9/11 EXPERIMENTS March 13, 2013 at 2:25pm 9/11 EXPERIMENTS It doesnt matter what material you use, take a tower of any material and slice it across at three quarters of the way up and try dropping it on the lower piece ~ in no experiment will it ever destroy the whole bottom piece ~ it doesnt matter if you use bricks, ice, mortar, plastic, egg crates, or even 90 floors of untouched steel and concrete ~ cannot and will never happen!!! If it disagrees with experiment….. it’s wrong! ----------- JON COLES EXPERIMENTS 9/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses youtube/watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s& Jonathan Cole-911 Experiments-Collapse vs Demolition https://youtube/watch?v=e82XB52W-qk 9/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST youtube/watch?v=tejFUDlV81w 9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert youtube/watch?v=7ySUrEiVFIM NEWTONS LAWS VS. NIST - 9/11 EXPERIMENTS youtube/watch?v=-5oQ2mTwa9s 9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate youtube/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g 9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel youtube/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw ---------- 9/11 Experiments: Collapse vs. Demolition ~ Part 1 of 2 youtube/watch?v=ww8hBFNY8jk Part 2: youtube/watch?v=dgZLXI3whGA ---------- 9/11 Experiment: Egg Drop, Equal Collision disproves Bazants Pile Driver Theory youtube/watch?v=g6H0hu3tTig youtube/watch?v=9bUNNoRQack youtube/watch?v=f2KkGchyLTg --------- 9/11 Physics 101; Air, Water, or WTC Steel? You decide. youtube/watch?v=SlBjAZ4EFR0& --------- We have all seen Richard Gage do this experiment with Cardboard boxes. Many people knock him for it but I praise him for trying to explain it to the American idiots that just dont get it. Hardfire trailer ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH youtube/watch?v=hFVi4qbN2jM (Here is the same video of debunkers mocking Richard) AE911TRUTH PLAYSCHOOL WITH RICHARD GAGE. youtube/watch?v=DFVoencqfZw ---------- SNOW TOWERS! youtube/watch?v=RrSAn1V7bec youtube/watch?v=9jbVGzzsn9U& ------------- 9/11 Physics: You Cant Use Common Sense youtube/watch?v=KDHN1gBkx0M ------------------ Jenga Pistol youtube/watch?v=F9BmTmMEOhQ 9/11 Jenga (LOL) youtube/watch?v=9My8sbckwAc youtube/watch?v=s7MVAKlLFaM& ----------------- Tomato cut by samurai sword youtube/watch?v=mWjc8HVemAA ---------------- Model Replica of the WTC on 9/11 - Part 1 of 2 youtube/watch?v=aw4GW977OmI& Part 2 youtube/watch?v=HkeG_tnAh_I ---------- 9/11 Experiment: Concrete evidence. Does it pulverize when falling? youtube/watch?v=aa6pyPi386k Full version youtube/watch?v=AwPbz1eH2DA ------- 9/11 Experiment: Steel Pan Upon Fire youtube/watch?v=bkhE_BMJuc8 ------- 9/11 Experiments: Does steel weaken much under fire? youtube/watch?v=0WLitXT4yHQ ------- 9/11 Simple Experiment (Not very well done) youtube/watch?v=OjKjHEAJ5u4 youtube/watch?v=lBuH8NNIBys ------- Why Towers Did not Collapse (PROOF) youtube/watch?v=epIv0IxpuCE ------- Gravitational Collapse onto Cumulative Supports youtube/watch?v=caATBZEKL4c ------- (Part1) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition youtube/watch?v=5QMSAsOkumI -------- Nerd wins challenge with 9/11 Truth physics youtube/watch?v=YeWqHtAMZlo TBS reality show called King of the Nerds Episode 7, saw a challenge where the nerds had to guess the results of dropped weights onto layers of glass, having to guess how many glass sheets would be shattered. Danielle a nerd girl gamer (sporting cotton candy pink hair), researched a number of 9/11 Physics sites to win the challenge beating 4 other nerds including a girl called “Moogega” who works as a Nasa Engineer! Danielle thanks 9/11 conspiracy theorists for her win, thus proving on national TV the credibility of the 9/11 movement. --------- FAILED EXPERIMENTS 9/11 wasnt an inside job youtube/watch?v=tS5T_i1N6J8 The kids own experiment didnt work the way he wanted it to.... so he just destroys it with his hands. @1:25. lol --------- Charlie Veitch changing his opinion about 9/11 youtube/watch?v=V4i8nBUc2T0 LEGO TOWERS! --------- NISTS EXPERIMENTS --------- NIST WTC-report. What a laugh ... youtube/watch?v=-RzwmD8uB8g& -------- 9/11 Skepticism: NIST floor test youtube/watch?v=4W37g_uLYNs NISTs own tests failed to weaken or melt steel. ------- NIST FOIA 09-42: Release #15 -- 42A0019 -- WTC CB P1 T1 NW Camera youtube/watch?v=kfk7QBC6uZM NISTs own fire experiment failed to destroy a single cubicle in a 20 minute fire. ------- NIST FOIA: Fireproofing Condition and Upgrade on the 85th Floor of WTC2 (Video 1 of 4) youtube/watch?v=wnxOYOHM6hw ------- NIST WTC7 Collapse Simulation Versus Real-Time Demolition Comparison 1 youtube/watch?v=dUQ0xnt1iBs& NIST has refused to release the computer model input data in response to FOIA requests, claiming that its release would “jeopardize public safety. I say not releasing the data could jeopardize public safety. ----------- Debunking Novas Pancake Theory of WTC using common sense youtube/watch?v=bdQh18kvpRU ----------- EXPERIMENT WITH JET FUEL (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC) Controlled Test Proves Jet Fuel Will Make Steel Beams Fail (Test starts at 5:00) liveleak/view?i=5f1_1339245164&comments=1 Whats wrong with this experiment? 