- Claim on states rights: Bundy lost on all his arguments - TopicsExpress



          

- Claim on states rights: Bundy lost on all his arguments regarding states rights and jurisdictional dispute in the United States v. Bundy cases. Bundy had argued that the US District Court for the District of Nevada lacked jurisdiction because the United States does not own the public lands in question. The court ruled “the public lands in Nevada are the property of the United States because the United States has held title to those public lands since 1848, when Mexico ceded the land to the United States. - Former Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack, who was with the protesters, controversially said that they were strategizing to put all the women up at the front. If they are going to start shooting, its going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers.[41] Protestors took position on a highway overpass, seemingly offering cover as horse-mounted wranglers led protesters to face off against heavily equipped BLM rangers and snipers.[32] - On April 19, Bundy criticized the government, specifically its negative influence on the Negro. He recalled seeing a government-housing project where some of the older residents and the kids would sit on the porch. He said, They didn’t have nothing to do ... they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do? They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.[6] WOWOWOWOWOWWWWWWWWWWWW Federal land backtax-owning moocher hypocrite gets GOP support HOW????
Posted on: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 01:53:12 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015