Cosmology What is the Most Simple Cosmology & Does it Work? How our Finite Spherical Observable Universe Exists within Infinite Eternal Space The supreme task of the physicist is to arrive at those universal elementary laws from which the cosmos can be built up by pure deduction. There is no logical path to these laws; only intuition, resting on sympathetic understanding of experience, can reach them. (Albert Einstein, 1918) The purpose of this Cosmology article is to explain how the Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) in infinite eternal space is consistent with current astronomical observations. WSM cosmology describes how you exist in this space of the universe and interact with everything around you. 1. Our Finite Spherical Universe is all that Exists. (Which led to the Big Bang Theory for the Creation of the Universe). To briefly summarise, if the universe is finite (and all there is) then there are only three options. 1. The universe is static - then it needs an antigravity component to stop it collapsing (Einsteins cosmological constant). 2. The universe is contracting (there is no evidence for this). 3. The universe is expanding (the redshift with distance supports this if it is caused by Doppler shifting due to receding motion - this is the path Cosmology went down). But this has numerous problems; e.g. what caused the big bang, what is it expanding into, what is outside the boundary of the finite universe? 2. Our Finite Spherical Observable Universe exists as part of Infinite Eternal Space. Spherical standing wave. On truth and reality, the metaphysics, philosophy and physics of space.The most simple explanation is that only one thing exists, space, thus it is necessarily infinite and eternal. From this most simple foundation we can then deduce that matter must be formed from waves in Space, where the electron is a spherical standing wave. The wave center forms the particle effect, the spherical in and out waves explain how matter is in continual two way communication with other matter (waves) in the space around it. The Wave Diagrams page is useful for picturing this. The obvious question then arises: Where do the in waves come from that form our matter? The answer is simple, from the out waves of other matter around us in space (which is a direct consequence of Huygens Principle). From this we can deduce that every wave center particle is at the center of its observable universe within infinite space. Most importantly, when you deduce this you find that each wave center only receives waves from a finite amount of other matter - thus the energy of matter is finite. See the Equation of the Cosmos. This also means that the size of matter is finite - matter is the size of its finite spherical observable universe within infinite space. This explains why when we look around us in space we see that we are surrounded by other matter (planets, stars, galaxies, galaxy clusters, etc.) and that we seem to be at the center of our observable universe. The WSM cosmology deduces that this is true wherever you are in infinite space. So we see that there were actually two paths to explore - cosmologists went down the Big Bang path of the universe being all that exists and ignored the other more simple explanation founded on a finite observable universe within infinite Space (though this only works if you understand the Wave Structure of Matter in Space). From these two cosmology theories we can then show that a cosmology founded on the Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) in Infinite Eternal Space is the most simple, that it matches observations correctly, and explains and solves many problems currently caused by the Big Bang creation theory of Cosmology. This Differs from the Big Bang Theory in Two Ways WSM cosmology describes an infinite eternal perpetual system. There is no beginning or end to space and its wave motions that form matter. While the observable universe is finite in both theories, in the Big Bang theory the universe is all there is, whereas in WSM cosmology the observable universe (Hubble sphere) is just a finite spherical region of infinite eternal space. What does the Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) Cosmology Explain? 1. Redshift with Distance It is a remarkable coincidence that there are actually two ways that you get a redshift with distance. Only the big bang explanation was considered which is the most complicated explanation, the most simple explanation was never considered because it depends upon the recently discovered wave structure of matter in space. In Big Bang cosmology, the universe is all that exists, thus to prevent it gravitationally collapsing an expanding universe was proposed. The discovery of the redshift with distance seemed to confirm this, where the redshift is assumed to be a Doppler effect of receding motion due to an expanding universe. The problems with the Big Bang theory are obvious! What is a Big Bang and how does it create Space, Time, Matter and Motion? What is outside the expanding universe? In WSM Cosmology, the observable universe is just a finite spherical region of infinite eternal space. We can only see and interact with other matter in this region. Thus there is no need for an expanding universe, as other matter around our observable universe prevents it from collapsing. This is the equivalent of Einsteins Cosmological / Antigravity constant, but it is just normal gravity of matter outside our observable universe within infinite space. So why the redshift with distance? Because as we look at matter farther away from us, we find that we share less overlap of a common finite spherical observable universe (Hubble sphere). And this means that there is less energy exchange, which equates to a redshift with distance. See The Cosmological Redshift Explained by the Intersection of Hubble Spheres redshift.vif/JournalFiles/V13NO2PDF/V13N2HAR.pdf This article shows that each wave center particle is the center of its finite spherical observable universe (Hubble Sphere) within infinite Space. As two wave center particles move apart there is less overlap of common Hubble spheres / observable universes, thus less wave interactions with increasing distance, thus less energy exchange which then provides a simple sensible explanation of the redshift with distance. 