ANTI-SCIENCE & ANTI-LIBERTY Imprisoning Galileo for life because he didn’t agree with the accepted consensus that the Sun revolved around the Earth was not a great example of the scientific method. Environmentalist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lashed out at global warming skeptics in 2007, declaring This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors. UN official – Yvo de Boer – warned that ignoring the urgency of global warming would be criminally irresponsible. UN special climate envoy Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland – said it’s completely immoral, even, to question the UN’s scientific consensus on climate. Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki called for government leaders skeptical of global warming to be thrown into jail. It is especially troubling given the background of climate discussions... Specifically, in the 1970s, many American scientists were terrified of an imminent ice age. oBamas top science advisor – John Holdren – was one of them. He and other scientists proposed pouring soot over the arctic to melt the ice cap and so prevent the dreaded ice age. Holdren warned of dire consequences if mankind did not rally on an emergency basis to stop the coming ice age. Yet today, controlling soot may be the only way to significantly slow Arctic warming. So – whatever you think about climate – you can obviously agree that we should approach climate change from the age-old axiom of first, do no harm, making sure that our solutions do not cause more damage than the problems. And one of the main solutions to global warming which has long been pushed by the powers that be – cap and trade... WHAT A SCAM!!! Talk about treason, criminally irresponsible, and completely immoral. Our bailout buddies over at Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and the other Wall Street behemoths are buying heavily into carbon trading. In other words, the same companies that made billions off of derivatives and other scams and got bailed out on your dime are going to make billions from carbon trading. And we know cap and trade wont effectively reduce carbon emissions! So What’s the Answer? Decentralization of power generation and storage. That would empower people and communities, produce less carbon, prevent nuclear disasters like Fukushima, reduce the dangers of peak oil (and thus prevent future oil spills like we had in the Gulf), and have many other positive effects. Reducing soot would be cheaper than the decarbonation which many policy-makers have proposed. And it would increase the health of millions of people worldwide. In other words, our original policy on Energy: The Constitution does not grant the federal government the power to regulate, control, or establish a national policy for the generation and distribution of energy. They have seized that power in order to make millionaires out of civil servants who want to turn over our sovereignty to the globalists wholl make billions on taxing the air we breath. Do the Sheeple who accept the globalist consensus even realize they are promoting FACISM? Ever heard of Social Science?
Posted on: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:23:53 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015