Charlie Hebdo attention to the amalgam. We do not see why Muslims, true, those who took the trouble to understand the Quran and who were inspired examples left by the Holy Prophet must each be justified publicly condemning the actions of a few fanatics who does actually have nothing to do with Islam and who do not understand the true Islamic message. The screaming Allahu Akhbar during their misdeeds it is enough to amalgamate such people to Islam? And if it was declared as the UMP who intervened on France 24 stating that France was at war; a war that has imported on French soil by getting involved in an armed conflict in the Middle East where it had nothing to do? Determination and direct involvement of the French army side you will never noted in countless massacres and atrocities of the Israeli state on the besieged Palestinians. Of course, everyone is horrified and disapproves such as killing thousands of children killed in Gaza and the millions of other civilians buried under carpet bombing in Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria. If he had given us to remind ourselves of the many genocides perpetrated by tyrants of all ilk around the world we would certainly be remiss not to note that the powerful of this world have always failed in the task of protecting the weak and oppressed. Worse, we would find certainly their selfishness and their determination to safeguard their own interests above all, even an accomplice of the torturers. Charlie Hebdo of cartoons have certainly caused a lot of trouble to Muslims for whom the religious thing is sacred and is never taken lightly. They love and venerate the Holy Prophet over all people and do not tolerate that one can make fun of the Messenger of God. It is rare that a Muslim hurts the religious sensibilities of his neighbor except in debate with arguments from the holy writings. It is also rare to find Muslims to exercise the profession cartoonist while freedom of expression of the Western perspective helps to target any religious belief and any character. To be frank we readily admit that Muslims had no sympathy for Charlie Hebdo cartoonists who persisted and signed despite the suffering they caused them while being very aware of the potential danger of violent response may come from extremists; but then to kill coldly there are certainly a very small number who would be capable; just as there is a small number of French can vandalize or burn the places of worship of Muslims. Yet, despite the sad time of colonization and paid dearly independence, many North African Muslims chose to settle on French territory, working and living peacefully integrating into French society by being law-abiding. The Holy Prophet never killed; all battles, defensive besides, he led did not last more than six days and did not make more than 300 casualties on both sides. On his arrival in Medina the Prophet casts out hatred and instead built a society based on law. His goal was peace among all, first between rival tribes in Medina and then with the Jewish and Christian communities for which he enact the famous Charter of Medina. At the conquest of Mecca prohibits any act of revenge against the Meccan pagans who persecuted the Muslims before. The condemnation of such acts is instant and comes from the heart for Muslims worthy of the name who would prefer rather hear the regret and apology of these cartoonists. To return to the sad attack against Charlie Hebdo We can only hope that this kind of terrorist there is changing very fast vocation because they make us giggle. Leave astray in a stolen car his identity card after killing twelve people? Three Muslim terrorists who commit bloody attack and then leave their car in broad daylight in the middle of a Jewish neighborhood? This reminds us strangely the attack of September 11 where we had found in the middle of a pile of debris and molten metal because of the intense heat generated, the identification of the perpetrators of the attack. Nobody questioned as to the correctness of such a discovery even when the famous black boxes of the aircraft, designed to be indestructible, were never found; not to mention the many other gray areas surrounding this case. From the way things are going after the events can not be understood by the death of the alleged perpetrators in a final confrontation with the police, and the total silence about the reasons that have motivated such an act. The whole world has the right to explanations and that right we are too often denied; whether in the case of Bin Laden or Mohamed Merah we were entitled to see the account for their acts before justice of men. We were allowed to hear the confessions of Lee Oswald and Sirhan Sirhan in the same way that we could hear those Nathuram Godse, Gandhis killer; as were questioned in Nuremberg Nazi war criminals. On the other hand we are amazed at the similarity of the circumstances preceding the sad September 11 and that of the attack against Charlie Weekly. In the first case Israel was cornered by world opinion and even by his unwavering US ally who urged him to evacuate the Gaza Strip and to stop its atrocities against the Palestinians, whereas in this case we talk for a few Aliyah months, or exodus of French Jews to Israel, Britain and the United States because they do not feel adequately protected by the French government in the middle of all these Arab and extremist National Front whose numbers continues to grow since the last election. We fervently hope that the French people retains its clarity and does not fall into the trap of amalgam. Given the shadows surrounding this case and also that of the Merah case where a lawyer had declared to have evidence that it was handled and then executed by the French services, we hope that the alleged perpetrator of the attack against Charlie Hebdo are this time properly captured and brought to justice in order to shed light on why men can grow to such acts.
Posted on: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:25:06 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015