This is a letter I wrote to Rep. Walter Jones aide who came to a table talk a couple of weeks ago. Please read the previous e-mails attached at the end of this letter first to be able to understand this letter. Catherine, Thank you for the information you sent me in your e-mail. I will attempt to point out the problems I have with your remarks. Then I would like to have you show this and our previous e-mails, to Walter to get his input on my remarks. I am assuming that you have spoken with him about these issues since your e-mail also reflects his opinion on these issues. I) In your first sentence you state that “over a dozen legal cases have been brought regarding this issue but have all been dismissed”. This is the problem with these cases i.e. they were brought to the courts for disposition. We all know that on 1/21/2009, his first day in office, he signed and implemented E.O. 13489. This instructs the official archivist which specific documents may not be disclosed. With all the problems America has, doesn’t it seem suspicious that the very first order of business to be signed off on, was an E.O. which states that only the records he chooses can be made public? Why has he been given this latitude? It seems to me the reason is that our elected representatives are afraid of him and the liberal/progressive media in this country. These supposed representatives of the people are afraid the liberal/progressive media will call them a racist because they even questioned his qualifications, as he is the first black man to be president. Actually here’s a bit of news for you, he is not the first black president of the United States. He is the first mulatto president of the United States, there is a difference. As far as the liberal/progressive media is concerned, they already hate conservatives. They have been acting as Obama’s propaganda wing since before he first took office, and nothing you can do will make them like you. Get over it, it’s not going to change and they will only continue to use conservatives if it helps further their agenda. Once they don’t need you any more, they will stop putting up with you and go back to hating you. The democrats, liberal/progressive news media, and the illegal alien in our White House have all been playing the republicans and conservatives for chumps for the last couple of decades, and you let them get away with it every time. It doesn’t seem like anyone in DC has the backbone to stand up and at least question him, or so it would seem from anyone outside of the beltway. The point is, if a congressional investigation was seated and all the questions I will list below were asked of him, he would have to answer them. This is supposing that the congressional investigation would not let him stonewall and drag it out until his term is up and he has gotten away with it. Because he will do this, and the republicans will say “Let us not look back, that is the past, let’s look to the future to make sure it doesn’t happen again.” This is the cowardice I believe Eric Holder was referring to when he said “America was a nation of cowards” with regards to discussing race in this country. The questions “We the People” want answered are those that have been briefly reported on and then covered up by the liberal/progressive main stream media to wit: 1. Why is there no record of Obama, who lived as a youth in Indonesia and was know as Barry Soetoro, to have legally changed his name to Obama? 2. In October 2008, why did the Hawaiian Democratic Party refuse to certify Obama as constitutionally eligible, and provide the DNC with an Official Certification of Nomination which omitted the words: “Legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution”? 3. How was he able to travel to Pakistan in 1981, during a time when our State Department had Pakistan on its “no travel” list? Where does his passport say he is from that would have allowed him to take these trips? 4. Why is it purported that Obama is using a social security number that is reserved for residents of Connecticut issued sometime during 1976-77, when there is no record of him ever living or working in Conn? He was 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at that time. 5. Why has it been reported that Obama’s social security number failed when it was run through the government E-Verify program? 6. Why have numerous experts, the most prominent being Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who performed exhausted research into Obama’s long form birth certificate and his selective service records, found that both are fraudulent? Sheriff Joe used experienced retired police officers, FBI agents, lawyers and other experts for this research gathering, yet no one on Capital Hill has questioned this? He has mountains of evidence which confirms these findings. These are just some of the questions that “We the People” have and want the answers to. Since Obama would have to answer and show proof of his answers to a congressional investigation, it will not have to involve the courts. That is unless Obama takes it to the Supreme Court trying to hide/cover-up evidence. This has been a common ploy of presidents under investigation by congressional committees in the past, i.e. Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton. If Obama can answer these questions to the American people’s satisfaction, then good he should be president and this can all be dropped. If not, then he does not have to be impeached (he can not be anyway because it was never legal for him to be President of the United States) but thrown out of the White House and into jail while he is awaiting trial for perpetuating this scam on the American people. II) In your third sentence of the first paragraph you state; “Walter hopes Obama would allow for the State of Hawaii to release documentation regarding his birth, specifically his long-form birth certificate so that this issue can be put to rest.” I don’t understand what he is waiting for? Obama displayed his LFBC on the White House web site in April 2012. In this document it can clearly be see that his father is a subject of Great Britain. It is clear from the papers of our Founding Fathers that they relied upon De Vattel’s “Law of Nations” as a primary reference when writing the Constitution and defining a “natural born”, which has been affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 4 cases. Most often quoted, Minor V Happersett, 88 US 162 (1875). The issue is very clear. The Constitution, Art II, Sec, 1, Clause V states: “No person, except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President”… To be a U.S. citizen a person must either be born in the country or have at least one parent legally qualified to transmit citizenship to his/her children. The birth certificate, which he has produced, has been deemed fraudulent by forensic experts therefore he cannot rely upon that to prove his eligibility. His father cannot transmit American citizenship. It is documented, on his fraudulent birth certificate, that his father was a British subject of Kenyan origin, so he cannot transmit American citizenship to his son. Although his mother was an American citizen, she cannot transmit citizenship to her son because U.S. law at the time required that any U.S. citizen having a child with a non-citizen must have been physically present in the U.S. for at least five years after the age of 16 to automatically transmit American citizenship. She was not (she was 18 at the time of his birth). Neither parent could defer American citizenship unless he provides a valid birth certificate proving his father was a US citizen at the time of his birth. If