The bad news first. The Peoples Republic of China now believes it can successfully prevent the United States from intervening in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan or some other military assault by Beijing. Now the good news. China is wrong — and for one major reason. It apparently disregards the decisive power of Americas nuclear-powered submarines. Moreover, for economic and demographic reasons Beijing has a narrow historical window in which to use its military to alter the worlds power structure. If China doesnt make a major military move in the next couple decades, it probably never will. The U.S. Navys submarines — the unsung main defenders of the current world order — must hold the line against China for another 20 years. After that, America can declare a sort of quiet victory in the increasingly chilly Cold War with China. How China win The bad news came from Lee Fuell, from the U.S. Air Forces National Air and Space Intelligence Center, during Fuells testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 30. For years, Chinese military planning assumed that any attack by the Peoples Liberation Army on Taiwan or a disputed island would have to begin with a Pearl Harbor-style preemptive missile strike by China against U.S. forces in Japan and Guam. The PLA was so afraid of overwhelming American intervention that it genuinely believed it could not win unless the Americans were removed from the battlefield before the main campaign even began. A preemptive strike was, needless to say, a highly risky proposition. If it worked, the PLA just might secure enough space and time to defeat defending troops, seize territory, and position itself for a favorable post-war settlement. But if China failed to disable American forces with a surprise attack, Beijing could find itself fighting a full-scale war on at least two fronts: against the country it was invading plus the full might of U.S. Pacific Command, fully mobilized and probably strongly backed by the rest of the world. That was then. But after two decades of sustained military modernization, the Chinese military has fundamentally changed its strategy in just the last year or so. According to Fuell, recent writings by PLA officers indicate a growing confidence within the PLA that they can more-readily withstand U.S. involvement. The preemptive strike is off the table — and with it, the risk of a full-scale American counterattack. Instead, Beijing believes it can attack Taiwan or another neighbor while also bloodlessly deterring U.S. intervention. It would do so by deploying such overwhelmingly strong military forces — ballistic missiles, aircraft carriers, jet fighters, and the like — that Washington dare not get involved. The knock-on effects of deterring America could be world-changing. Backing away from our commitments to protect Taiwan, Japan, or the Philippines would be tantamount to ceding East Asia to Chinas domination, Roger Cliff, a fellow at the Atlantic Council, said at the same U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission hearing on Jan. 30. Worse, the worlds liberal economic order — and indeed, the whole notion of democracy — could suffer irreparable harm. The United States has both a moral and a material interest in a world in which democratic nations can survive and thrive, Cliff asserted. Fortunately for that liberal order, America possesses by far the worlds most powerful submarine force — one poised to quickly sink any Chinese invasion fleet. In announcing its readiness to hold off the U.S. military, the PLA seems to have ignored Washingtons huge undersea advantage.
Posted on: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:31:47 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015