BREAKING: Ukrainian Parliament cancelled Ukraines official neutrality, the prohibition to enter a military alliance. The bill was introduced by Poroshenko himself, Lavrovs best chance for Ukraine and the man of peace dubbed so by some circles in Moscow. If Moscow started using the notion of the common political space as a politically seemingly less explicit term for one and united Ukraine as the key principle for the resolution of the conflict in Ukraine and the fate of Novorossiya, the text of Poroshenkos bill identifies the purpose of the cancellation of Ukraines military, political and strategic neutrality with integration into Euro-Atlantic space, which is, of course, a legible cipher for NATO. Three out of the four bills that were to follow Ukraines rejection of military neutrality and the affirmation of its willingness to subordinate itself to NATO and its plans are to fix the strategic membership in NATO. Poroshenko, the best partner of the Kremlin in Kiev and his Maidan buddies thus hurried to get this watershed legislation just in time so that it can be offered as a Christmas present both to Moscow and Washington, even though with a very different effect. And also just in time of the new coming round of the Minsk talks to which, as usual, the representatives of the Donetsk and Lugansk Peoples Republics are invited mainly to be only handed decisions and documents, which had already been composed and agreed upon elsewhere. The official rejection of Ukraines neutrality, even without an official membership in NATO or its full completion, which might be formally still remote, does affirm that Ukraine under the Banderite regime is a NATO loyal and devoted proxy for which either independence or sovereignty is neither its choice nor its reality. This also affirms that the people of Ukraine are no longer merely hostage and property for their thieving oligarchs, but that their main utility is now defined as that of cannon balls and cannon fodder for a war with Russia. So is Poroshenko the best chance for Ukraine? No, he was, is and remains Ukraines best chance for war and self-destruction--at least because he as Ukraines President is leading the ongoing Nazification and Banderization of the state and society, which never meant and was never supposed to produce peace. Not peace, but war. Anyone who thought that Nazification can lead to peace was either politically incompetent or was lying. https://news.mail.ru/inworld/ukraina/politics/20559323/?frommail=1
Posted on: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:32:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015