Old but interesting item: UK man wins court case against BBC for 911 cover up. A good way for more people to keep BBC just a tinsy bit more honest .... Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day. (video below - with timestamp and building clearly still standing when allegedly already fallen). So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee. Reported twice before it actually fell!
Posted on: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:37:13 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015