Rebelling Against and Removing the (Muslim) Ruler Fatawaa from Shaykh ibn Baaz (rahimahullah), Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (rahimahullah) & Shaykh Saalih al- Faawzan (hafidhaullah) The basic comprehensive principle of sharee’ah is that it is not permitted to remove an evil by means of a greater evil; evil must be warded off by that which will remove it or reduce it. Warding off evil by means of a greater evil is not permitted according to the scholarly consensus (ijmaa’) of the Muslims. If this group which wants to get rid of this ruler who is openly committing kufr is able to do so, and can bring in a good and righteous leader without that leading to greater trouble for the Muslims or a greater evil than the evil of this ruler, then that is OK. But if rebellion would result in greater trouble and lead to chaos, oppression and the assassination of people who do not deserve to be assassinated, and other forms of major evil, then that is not permitted. Rather it is essential to be patient and to hear and obey in matters of good, and to offer sincere advice to the authorities, and to pray that they may be guided to good, and to strive to reduce evil and increase good. This is the correct way which should be followed, because that is in the general interests of the Muslims, and because it will reduce evil and increase good, and because this will keep the peace and protect the Muslims from a greater evil. Source: Majmoo’ Fataawa wa Maqaalaat Mutanawwi’ah li Samaahat al-Shaykh al-‘Allaamah ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Baaz (may Allah have mercy on him), vol. 8, p. 202 Is it obligatory to obey a ruler who does not rule according to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)? The ruler who does not rule according to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) should be obeyed in matters that do not involve disobedience towards Allah and His Messenger, and it is not obligatory to fight him because of that; rather it is not permissible to do so unless he reaches the level of kufr, in which case it becomes obligatory to oppose him and he has no right to be obeyed by the Muslims. Ruling according to anything other than that which is in the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger reaches the level of kufr when two conditions are met: 1. When he knows the ruling of Allah and His Messenger; if he is unaware of it, then he does not commit kufr by going against it. 2. When what makes him rule by something other than that which Allah has revealed is the belief that it is a ruling that is not suitable for our time and that something else is more suitable than it and more beneficial for people. If these two conditions are met, then ruling by something other than that which Allah has revealed constitutes kufr which puts a person beyond the pale of Islam, because Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And whosoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed, such are the Kaafiroon (i.e. disbelievers)” [al-Maa’idah 5:44]. The authority of the ruler becomes invalid and he has no right to be obeyed by the people; it becomes obligatory to fight him and remove him from power. But if he rules by something other than that which Allah has revealed whilst believing that ruling by that – i.e. that which Allah has revealed – is what is obligatory, and that it is more suitable for the people, but he goes against it because of some whims and desires on his part or because he wants to wrong the people under his rule, then he is not a kafir; rather he is a faasiq (evildoer) or a zaalim (wrongdoer). His authority remains, and obeying him in matters that do not involve disobedience to Allah and His Messenger is obligatory, and it is not permissible to fight him or remove him from power by force or to rebel against him, because the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) forbade rebelling against rulers unless we see blatant kufr for which we have proof from Allah. Source: Majmoo’ Fataawa Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (2/118] Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan said: It is impermissible to oppose and rebel against the leader of Muslim affairs. Rather, it is an obligation to obey him and forbidden to oppose him due to what that entails of bloodshed, disunity, and the ruining and alienation of a nation. And you all witness now those lands in which people revolted against their leaders. You see the results such as fighting and killing, bloodshed, and the loss of safety and security when some of these leaderships are not Muslim governments. But anytime people rebel against their leaders, the same thing occurs – that which occurred in Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and every other place. So what if the ruler is Muslim? It is certainly not allowed to oppose him due to what that will result in of bloodshed, the loss of security, the opportunity for non-Muslims to gain control over Muslims, and dissension and division among Muslims. Taken from a translated transcription of a cassette (the first side) titled: “al-Liqaa al-Maftooḥ” given in May, 2004 by Saalih al- Faawzan. https://dawatussalafiyyah.wordpress/2014/07/12/rebelling-against-and-removing-the-ruler/
Posted on: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 10:08:22 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015