2. How our Finite Spherical Universe Exists within Infinite Eternal Space Can we visualize a three-dimensional universe which is finite yet unbounded? (Einstein, 1921) In fact it is possible for a finite spherical Universe to form within an infinite Space. Unfortunately for Einstein, he incorrectly imagined a curved space such that if you traveled far enough you would return to your starting point (a very abstract and confusing concept). The solution is far more simple, and is found instead from Huygens Principle. Three hundred years ago Christiaan Huygens, a Dutch mathematician, found that if a surface containing many separate wave sources was examined at a distance, the combined separate waves of the sources appeared as a single wave front with the shape of the surface. This wave front is termed a Huygens Combination of the separate waves. Thus the out waves of all the other matter around us within our Hubble sphere must necessarily form our spherical in waves. This unites finite matter with infinite space due to this sharing of waves. This shows how other matters spherical out waves form our matters in waves (Huygens Principle). Four important points! i) In reality there are about 1080 other wave center particles whose spherical out waves form into our spherical in waves. ii) They are obviously not all the same distance away, but distributed throughout the space of our finite spherical observable Universe (Hubble Sphere) within infinite eternal Space. iii) These other wave center particles around us are also formed from the matter waves around them, and this process extends to infinity. iv) The diagram is misleading in showing the waves starting. In reality the waves are continually flowing out from other matter around us. i.e. The system is perpetual, the in and out waves are always being shared between electron wave centers wherever you are in infinite space. So this is a very simplistic diagram of what is really going on. Electrons are very large complex wave structures of the observable universe (this is true for humans too!). Thus the mass / wave energy density of matter is finite because it is determined by a finite amount of other matter. See the Equation of the Cosmos. This is very important as it unites our finite temporal world of matter within in infinite eternal space. This is one of the great deductions from Milos Wolffs pioneering work on the Wave Structure of Matter. 3. Einsteins General Relativity and Cosmology We see that this finite spherical universe agrees with Einsteins logic on the structure of the universe as deduced from general relativity. His quote is broken up into three parts; i) Suppose we draw lines or stretch strings in all directions from a point, and mark off each of these the distance r with a measuring rod. All the free end-points of these lengths lie on a spherical surface. With increasing values of r, (the spherical surface) increases from zero up to a maximum value which is determined by the radius of the universe. ii) But for still further increasing values of r, the area gradually diminishes to zero. iii) At first, the straight lines which radiate from the starting point diverge farther and farther from one another, but later they approach each other, and finally they run together again at a counter-point to the starting point. Under such conditions they have traversed the whole spherical space (of our finite spherical universe). (Albert Einstein, 1916) It is important to realize that Einstein does not explain what happens at the radius of the universe that causes an expanding spherical surface to begin to contract (because he did not know!). The solution is now solved using Huygens principle as we have previously described. Thus; i) Describes the out waves from the wave center, these carry on going out and become the in waves of distant matter. ii) Describes the in waves - but rather than still going out these waves are coming back in and have been formed by the out waves of all the other matter in our finite spherical Universe. iii) Thus the point and the counter-point are united as the wave center of Spherical Standing Waves the size of the Universe. The Radius of the Universe is the sphere where the in waves (from distant matters out waves) contribute to our spherical in waves, and this determines both the size of matter, and thus the size of our observable universe within infinite space. 4. Machs Principle This also deduces Machs principle which states that the mass of a body is determined by all other matter in the observable universe. Thus we can now understand why the following quote from Einstein, based on the ideas of Ernst Mach, is true (and important). I must not fail to mention that a theoretical argument can be adduced in favor of the hypothesis of a finite universe. The general theory of relativity teaches that the inertial mass of a given body is greater as there are more ponderable masses in proximity to it; thus it seems very natural to reduce the total inertia (mass) of a body to interactions between it and the other bodies in the universe, as indeed, ever since Newtons time, gravity has been completely reduced to interaction between bodies. The results of calculation also indicate that the universe would necessarily be spherical. (Albert Einstein, 1954) 5. