Back to reality–science finds no relationship to vaccines Does an infection explain the 3-5% annual increase in Type 1 diabetes? First of all, it’s difficult to really determine the exact increase of diabetes in the modern era. Remember, before the 1920’s, kids simply died from diabetes, so it’s almost impossible to determine the prevalence of the diseases before then. Even after 1920, insulin was not exactly widely available, and the methods to inject it were expensive. It’s possible that up through the 1950’s, the diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes was lower than the actual number. A lot of hypotheses have been offered by the scientific world (ignoring Heinze’s unscientific logic) regarding the increase in the rate of the disease. Sure, some real scientists have actively sought out the possibility that vaccines are causal to Type 1 diabetes. But according to the best systemic reviews, the MMR vaccine is not linked to Type 1 diabetes. But don’t tell Heinze about this research, because using his vast scientific skills, he invented a link between MMR and diabetes, basically because the measles virus appeared in cell culture. There is other evidence that clearly rejects a correlation between vaccines and diabetes. The haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine is not linked to diabetes. In a large, population controlled study, there was no link, none, between any of the common childhood vaccines and Type 1 diabetes. None. There is also no evidence that HPV vaccines are related to diabetes. None.
Posted on: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:29:56 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015