The Trial of Dorian Gray... Wilde’s three trials in 1895 served, in effect, as an obscenity prosecution of The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde (1890/91). Though the novel was not formally charged with obscenity, Dorian Gray’s first reviewers suggested that it was obscene, and the book remained unavailable in England for nearly two decades after Wilde’s trials. The novels relation to Wildes trials thus raises a number of questions about the use of fiction as legal evidence and about the ways in which a criminal prosecution might be taken to reveal the meaning of the defendants writings. This essay discusses the late Victorian campaign against obscene literature and the victims of that campaign; the reviews of the original version of Dorian Gray (in Lippincotts Magazine, 1890); the oblique manner in which the innuendo about its obscenity functioned during Wildes three trials (1895); Wildes own ironic engagement, at several key points in the novel, with the conception of influence at work in the legal test governing the evaluation of obscenity (R. v. Hicklin, 1868); the relation of the painting itself, and of the notorious French novel that Dorian borrows from Lord Henry, to that conception of influence; and Wildes reenactment of his ironic perspective at the narrative level: papers.ssrn/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2373784
Posted on: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 22:01:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015