queensland Roads Authority to keep & maintain & give personal details of prior convictions to the third party entity of the applicant (10) I will require a Certified copy of the ability & range of the prolaser Speed measuring device (Speed Camera) used on the day/night of the alleged infringement (11) I will require a Certified copy of the current documents/contacts/deeds that Contractually bind The Roads Corporation (NRGD 050 984 186) Queensland Roads & the Queensland Police Traffic Camera Office & any Contract with the STATE of Queensland pursuant to Section 124b of The Magistrates Court Act 1989 (12) I will require a Certified copy of the current documents/contacts/deeds that Contractually bind the Queensland Roads & vests them in “fee simple” with the Roads Corporation (NRGD 050 948 966) (13) I will require a Certified copy of any alleged Statutory Declaration/documents/contact/deed that Contractually binds The Roads Corporation (NRQD 050 948 186) & The Queensland Roads with MAN CHESTER, a juristic PERSON, an abstract, legal entity, an Ens-legis such as a Corporation/Corporate sole, fraudulently created by Construct of Law & considered as possessing certain legal Rights & Duties of a Human being (14) I Finally require the name of the restaurant that the Corporate suits (that you felch & franchise Law for) eat their Lobster & Caviar at John & Joan CITIZEN’S expense Pattern approval is conducted by The National Standards Commission only, in accordance with The National Measurement Act 1960, & not by any other Body Corporate or STATE Government Corpus Delicti “For a Crime to exist, there must be an injured party (Corpus Delicti). There can be no sanction or penalty imposed on one because of this Constitutional Rights” Sherer v Cullen 481 F. 945 Supreme Courts ruled “Without Corpus Delicti there can be no Crime. In every Prosecution for Crime it is necessary to establish the Corpus Delicti, i.e. the body or the elements of the Crime” People v Lopez 62 Ca. Rptr. 47,, 254. C.A 2nd 185 “In every Criminal trial the Prosecution must prove the Corpus Delicti, or the body of the Crime itself, i.e The fact of injury, loss or harm & the existence of a Criminal Agency as its cause” People v Sapp (2003) 73 P. 3d 433, 467 “I Man Chester Declare, that there is No Injured Party, so thus there can be no one crying out for Compensation” Signature Date Without prejudice 1-308 man living in body
Posted on: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:43:16 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015