Definition Interactional Sociolinguistics 1. Background Discourse analysis to the discussion of interactional sociolinguistics is derived from a variety of disciplines and are based on anthropology, sociology, and linguistics. The parts are of concern to all three disciplines, namely cultural, social, and language. Contributions in interactional sociolinguistics is given by an anthropologist John Gumperz, which provides an understanding of how people can be a variety of grammatical knowledge of the language, but it is different to what yangdituturkan kontks, things like that are very different between what is produced and what is understood. Contributions are also provided by a sociologist Erving Goffman, who gives a description of how the language is placed in a particular social environment, and how language reflects, and adds, meaning and structure in the environment. The idea is applied extensively expert in linguistics, for example by Brown and Levinson (1987), Schiffrin (1987a), and Tanen (1989a). Although different set of view of discipline in this Definition, in which there are some basic beliefs about language, context, and interaction of speakers and Mitr said integrally presented. 2. Definition Interactional Sociolinguistics The definition in the discussion of interactional sociolinguistics is not the proper definition. However, the definition in the discussion of this interactional sociolinguistics is a view or rather a contribution from the two figures that could eventually develop interactional sociolinguistic issues. In this section, Deborah describes the basic idea of interactional sosiolingustik. Deborah started to work Gumperz and Goffman then switch to work. A. Contributions Antopologi: Gumperz In most introductory essay collection finally (Discourse Strategies), Gumperz stated that he was looking for the development of sociolinguistic commentary Definition prosese toward real-time analysis in the meeting semuka. Linkage between culture, society, individual, and code dikembangankan in Discourse Strategies (discourse strategies), essays (as stated above) that seek development Definition sociolinguistic interpretation toward real-time analysis of the process in meeting semuka. In the first article in this collection, Gumperz (1982a: 12) reveals the impact of structural linguistics (formulated by Saussure (1959) and applied by linguists working antropologpada speakers they do not have) to understand our culture and cognition: structural analysis has provided evidence empirically for charging that human cognition is significantly influenced by historical forces, what we feel, and we keep in our mind is a function that is culturally have determined the tendency to perceive and assimilate us. In an effort to understand these effects, we need to general theory of verbal communication terintegrasiyang we are familiar with grammar, culture and interactive conventions into the unity of a common conceptual framework and analytical procedures. Verbal communication theory proposed by Gumperz require the addition of concepts and analytical procedures were awakened from agasan beginning of culture, social, language, and speakers. The new construct is contextualization cues. Contextualization cues linked to two other concepts: prejudice and a contextual inference. The key sociolinguistic Gumperz interpesonal communication is the view that language is socially and culturally is constructed symbol systems that are used as a way of reflecting the meaning of the micro-social level (eg; the identity of the group, the difference in status) and creates a macro-level social meaning (if someone tells da do at the right time). Speakers are members of a social and cultural group: the way we use language not only reflects the identity, the basis of our group but also provide a continuous indication of the sort of who we are, what we want to communicate, and how we know how to do. Memproduk skills and understand prosesindeksikal it makes them look, and influenced by, the local context merupak part of our communicative competence. As we see in the following section, Erving Goffmans work also focuses on knowledge placed, speakers, and social contexts, but different ways and different emphasis. B. Construction Sociologist: Goffman Which also contributes to the development of interactional sociolinguistics is Erving Goffmans work. Although Goffman did not analyze the language course, focus on intraksi sosialnyamelengkapi focus Gumperzpada withdrawal situation conclusion. Goffman put language (and other sign systems) in the context of the same social and interpersonal skills such as setting presaposisi Gumperz findings are important background for understanding the meaning. There are additional Goffman, namely the understanding of form and meaning in the context that allow us to more fully characterize and appreciate the contextual alleged illustrated in the alleged hearer to speaker meaning. Sociology Goffman developed the idea of some classical sociological theorists and apply it to the realm of structural complexity of social life (before working Goffman) is widely took place without unnoticed: face- to-face social interaction. Work Goffman as providing contextual elaboration presumption that people use and mengonstruk during the suspect, and as a means to offer a view of the presumption of externally way dionstruk and determine external attachments to the ways we understand the message. Much of the recent work on speaker Goffman (1974; 1979) terbagun Atasa division initially locate speakers in the framework is a set of positions of individual participants in the speech perceptual boundaries are in relation to the direction of the speech. Goffman distinguishes four position or status of participants: Animator, Author, Figure, and Principal. Animator memproduk speech, Author creates utterances, Figure photographed through speech, and Principal responds to speech. 3. Applications Interactional Sociolinguistics in Context Tannen, said that the interactional sosiolingustik described in naturally occurring conversations between friends. Finally, interactional sociolinguistics provide treatment of the characteristics of the speakers transcription may store contextual cues. In this section, I give an example of a conversation where the conversation is addressed to someone else or speak to other people: Hes Diet. Hendry: Do you want candy? Irene: No Zelda: Hes on a diet Debby: Who is on a diet Irene: I, my diet And my mother bought ....... Zelda: You do not Irene: My mother bought three mint Debby: Oh, yes I am An illustrated above speakers anaimator mechanical aspects, penemrima, it became the principal aspect. Thus, Zelda says hes on a diet, he was the principal animator for Irene. Zelda report something about Irene that Irene could tell on him (dieting is personal information) and for the feelings or the content of Irene firm. Speak for others: for the placement of meaning. The key in understanding the interactional sociolinguistics is the placement of the meaning or significance of laying. In this hail, tested three levels: Rectification: interrupt or mencapuri, Social action: provide an explanation for the speaker and the hearer, and Display identity and identity-micro-macro: gender alignment. 4. Interactional Sociolinguistics as Discourse Analysis That gives a Definition interactional sociolinguistic discourse that focuses on laying the meaning or meanings placement. So, focus on ditempatkanya inference Gumperz (alleged), while Goffman provides a framework for describing and understanding the sociological form and meaning to social and interpersonal context that gives meaning presumptions for interpretation. Trying to find the placement of the meaning and significance of the search for how to contribute towards the acquisition process and interaction. He was deit. 5. Conclusion That gives a Definition interactional sociolinguistic discourse that focuses on laying the meaning or meanings placement. So, focus on ditempatkanya inference Gumperz (alleged), while Goffman provides a framework for describing and understanding the sociological form and meaning to social and interpersonal context that gives meaning presumptions for interpretation. Trying to find the placement of the meaning and significance of the search for how to contribute towards the acquisition process and interaction. He was deit. Bibliography: Schiffrin, Deborah. 2007. Definition Study of Discourse. New York: Library Student (Task Discourse Analysis)
Posted on: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:40:15 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015