he can not, then he fails the “Natural Born” requirement. He has spent $2 million to prevent anyone from seeing it. Doesn’t that arouse suspicion in you? It sure does to me. III) In your second paragraph you state; “Also, a movement has begun for states to require that the citizenship of a candidate be established beyond a shadow of a doubt. This is a movement which has Congressman Jones’ complete support. He agrees that there should be no question regarding the citizenship of a candidate for the presidency, House of Representatives, Senate, or any other public office. Meeting that standard is necessary to uphold Article II, Section of our U.S. Constitution.” To this point I must state the obvious, that this has not been a problem in all of our country’s history until this illegal alien became president and on 1/21/2009, his first day in office signed into law and implemented E.O. 13489, “Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidential Records”, which instructs the official Archivist which specific documents may not be disclosed, “which he believes may raise substantial question of executive privilege.” With all the problems facing America, doesn’t it raise suspicion that he has something to hide, if the very first order of business is to sign off on an E.O. which states that only the records he chooses can be made public? He is supposed to live by the same laws of the land that we the people have to. I would behoove Walter to not waste his time and our money looking into this movement. Just get a few like minded legislators to demand a congressional investigation into this eligibility issue and call press conferences to proclaim if or what the House leadership is doing to either help or hinder the formation of this investigation. Might I also point out at this time that both the democrats and republicans by themselves do not have the votes to win an election on their own. It is the independent voters (of which I am one) whom are often quoted as the voters each party is trying to woo to get the needed extra votes. Over the last decade at least, I have heard it expounded by the republicans that they must reach across the isle to make a compromise and not to offend the center and left of center independents who they need. Well did it ever occur to you that there are center and right of center independents who have given up on your party precisely for this reason. Your party has either backed down or watered down any legislation to the point that it means nothing but to be used to show your voters that you are working hard for them at election time. What you are seeing is independents giving up on your party and opting not to vote. I have voted ever since I was 18 (I’m now 61) in every presidential election as a conservative, except for Nixon’s second term as President. I did vote for Nixon, I just also voted everybody else running for any office for the democrat candidate because I knew Nixon was lying about the break in at the Watergate, and I was pissed off that he had the temerity to lie to the American people on national TV. It worked as he resigned just at the last minute before he went to trial in the senate and ran the risk of loosing his cushy pension he would get for being president. As far as the links that you included in your e-mail, they are so outdated as to be a joke. Much more has happened in the interim and if this is what you and Walter are going by, for the love of God and your constituents, update yourselves! In closing I would like to say that when you came to talk at our Tea Party meeting, you did nor could seem to give us any information other than “We don’t know either what is going on or going to happen.” So you disclosed no useful information to those of us present, other than a lame show of professed interest in keeping our group informed on the issues. My take was it was a complete waste of time to have attended. When I asked you about pushing for a congressional investigation you stopped me and proclaimed that, and I quote; “The Supreme Court has ruled that Obama meets the requirements to hold the office of president, it has been settled.” Against my better judgment, I didn’t push the matter. I thought I would wait and see if in fact you had information that I had missed, which I knew at the time was unlikely, I was right and you didn’t have anything to back up your statement. This tells me one of two things; either you were grossly incompetent in your preparation for our meeting, or you used an old democrat/liberal trick of lying to stop potentially embarrassing questions and give you time to escape the meeting without having to answer the question. In fact if you remember, you told me that you would see me at the end of the meeting to exchange e-mail address. I had to run after you to get your e-mail address as you seemed to be trying to slip out before you had to speak to me. Just so you know I will be posting our previous e-mails, this e-mail, and yours’ and Walters response on my social media page, as well as my Tea Party page so that the constituents in this area will be able to follow and see your response. I, as an American citizen, want to know why his past is such a mystery and why not one of our elected representatives have questioned him on these points, but instead have let him get away with it through two election cycles. While our representatives may not want to know, “We the People” do. If Walter thinks every thing is hunky dory as is, might I suggest that he call for a congressional investigation and get the American people the answers we have been asking for. After the investigation is finished, he could just not read the final report and continue to live in la la land. At least the American people would get the answers they want and have been asking for these past 5 years. First e-mail; To [email protected] Sep 25 Hello Catherine, I spoke with you on Tuesday night at the ENCTP meeting. You had told me that the Supreme Court had ruled that Obama was eligible to hold the office of President of the US. Could you please send me your information on this as soon as possible? Thank you for your timely response, Bear Marucci Eastern North Carolina Tea Party Second e-mail; Sep 26 Bear, Ever since Barack Obama became a candidate for the presidency, questions have arisen regarding his citizenship. Over a dozen legal cases have been brought regarding this issue but all have been dismissed. It is the congressman’s hope that President Obama would allow for the State of Hawaii to release documentation regarding his birth, specifically his long-form birth certificate so that this issue can be put to rest. Also, a movement has begun for states to require that the citizenship of a candidate be established beyond a shadow of a doubt. This is a movement which has Congressman Jones’ complete support. He agrees that there should be no question regarding the citizenship of a candidate for the presidency, House of Representatives, Senate, or any other public office. Meeting that standard is necessary to uphold Article II, Section of our U.S. Constitution. With all of that said: here are some of the articles dating back to 2008 about the Supreme Court deciding NOT to hear any birth certificate cases: foxnews/politics/2008/12/08/supreme-court-dismisses-challenge-obamas-citizenship/ huffingtonpost/2012/06/11/supreme-court-obama-birth-certificate-case_n_1586695.html politicalticker.blogs.cnn/2011/03/07/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-from-birther-advocate/ Thank you, Catherine Fodor
Posted on: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:28:24 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015