Wonder? Wonder when! youtube/watch?v=tPJucQWcJxk Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye State Bar of California 1149 S Hill St. Los Angeles, Calif. 90015-2299 Re: Speech: Duty, Breach, Remedy – Bar Dye Military Heads, FBI-Bar, This showing spots some county-state military heads’ treason-retaliation acts against Bonas. The top executive federal and county head acts detailed below were exacted against Bonas for his writing and representing “little folks” against big companies for their direct, material breach of their owed contract price duties. Every contract … imposes an obligation of good faith pricing …. Honesty in fact …. This opener summarizes direct proof of recorded admissions “by court acts in fact” of Robert Mueller and his entire FBI Team, now operating under Wall Street listed Lockeed Martin’s James Comey, double hard core prosecution crimes against Bonas and our Republic. To “euthanize” Bonas from writing and representing, Mueller’s FBI, with his county-state heads, used their military to twice execute terrorist acts against Bonas. FBI heads second Bonas Bite cements FBI’s criminal-terrorist allegiance to county heads, mayor military and judge terrorists. To be sure, FBI’s Muller personally undertook to arrogantly defy a “higher federal court order” instructing that “Bonas may not be touched/prosecuted by any county-state: “By bypassing the opportunity to join …, the county … government forfeited ….” FBI’s County military heads admit all of its Bonas matters hinges on speech: In 2001, Bonas made between 300 and 1,000 … telephone calls to at least eleven law firms. In addition, Bonas sent more than 1,000 e-mails to several of the same attorneys …. FBI’s deceitful double Bonas play is treason. Treason’s law of word of deceit instructs: 1. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true …; 2. The assertion, as a fact, of that which is not true …; or 3. The suppression of a fact, by one who is bound to disclose it, or who gives information of other facts … likely to mislead …, e.g. I. Background FBI’s double charge Bonas was a criminal back to back federal and state case filing in April 2001. Both of these Bush-FBI charges were brought by Bush’s Cabinet and both his federal and state military forces, FBI, U.S. Marshals and County Mayor Mercenaries. One was filed in the Central District of California (Los Angeles), the other in State Court in San Diego. a. Factual Posture Bush’s Twin FBI Bonas cases were fused from go. Both involved the exact same “case within a case”. Both root in the same “price related speech facts” and class-attorney duties. i. Federal Version The Federal government prosecuted Bonas first. It summarized the case as follows: Bonas … filed a class-action suit against three supermarket chains—Ralph’s, Von’s and Albertsons/Lucky’s— alleging price-fixing …. The supermarkets were represented … by a cadre of name-brand … law firms. Bonas and his client lost after a jury trial. According to the Bush-FBI-Mueller government, Bonas then began harassing … counsel with a barrage of e-mails and voicemail messages. The messages increased in frequency and intensity …. ii. County-State’s Version Gluing to the exact same set of facts, slightly dolled up, Bush’s FBI county-state leveled the same allegations from the same “cadre of brand name lawyers”. They carved out different “named esquire representatives” on the pleadings. Bush-FBI county complaint-indictment deceitfully reads: After the egg case was lost, Bonas engaged in a pattern of harassment against numerous attorneys and law firms, many of whom had some involvement in the egg case. During February and March 2001, Bonas made between 300 and 1,000 harassing and/or threatening telephone calls to at least eleven law firms. The anger and threats expressed by Respondent in these telephone calls increased over time. In addition, Respondent sent more than 1,000 e-mails to several of the same attorneys that he had been calling on the telephone. In FBI-Bush’s back to back Bonas plays, all quarters of both federal and state agents erased Bonas First Amendment right, privilege and immunity. Not one page of explanation did their forced public defenders write on his behalf. Not one sentence states his position. This Bush-FBI county’s “Wax-Bonas” campaign began with a 04-09-01 article published by The Daily Journal’s Mr. David Houston. It was media released four days after Bonas was taken prisoner by Central District U.S. Attorneys Ronald Cheng and John Gordon - on 04-05-01. The 04-05-01 date, in turn, was four days before a critical $300 million dollar case brief was due to be filed in the underlying “Eggs” matter – on 04-09-01. By caging Bonas, the Federal Government’s clients, the complaining Eggs case attorneys, insured that Bonas could not represent his class clients through formal briefing or oral argument. Bonas was caged for the duration of the subject appeal. His case partners “lost it” by written order dated 11-06-01. Twenty eight months after his federal arrest, on August 04, 2003 the Superior 9th Circuit Court Ordered Bonas released based on double jeopardy privileges and immunities. b. Procedure, Process Facts ... §1-304 – Obligation and duty. § 2-103 (b). Definitions and Index of Definitions. United States v. Bonas, 344 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2003). 12-30-04, State Bar v. Bonas Opinion, at page 4, lines 18-23. California Civil Code §1710. United States v. Cash Joseph Bonas, 344 F.3d 945 (9th Circuit, 2003). 12-30-04, State Bar v. Bonas Opinion, at page 4, lines 18-23. 11-06-01, SHERI MCCAMPBELL ET AL., v. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY ET AL., APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Anthony C. Joseph, Judge. Affirmed. (Super. Ct. No. 703666). United States v. Cash Joseph Bonas, 344 F.3d 945 (9th Circuit, 2003).
Posted on: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 01:26:15 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015