There would be some validity in the view, that DISABLING someone who might be armed would have been better than the TERMINATION of a LIFE on CONJECTURAL SUSPICION, or even where there remained NO doubt that the criminal WAS armed, and CERTAIN to use the weapon against ARMED POLICE. Surely a marksman would be able to aim at the appropriate limb which would prevent the armed man from even being able to fire at ANYONE, and thus not risking the police from ABROGATING unnecessarily, their function as PUBLIC SERVANTS, and NOT being regarded as PUBLIC EXECUTIONERS. NO state should employ ANY form of death penalty, except in EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. The STATE SHOULD be in the PROTECTION of each and EVERY individual, who was, from the beginning of PREHISTORIC TIME, was born with NO referral by-your-leave to some external, and UNRELATED third party. NO ONE who decided to have a child, should HAVE to be required to obtain PUBLIC PERMISSION to do so. The ONLY RAISON DÊTRE for the EXISTENCE of the STATE should be to preserve JUSTICE for those living within an AGREED area, and NOT the setting up of a FICTIONAL CONGLOMERATION of groups of people, and SUBJECT the groups to ARBITRARY SUPERVISION on matters which should not be considered as IMPINGING on other families, whose RIGHT to have a family should be regarded as likewise, provided that there is NO EVIDENCE of ANY ONE group endeavouring to GARNER surrounding resources to themselves, at the RISK of life to others through INANITION, or even STARVATION. Likewise where one group threatens the LIVES of others by some heinous ACT. But once ANY member of the area threatens ANY other member, should be restrained by some humane means, and NOT the taking of life, unless that there were to be NO alternative, and the LIVES of others were to remain in danger,and there be means of SAFELY expelling that person from the area. This should be EXCEPTIONAL, and NOT run of the MILL. FREEDOM should be UNCONDITIONAL, provided that it does not IMPINGE on others FREEDOM. PERSONAL BELIEF should NEVER be DICTATED by ANY third party, unless that belief were to advocate the DEATH of a THIRD PARTY, or an INTERNAL member, since this could cause DISSENSION to the Grouping formed to adumbrate ORDER in the area. If the above is impossible to bring to FRUITION, then it might be preferable to DESIST from making any mention of FREEDOM. The fact that the men of the FICTIONAL GROUPING given the nomenclature of NATION are often FORCED to sacrifice their LIVES for this FICTION, and fighting the BATTLE of those that desire to make their point in this COUNTER PRODUCTIVE fashion, which is their PREROGATIVE, as the leaders of this FICTION, should they wish to RISK THEIR LIVES for something which is MOST LIKELY going to create FURTHER, even MORE insuperable PROBLEMS, at considerable COST to the general public, for NO SATISFACTORY solution to the ORIGINAL REASON for a POINTLESS CONFLICT. Where does FREEDOM, and FREEWILL occur in these ARTIFICIAL circumstances?
Posted on: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:47:19 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015