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) is sensibly explained due to radiation from cold matter in interstellar space. Since we only measure one source of CMBR this means that there cannot have been a Big Bang otherwise we would observe two sources of cosmic background radiation. The expression the temperature of space is the title of chapter 13 of Sir Arthur Eddington’s famous 1926 work, Eddington calculated the minimum temperature any body in space would cool to, given that it is immersed in the radiation of distant starlight. With no adjustable parameters, he obtained 3°K (later refined to 2.8°K ), essentially the same as the observed, so-called background temperature. A similar calculation, although with less certain accuracy, applies to the limiting temperature of intergalactic space because of the radiation of galaxy light. So the intergalactic matter is like a fog and would therefore provide a simpler explanation for the microwave radiation, including its blackbody-shaped spectrum. (Van Flandern) 6. Formation of Light and Heavy Elements It is claimed that the Big Bang theory is necessary to explain the formation of different elements in the universe. However, more recent studies show that these elements are formed from the energy of stars exploding (supernova). ... in 1957, after years of steady work - aided by advances in nuclear physics and stellar observations - Margaret and Gregory Burbridge, William Fowler and Hoyle published a comprehensive and detailed theory showing how stellar systems could produce all the known elements in proportions very close to those observed to exist. In addition, the theory accounted for the growing evidence that the elementary composition varies from star to star, something that would not be possible if the elements were produced by the Big Bang. The new theory was rapidly accepted as substantially correct. (Eric Lerner) 7. Quantised Redshift with Distance puts us at the Center of the Universe Astronomers have confirmed that galaxy redshifts are quantised. Thus according to Hubbles law, where redshifts are proportional to the distances, galaxies must be grouped into spherical shells concentric around our Milky Way galaxy. The shells being around a million light years apart with us at the center. The odds for the Earth having such a unique position in the universe by accident are less than one in a trillion. As Halton Arp writes; The fact that measured values of redshift do not vary continuously but come in steps - certain preferred values - is so unexpected that conventional astronomy has never been able to accept it, in spite of the overwhelming observational evidence. Their problem is simply that if redshifts measure radial components of velocities, then galaxy velocities can be pointed at any angle to us, hence their redshifts must be continuously distributed. For supposed recession velocities of quasars, to measure equal steps in all directions in the sky means we are at the center of a series of explosions. This is an anti-Copernican embarrassment. So a simple glance at the evidence discussed in this Chapter shows that extragalactic astronomy and Big Bang theory is swept away. In addition it appears increasingly useful to view particle masses to be communicated by wave like carriers in a Machian universe. Therefore the possibility of beat frequencies, harmonics, interference and evolution through resonant states is opened up. ... My attitude toward this result is that in a Machian universe there must be some signal carrier for inertial mass coming from distant galaxies. (Arp, 1998) The wave structure of matter deduces this perfectly. Each wave center particle is at the center of its observable universe within infinite space. And the quantised redshift is a property of waves, just as the quantum properties of light are explained with waves. 8. Why our Finite Spherical Universe does not Become Impoverished Einstein explains a further problem with the concept of the island universe as required by Newtons Law; According to the theory of Newton the stellar universe ought to be a finite island in an infinite ocean of space. This conception in itself is not very satisfactory. It is still less satisfactory because it leads to the result that the light emitted by the stars and also individual stars of the stellar system are perpetually passing out into an infinite space, never to return, and without ever again coming into interaction with other objects of nature. Such a finite material universe would be destined to become gradually but systematically impoverished. (Einstein, 1954) This problem is also solved by realizing that matter is distributed uniformly (on the very large scale) throughout infinite Space. However, only a finite spherical region of this other matter contributes to our in waves and thus our finite mass. This means that there are as many waves flowing into our finite spherical universe as there are flowing out. This perpetual finite spherical universe within infinite space would not become impoverished over time, exactly as Einstein (and sensible logic) required. 