Uh-oh: climate change/global warming is (expectedly ) heavily politicized. Reminder: I AM NOT POLITICAL at all. But I cant help thinking this through. Heres my 2-cent worth of verbal incontinence on this topic, incited by the thought that deniers of climate change concept will heavily oppose the presidents projects in addressing climate change. This climate change topic is very very dear to me that Ive pretty much exhausted all science- based articles and books about it so that Ill have a pretty open minded grasp of it. Thing is with democrat Al Gores figuring strongly into the climate-change and environmental-crisis public awareness with his global warning slideshow and book/ movie , An Inconvenient Truth afterwards, and the global warming subject insinuating itself into school curricula ( of course the latter is not without heavy controversy) , it is so easy to equate climate change awareness and all efforts to address the crises around it as democrat effort. Remember that time when Al Gore plus Hillary maligned Michael Crichtons concepts and beliefs ( based on tons of research) which were eloquently presented in his albeit fiction novel A State Of Fear? The fact that global warming concept can be heavily scientifically argued became very apparent. In other words, these moronic politicians can just be Inholes for any quasi-scientific or even non-scientific, tunnel-vision approach and observations into the climate change issue and be assholes for farcical actions and plans and forestalling efforts.--A.Valencia
Posted on: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:01:21 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015