After clear episodes of plagiarism in three speeches, that have been publicised by The Rachel Maddow Show and Buzzfeed ...Ron Paul claims that it was just a matter of giving credit to the screen writers of the Movies that he was utilizing as examples in his speeches - when it was Wikipedia that he directly quoted from in his speech without giving due credit to the website for its analysis of the film. He accused Rachel Maddow of inobjectivity, and claimed that she was (a) political enemy with an ax to grind. He never mentioned that his speech was lifted from wikipedia, and acted like he never knew what Rachel was actually referring to. I hope that he does not continue to get away with intellectual dishonesty, as he has referred to in the past - as he has proven to be a devious politician that is out for no more than his own power and success, rather than a public servant who is there to represent the people of his state.
Posted on: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:09:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015