9. Olbers Paradox Solved Olbers pointed out that if the number of stars were infinite, we should observe the entire sky with the light intensity of the surface of a star like the Sun. Obviously we do not observe this! As Lerner explains; Newton was undecided on whether his laws of gravitation preclude an infinite collection of matter. He thought that only a divinely precise positioning of all the stars could prevent such an infinite collection of matter from collapsing into a series of heaps. Much later, in 1832, the astronomer Heinrich Olbers pointed out that an infinite universe seemed to imply a paradox. If there were an infinite number of stars, if one went far enough in any direction from earth, one would hit a star. This implied that the sky should be uniformly bright, as bright as the surface of the sun, which it obviously is not. (Lerner, 1991) The solution to this paradox is the same as for the other problems discussed above. Huygens sharing of waves (which explains our finite mass within an infinite space) also explains why we only see the finite number of wave centers (of matter in distant stars) within our finite spherical universe. Thus the number of observable stars and the resultant brightness of the night sky are finite rather than infinite. We should further add that the divine positioning of matter in infinite space needed to prevent matter from collapsing into a series of heaps is simply due to the fact that matter is a wave structure that depends upon the out waves of other matter around it. This limits how the wave centers can be distributed within an infinite space. 10. The Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies to Closed Systems The reason why our universe remains ordered (can evolve complexity) is because it is part of an infinite perpetual system of waves within infinite space. The second law of thermodynamics only applies to closed systems (not infinite systems), as Lerner clearly explains; Boltzmann propounded a new concept with profound cosmological implications. The universe as a whole, must, like any closed system tend toward an equilibrious state of entropy: it will be completely homogeneous, the same temperature everywhere, the stars will cool, their life-giving energy flow will cease. The universe will suffer a heat death. Any closed system must thus go from an ordered to a less ordered state - the opposite of progress. The tendency toward equilibrium is supposed to hold only in closed systems and because the earth is heated by the sun, it is not a closed system. The universe we observe is simply not decaying; the generalization of the law of increasing disorder to the entire cosmos is unsupported by observation. (Lerner, 1991) 11. On the Past, Present and Future and the One Way Direction of Time The solution is to understand that time (and matter) are really due to the wave motion of space, which is directional. Time is just a human construct to measure this rate of change / motion - there is just the eternal now of vibrating space. Lerner explains this important problem of why Time must be directional, contrary to the laws of modern particle physics; This is one of the deepest paradoxes of conventional physics today. According to all the laws of physics there should be no distinction between past and future, no direction to time. Since the second law says that entropy necessarily increases with time, and thus the past and future differ, the second law, too, is contradicted. Hence the fundamental question: If the laws of the universe have no direction in time, why does the real world? The conventional answer to this question is, strangely, the Big Bang. The Big Bang started the universe off in a highly orderly and regular state - a perfect state of very low entropy. Since the universe must run down through states of increasing disorder, closer to equilibrium (the state in which there is no flow of energy), the direction of time is defined. Thus, if there was no Big Bang why does time move forward? The importance of the answers extends far beyond their role at the center of a consistent cosmology. They strike at the heart of some of the greatest mysteries faced by science, philosophy and religion - the questions of the nature of human consciousness, the relation of mind and body, and free will. The distinction between past, present, and future is basic to our experience of consciousness - we are conscious in the now, we remember the past, but we cannot know the future. It also is central to our idea of free will, for it implies that our actions in the present affect the future, that the past is fixed but the future can be changed. How can these ideas be reconciled with a concept of physical laws in which past, present and future all exist equally and cannot be distinguished? The real world is continually coming into existence, created by an infinitely complex web of instabilities and interactions. As Prigogine puts it, Time is creation. The future is just not there. Times irreversibility is based on the continuity of space, on its infinite divisibility. (Lerner, 1991) Once we realize that it is not time but the wave motion of continuous space which is fundamental, then it becomes obvious why time is directional. It takes time for in waves to flow into their wave centers, thus the in waves are the future, the wave center is the present, and the out-waves are the past. This is important for it explains why time is directional because the wave motion of space is directional. Thus we no longer need the Big Bang theory or the second law of thermodynamics to explain the flow of time. This also means that space itself does not experience time. Only matter, as the wave motion of space, experiences time. Thus space must be eternal. 