Tietääkö hallitus paljonko CO2 hypetys maksaa yhteiskunnallemme ? Miksi jatkaa, kun ei mitään osata selittää ilmaston vaihteluista ? Would you even listen if you learned that: • Their research of global warming/climate change was deliberately narrowed by definition to only studying human causes. • You cannot determine human causes if you don’t know or understand natural causes. • The demand for political action was based on an untested hypothesis. • The standard scientific methods and tests of the hypothesis were ignored. • Computer models were created to produce the predetermined outcome. • All predictions made for 23 years were wrong. • After five years they abandoned calling them predictions and opted for the term projections. • Projections were created with low, medium and high potential scenarios. • Even the low projections were greater than what actually occurred. • Their claims of increased severe weather events proved wrong. • Their claims of sea level rise were incorrect. • The actual record since 1998 shows temperatures leveling and declining while CO2 increased. • Instead of admitting their hypothesis was wrong and amending or rejecting it, as science requires, they changed the hypothesis from global warming to climate change. • Instead of admitting their claim of 90+ percent certainty that human CO2 was the cause was wrong, they raised the claim to 95 percent certainty.
Posted on: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:34:34 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015