https://youtube/watch?v=FofDChlSILU William Lane Craig has enormous logical fallacies in his argument, which is quite surprising for anyone who majored in philosophy. (It would be embarrassing even at a high school level) Hes talking about probabilities of our existence in a universe that he construes as finite. However, an infinite universe would contain the same probabilities of our existence as a finite universe with a god. The reason why the probability would be the same is very simple: A low probability is completely negligible in a theoretically infinite time period. William Lane Craig also construes infinity impossible. However, a gods existence would be contradictory to the same mathematical limitations that he wishes to apply with that argument. The reason is because a gods power would exceed mathematical limitations and not be finite. Normally I really dislike using philosophy as a foundation for my arguments, but I couldnt help but completely destroy Mr. Craigs philosophical argument. In addition, hes yet another theist who doesnt know the difference between a gnostic atheist and an agnostic atheist, and thinks that agnosticism contradictions atheism. :\
Posted on: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:47:43 +0000