12. On Freedom: Our Universe is Necessarily Connected but not Deterministic It is very important to appreciate the difference between a necessarily connected universe (as explained by the Wave Structure of Matter) and a deterministic universe which requires knowledge of the initial conditions from which things, being necessarily connected, can then be determined. Again the solution is obvious, for we live in a finite and necessarily connected universe, but because it is within infinite space, and continually has waves flowing into it from infinity, they can never be pre-determined. This explains the uncertainty of Quantum Theory and that we can never know where each successive in wave will meet at its wave center, thus we can never know both the future motion (momentum) and position of the particle. This then deduces Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. This limited freedom and limited determinism within infinite space is explained in more detail in the Free Will Vs. Determinism page. 13. Black holes / Worm Holes Do Not Exist Black holes and worm holes are mathematical constructs - infinite energy densities do not exist - time travel does not exist - faster than light travel does not exist. As Tesla astutely wrote; Todays scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. (Nikola Tesla) Most importantly, the measured velocity of stars near the center of our galaxy contradicts the the supposed black hole they claim exists there. As Lerner writes; In 1989, however, new evidence developed which will probably doom the black-hole hypothesis. Gas and plasma near the center of galaxies has always been observed to move at a high velocity, up to 1500 km/sec for our own galaxy, and similar or higher values for others. These velocities are generally treated as evidence for a black hole whose powerful gravitational field has trapped the swirling gases. But the two scientists at the University of Arizona, G.H and M.J. Rieke, carefully measured the velocities of stars within a few light-years of the center of our galaxy, and found the velocities are no higher than 70km/sec, twenty times slower than the plasma velocities measured in the same area. Since the stars must respond to any gravitational force, their low velocities show that no black hole exists. The high-speed gases must therefore be trapped only by a magnetic field, which does not affect the stars. Albert Einstein did not believe in black holes either, even though you now read that his general relativity deduces them! His view was that nature had natural limits that prevented infinite energy densities from occurring. He was correct. Having said that, it is quite possible that matter forms into high energy density states that do not emit and absorb light, and thus can only be seen by their gravitational effects. Do Black Holes Exist? Valeri P. Frolov arxiv.org/abs/1411.6981 14. Dark Matter The rotational motion of galaxies cannot be explained with modern physics theory of gravitation. To explain this anomaly they filled the universe with dark matter. In the wave structure of matter gravity is due to the slowing of waves in higher energy density space. This explains why light curves past the sun, it is simply refraction. And because matter is made of waves this also explains why objects attract one another, as the wave center particles always re-position in the direction of slowest incoming waves. i.e. Where there is more matter thus a higher energy density space and slower incoming waves. However, because of the many errors in modern big bang cosmology / particle physics it is hard to know what the true facts are and thus the solution to the problem. Below are three possible explanations. i) Given that they incorrectly treat matter as discrete particles, yet also as energy fields in space-time, it is possible that their calculations of the energy density of space are wrong. In the WSM all of space is full of waves, matter particles are just where the waves are coherent. Matter is really a structure of the universe - thus they may have incorrectly calculated the energy density (wave energy) of space, and are calling the true energy dark matter. Because their gravitational theory has the wrong foundations (in WSM gravity is simply the slowing of waves in higher energy density space) thus if the energy density is higher than they realise this would explain higher gravitational effects needed to explain the rotation of galaxies. ii) There may be matter waves in states that are not easily seen. This is quite possible, we only see matter when it emits light, and this depends on it having electrons bound in certain wave patterns in the atom / molecule. These bound electrons (wave centers) act as spherical resonators for resonant coupling (light). iii) It is possible (likely?) that there are electromagnetic effects that are influencing the rotational velocity of galaxies that they are unaware of (see the electric universe). Given that electromagnetic effects are 1040 times larger than gravitational then this would only need to have a tiny contribution to have significant effects. (In the WSM electric charge is due to changes in wave velocity with wave amplitude where higher wave amplitude = higher wave velocity.) Gravity and charge are explained in the following WSM articles; Albert Einsteins Theory of General Relativity Wave Equations in an Elastic Medium Space Truth Statements on Physical Reality 15. Predicted Motion of Distant Galaxies Confirmed Finally, the WSM cosmology predicts that motion of distant galaxies will behave as if there is matter all around them, whereas in the big bang cosmology there would only be matter on one side (the inside, as there is no outside). This prediction was made in 2003. You can use the wayback machine to view our cosmology page dated 11th of February 2003 to confirm this (see section 1.6). web.archive.org/web/20030211123857/spaceandmotion/Cosmology.htm This was confirmed by observation of distant galaxies in 2008 (and was subsequently attacked and dismissed