1 - Horizontal orientation of the I-beam vs actual vertical orientation of the exterior perimeter columns and massive center core columns which held up over 90% of the weight load. This test was a single beam, no trusses, no vertical supports and unattached and not bolted to any steel structure. 2 - Dimensions and type of I-beam. The I-beam used was only a scale model. Lets compare to the WTC steel 911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/hanger17.html I-beam not anywhere near equivalent to a 14 rectangular, 4 thick-walled box column with a strength rating of tens of tons psi. They used a single I Beam that was 8 in height and 18 pounds per foot and loaded it with 3,000 lbs. 3 - Placement and possible ratio as to weight used to simulate load, once again, dead center on the weakest area of the I-beam. I repeat, no vertical supports at all. 4 - No fireproofing on this I-beam because NIST states that the planes impacts knocked it all off. How could a plane knock off fireproofing in an area that wasnt even struck? 5 - 700 gallons pooled directly below the beam thus far more direct and consistent application of heat. This was also an Oxygen fed fire with 100% jet fuel in a controlled environment. 6 - How did they reach a peak temperature of 2010 degrees Fahrenheit? When the maximum temperature of Jet A-1 is only 500-599°F in open air and a 1796°F maximum burning temperature. 7 - This test failed to melt the steel I-Beam. Many expert witnesses testified to reports of Molten Steel in the rubble and sub levels of Ground Zero. 8 - This I-Beam sagged and warped. It did not explode outwards hurling the I-Beam away from initial point. 9 - Still does not explain WTC 7, since there was no Jet Fuel or plane that crashed into Building 7. 10 - National Geographic forgot to mention that fire fighters were in the towers battling the fires with water hoses. Through fire fighter radio transmissions, it is clear that the fire fighters had the fires under control. National Geographic Does 9/11: Another Icon Debased in Service of the Big Lie 911research.wtc7.net/reviews/NationalGeographic/ --------- NEWTONS LAWS OF PHYSICS Newtons Second Law engineeringtoolbox/accelaration-gravity-d_340.html Change of motion is proportional to the force applied, and take place along the straight line the force acts. From experimentation, it has been discovered that, near the surface of the Earth, Earths gravity will produce a downward acceleration of 32.2 feet per second per second. (9.81 meters per second per second) What that means is that an object: After falling one second, will be falling at 32.2 ft/sec. After the 2nd second, it will be falling at 64.4 ft/sec. After the 3rd second, it will be falling at 96.5 ft/sec. After the 4th second, it will be falling at 128.7 ft/sec. After the 5th second, it will be falling at 160.9 ft/sec. After the 6th second, it will be travelling at 193.0 ft/sec. After the 7th second, it will be travelling at 225.2 ft/sec. After the 8th second, it will be travelling at 257.4 ft/sec. After the 9th second, it will be travelling at 289.6 ft/sec. After the 10th second, it will be travelling at 321.7 ft/sec. Note! The velocity is achieved without any aero-dynamical resistance (vacuum). The air resistance will be significant for higher velocities or for object with large surface area to mass ratio - feathers or similar. As you might imagine, after quite a few such thought experiments, some simple free-fall equations have been derived which can be used to harness this knowledge via numbers and arithmetic: Velocity = Gravity x Time and Distance = 1/2 x Gravity x Time(squared) So if we want to know how far the object has free-fallen after 10 seconds: Distance = 1/2 x 32.2 x 100 = 1608.7 feet So after 10 seconds, in Earths gravity, an object will have fallen 1600 feet (488m) and will be falling at 321.7 ft/sec. --------------- Newtons law of universal gravitation en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newtons_law_of_universal_gravitation F=Gm1m2/r2 where: F is the force between the masses, G is the gravitational constant, m1 is the first mass, m2 is the second mass, and r is the distance between the centers of the masses. --------------- Gravity of Earth en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_of_Earth It has an approximate value of 9.81 m/s2, which means that, ignoring the effects of air resistance, the speed of an object falling freely near the Earths surface will increase by about 9.81 metres (about 32 ft) per second every second. This quantity is sometimes referred to informally as little g (in contrast, the gravitational constant G is referred to as big G). ------------- Newtons Universal Law of Gravitation - Science in a Minute youtube/watch?v=Jk5E-CrE1zg& Minute Physics: What is Gravity? youtube/watch?v=p_o4aY7xkXg& High School Physics: Newtons Law of Universal Gravitation youtube/watch?v=OZZGJfFf8XI& Bill Nye the Science Guy - A Gravity Demonstration youtube/watch?v=hZi8TXtRRYg&
Posted on: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:48:02 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015