A CHALLENGE TO IAN GODDARD !! j https://youtube/watch?v=sRIYZSKupMw&list=PLcp63Rw5m_QcohHCu3jEFSFuEF4Va2HHh here is what i wrote to him (again) hi Ian Goddard, as we look at peer reviewed literature we see that there are alot of arguments. Using risk models that are based on nuclear industry connected groups or individuals there is obviously a bias. And the same goes for the anti nuclear connected scientists. you seem to be quite cautious in your analysis of science posits but do not fully explain that, in the case of this video, that busby is an independent scientist who tries to quantify risk against the well funded military backed nuclear industry who claims little effect of radiation. The video attacks busbies posit but, for balance does not explain that the UK nuclear lobby Science Media Centre experts were saying at the time that there were no health effect, no meltdowns etc. Nor do you explain that even more moderate experts in this field have serious questions concerning the effects of the Fukushima nuclear disaster and, for instance, the UNSCEAR 2013 report critique by K Baverstock https://youtube/watch?v=VoBLa2K7_6Y ... It seems odd to me that you would pay so much time in breaking down Chris Busbies posit whilst the nuclear lobby, backed by the likes of WPP PR LLC are also attacking anyone who dares to highlight possible health issues to do with the nuclear fallout etc. We need C.Busby as a counterbalance to this PR campaign driven by corporations etc and as people are drawn to the subject they come across a plethora of posits, of which, can be found on the internet. I also am a bit concerned as to the timing of your release of this video (nearly 4 years after the statement as released by busby) without talking to C Busby and getting an update on his view at the present time as to the veracity of the statement (for instance has he developed this posit further?) . I would like to see a debate on this topic and in fact a debate with Joe Mangano concerning his thyroid cancer projections in California (which i think he asked for but you did not go for). In fact i contacted you at the time via your youtube PM. That would be an interesting debate instead of a one sided attack video (which this seems to be). I could certainly arrange a debate or even two if you wish (with Joe Mangano). my email is [email protected] . I have more to say on this including why the UK security services are targeting both Richard Bramhall and C busby if they have no valid arguments ?? In the interest of interested parties we should debate these issues instead of a video slamming one person or another. I would also like to see debated with Allison Wade and K Baverstock but Allsion Wade will not engage. Will you engage in such a live debate/s as i outlined? It would be most interesting.. And much more balanced courteous and professional dont you think. We are all on the same page in our search for truth. I look forward to hearing from you. Sean McGee PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS COMMENT WAS DELETED OFF IAN GODDARDS YOU TUBE ACCOUNT IMMEDIATELY WITHOUT RESPONSE!
Posted on: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 05:53:58 +0000