by Big Bang cosmologists - for the obvious reason that it contradicts Big Bang cosmology!). ScienceDaily (Sep. 24, 2008) -- Using data from NASAs Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), scientists have identified an unexpected motion in distant galaxy clusters. The cause, they suggest, is the gravitational attraction of matter that lies beyond the observable universe. The clusters show a small but measurable velocity that is independent of the universes expansion and does not change as distances increase, says lead researcher Alexander Kashlinsky at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. We never expected to find anything like this. .. The distribution of matter in the observed universe cannot account for this motion. Journal reference: A. Kashlinsky, F. Atrio-Barandela, D. Kocevski, H. Ebeling. A measurement of large-scale peculiar velocities of clusters of galaxies: results and cosmological implications. Astrophysical Journal Letters, Print edition October 20, 2008; online week of September 22, 2008. sciencedaily/releases/2008/09/080923104410.htm Conclusion It is fitting to end with some astute comments from Eric Lerner on the relationship between cosmology, society, morality and truth. Today, another scientific revolution is beginning, one that may change our view of the cosmos as radically as the last. And today it again seems likely that the effects of this revolution, both social and scientific, will be profound. If the universe is truly infinite in time and space, then the implications go well beyond cosmology to the whole of our view of nature, to religion, philosophy and society as a whole. Teilhard de Chardin anticipated many of Prigogines more concrete ideas. But equally important, he argues that only this prospect of an unlimited future can be the basis for human morality, even for human activity - the only prospect that can prevent humanity from despairing. If mankind came to believe that progress would halt, then mankind would soon stop inventing and constructing for a work it knew to be doomed in advance. And stricken at the very source of impetus that sustains it, it would disintegrate from nausea or revolt and crumble into dust. ... If progress is a myth... our efforts will flag. With that the whole of evolution will come to a halt - because we are evolution. But the new ideas of the emerging scientific revolution bring an entirely different outlook. If the universe is evolving from an infinite past to an infinite future, if human development is only the latest stage of continual progress stretching through the unlimited reaches of time, then the very idea of an end to history is ludicrous, an unfunny joke. If there is something wrong, then it must be fixed. Such an outlook offers a hope of renewed progress. It asserts that scientific advance and technological development are not at an end, but could be starting a new period of explosive growth. It provides the motivation human beings need to join together in collective efforts rather than to fragment into self-cantered anarchy. It shows that the technology exists to eradicate want on earth and open the path outward into an infinite universe. (Lerner, 1991) And the following quotes from Thomas Kuhns famous work on The Structure of Scientific Revolutions are very relevant; All crises begin with the blurring of a paradigm and the consequent loosening of the rules for normal research. ..Or finally, the case that will most concern us here, a crisis may end with the emergence of a new candidate for paradigm and with the ensuing battle over its acceptance. It is, I think, particularly in periods of acknowledged crisis that scientists have turned to philosophical analysis as a device for unlocking the riddles of their field. Scientists have not generally needed or wanted to be philosophers. Copernicanism made few converts for almost a century after Copernicus death. Newtons work was not generally accepted, particularly on the Continent, for more than half a century after the Principia appeared. The difficulties of conversion have often been noted by the scientists themselves. Darwin, in a particularly perceptive passage at the end of his Origin Of Species, wrote: Although I am fully convinced of the truth of the views given in this volume... I, by no means expect to convince experienced naturalists whose minds are stocked with a multitude of facts all viewed, during a long course of years, from a point of view directly opposite to mine. ... But I look with confidence to the future - to young and rising naturalists, who will be able to view both sides of the question with impartiality. And Max Planck, surveying his own career in his Scientific Autobiography, sadly remarked that; A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. (Thomas Kuhn, 1962) The Wave Structure of Matter is the most simple science theory of reality and it clearly works by correctly deducing the laws of Nature. The only difficulty is that it is new, and most people have been brought up with particle physics and the Big Bang theory, so it takes a while for our minds to adjust to this new way of seeing things. But the Wave Structure of Matter in Space is simple, sensible and obvious once known. Source: Geoff Haselhurst, Philosopher of Science, Theoretical Physics, Metaphysics spaceandmotion/Haselhurst-Biography.htm Image: The history of the universe. Inflation happened right after the Big Bang, and the CMB in the fifth stage of this plot. mappingignorance.org/2014/10/08/search-cosmic-inflation/ — with Ivan Dosinsky and Yaadash Baqhair.
Posted on: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:05:17 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015