The question in the plaintiffs case is whether UPS violated the - TopicsExpress



          

The question in the plaintiffs case is whether UPS violated the law through its policy of providing temporary light-duty work only to employees who had on-the-job injuries, were disabled under federal law or lost their federal driver certification. If you were painting your house and fell off a ladder, or if you had a ski accident, that wouldnt qualify for restricted light duty. Thats where pregnancy fell at that time. It was not covered in any state law except Californias, UPS contends.
Posted on: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:25:59 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015